Codebeamer Reviews

Codebeamer delivers substantial benefits, particularly in project collaboration cost savings and administrative efficiency, which clients report reducing by 35-40%. Customization and deployment efforts are lowered by 65-70%. Codebeamer substantially cuts time and expenses, especially in AUTOSPICE implementations, though challenges exist with Machine Learning Ops integration. Improvements in certification processes are noted, resulting in a positive financial outcome.

Codebeamer's pricing is considered reasonable and moderately priced compared to similar ALM solutions, aligning with industry standards. While some view it as on the expensive side, others appreciate its value due to features like ASPICE and ISO 26262 compliance modules. Users generally agree that it is not the cheapest option, but it offers a competitive balance between cost and functionality for enterprise buyers evaluating ALM solutions.

• "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
• "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
• "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

Codebeamer is primarily used for managing computer-based applications in FDA-regulated industries like pharma and biotech. It aids in requirement management, task tracking, and lifecycle management. Consultancies deploy it for clients in medical and automotive sectors, providing ISO 26262 certification support. It assists automotive, telecom, and health manufacturing companies with project management and CI/CD cycles. Codebeamer is notable for improving workflows and integrating with client systems, favored by medium-sized enterprises for its cost-effectiveness and versatility.

Codebeamer's customer service is praised for being transparent. Users find technical support mostly satisfactory, with prompt responses. Response times can vary based on the complexity. Live chat availability is limited to office hours. Emails receive replies within 24 hours, with high-priority issues addressed faster. There is a demand for hotline chat and documentation in Chinese. For customizations, users often go through the services division. Both customer service and technical support receive positive feedback.

Most users find Codebeamer's initial setup straightforward, with automatic processes and minimal time required. Some mention a lack of documentation, which might complicate setup for new users. Deployment options include on-premises and cloud, catering to different industry needs. Challenges arise in establishing a solid foundation, especially in complex environments like automotive. Installation is generally easy on Windows, but can be complex on Linux. Larger implementations may require more time and resources.

Codebeamer impresses users with its scalability, excelling over competitors like PTC Integrity, Polarion, and IBM. It's valued for handling thousands of users on diverse platforms effortlessly, including Windows, Linux, and Docker. Enterprise-level companies find it adequate for their needs. Some find scalability features easy to use but note a learning curve. Experiences with fluctuating license counts show no issues, indicating robust scalability for various operational demands. Web-based nature boosts its flexibility and adaptability.

Codebeamer users report high stability, rating it between eight and ten out of ten, acknowledging its reliable performance without bugs or glitches. They highlight occasional compatibility issues when integrating with older software versions and potential slowdowns during heavy server loads. Yet, running independently or with enhanced server resources typically mitigates these issues. Despite this, users commend its advanced stability, considering it an excellent tool in their experiences.