TFS and Codebeamer compete in the software development tool category. Codebeamer seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration, traceability, and compliance features.
Features: TFS offers scalable version control, agile project management, and seamless integration with Visual Studio, supporting end-to-end application lifecycle management. It enhances development projects with its project management and agile tools. Codebeamer, meanwhile, excels in full traceability, compliance, and collaboration, offering robust reporting tools and covering end-to-end processes.
Room for Improvement: TFS is limited to Windows environments and poses challenges in merging features, viewing history, and admin setups, with difficulties integrating into non-Microsoft environments. Codebeamer presents a steeper learning curve for new users and UI improvements could enhance its integration with Jira while requiring better adaptability to user workflows and network settings.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TFS supports a wide range of deployments from on-premises to hybrid cloud, offering flexibility but challenging integration. Codebeamer’s on-premises, private cloud, and hybrid cloud formats cater to different organizational needs but present setup complexities. Customer service for both products receives mixed reviews, with TFS users either resolving issues independently or facing delays, while Codebeamer needs improved service responsiveness and documentation.
Pricing and ROI: TFS is considered expensive, particularly due to licensing complexity, but offers solid integration with Microsoft products, presenting good ROI when used within Microsoft's ecosystem. Codebeamer, while moderately priced, is valued for its features but may not be economical for all organizations. It is especially beneficial for industries needing high compliance and customization, providing significant productivity improvements.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
Integrating TFS with Visual Studio and Azure Cloud has improved our development processes by providing better integration and reducing errors.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
as a Microsoft product, it might have limited global documentation or support options compared to GitLab.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
Its stability is lacking as we have encountered security leaks and glitches.
Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
TFS is not as fast, easy to use, or configurable as GitLab, despite moving into the cloud.
I am content with how TFS is structured now, particularly the Azure version.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
The integration with Azure DevOps also offers seamless functionality for CI/CD processes.
Makes it easier for me to create builds and release pipelines without needing to program YAML files.
codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.
Visual Studio’s Team Foundation Server (TFS) is a powerful application development lifecycle management solution. It aids developers in managing every aspect of their DevOps and application creation. TFS combines many different types of solutions into a single powerful platform.
Visual Studio TFS Benefits
Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy TFS include:
Visual Studio TFS Features
Source code management. TFS comes with all of the tools that developers need to completely manage their source code. They can share their code so that multiple developers can work on the same project. Additionally, TFS enables them to do things like review the history of a particular piece of source code.
Reviews from Real Users
TFS is a highly effective solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its source code management capabilities and its powerful integration suite.
Carl B., the vice president of engineering at Vertex Downhole Ltd, writes, “The most valuable features are related to source code management. Using TFS for source code management and being able to branch and have multiple developers work on the same projects is valuable. We can also branch and merge code back together.”
Ashish K., the principal consultant at Wipro, says, “I have found almost all of the features valuable because it integrates well with your Microsoft products. If a client is using the entire Microsoft platform, then TFS would be definitely preferable. It integrates with the digital studio development environment as well.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
