Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Codebeamer Logo

Codebeamer Reviews

Vendor: PTC
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Codebeamer?

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

Get the Codebeamer Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira and more!
Codebeamer is the #6 ranked solution in top Application Lifecycle Management Suites. PeerSpot users give Codebeamer an average rating of 7.8 out of 10. Codebeamer is most commonly compared to Microsoft Azure DevOps: Codebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOps. Codebeamer is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 65% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 34% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Codebeamer
March 2026
Get the report
Helped 884,328 peers since 2012

Featured Codebeamer reviews

Read more reviews

Codebeamer mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Codebeamer in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category stands at 7.0%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Codebeamer7.0%
Jira12.3%
Microsoft Azure DevOps10.3%
Other70.4%
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

PeerResearch reports based on Codebeamer reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryApplication Lifecycle Management (ALM) SuitesMar 18, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 18, 2026Download
ComparisonCodebeamer vs JiraMar 18, 2026Download
ComparisonCodebeamer vs Microsoft Azure DevOpsMar 18, 2026Download
ComparisonCodebeamer vs OpenText Application Quality ManagementMar 18, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Azure DevOps4.110.3%95%137 interviewsAdd to research
Jira4.112.3%91%279 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Codebeamer's most valuable features include full traceability, excellent integration capabilities, and the Smart Requirement View. Users appreciate its direct use of built-in project management modules and various templates tailored to specific industries. Codebeamer supports Agile methodology with advanced analytics, reporting capabilities, and seamless migration between on-premise and cloud environments. Its API-based integration enhances connectivity, and users can efficiently manage requirements based on industry-specific standards. Users also highlight its easy customization and robust performance.
  • "The most valuable aspect is the integration with third-party tools, as we don't have to use different tools to start from the stakeholder requirements down to subsystems."
  • "Other benefits observed from using Codebeamer include its excellent release management and access management features."
  • "Codebeamer stands out against competition due to these features."

Room for Improvement

Codebeamer requires enhancements in industry-specific features, usability, and user interface design. Documentation and language support need improvement, especially for non-English speakers. Its integration with tools like Jira and compatibility with internal systems have issues. Real-time data analytics, simplified setup, customization options, and improved drag-and-drop functionality are desired. Addressing glitches, supporting more integration tools, and improving speed are critical. The system's complexity and outdated interface hinder user adaptability and efficiency, requiring modernization efforts.
  • "What is really disappointing is that some features which have been promised for years are still not mature enough to use."
  • "Codebeamer's UI is somewhat boring, while Jira's is more exciting and user-friendly."
  • "There should be more integration tools available. Although Codebeamer has a substantial amount of integration options with multiple tools, new technologies and software constantly emerge."

ROI

Codebeamer provides significant benefits, reflected in reduced project collaboration costs and a 35-40% decrease in administrative load. Users report a 65-70% reduction in customization and deployment efforts, enhancing efficiency for AUTOSPICE implementations. Organizations gain easier certification processes and potential cost savings through quicker time-to-market. While successful adoption can yield substantial returns, integrating with Machine Learning Ops may present challenges. Overall, Codebeamer aids in balancing development speed and cost efficiency.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers report Codebeamer's pricing as moderate compared to competitors, noting it offers a good value, especially with ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262. Some rate its cost at eight or nine out of ten, perceiving it as fairly priced. Codebeamer is neither the cheapest nor the most expensive, but many find its scalability, features, and integration with multiple tools justify the investment.
  • "Codebeamer is not a cheap solution."
  • "They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."
  • "It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations use Codebeamer for applications and systems in FDA-regulated industries, managing requirements, tasks, bugs, changes, and lifecycle. It's utilized in automotive, telecom, and biotech sectors for compliance standards like ISO 26262. Codebeamer aids in CI/CD cycles, testing, and project management. Additionally, it's used for digitizing processes, access management, and organizing structures within companies. Medium-sized enterprises find it economical, offering tools for business requirements and integration strategies.

Service and Support

Codebeamer's customer service receives positive feedback. Their support is accessible and prompt, generally resolving queries within a day. For simple issues, answers come quickly, but complex matters may take longer. Documentation in local languages would benefit users. Some appreciate a hotline chat addition. Responses to high-priority queries arrive in six to eight hours. Users often consult internal experts. Customizations may require assistance from a separate division. Satisfaction ratings are high, typically scoring eight or nine out of ten.

Deployment

Codebeamer's initial setup is generally considered straightforward and quick. Most users report it as simple, though some note complexity, especially for new users or specific industry requirements. Installation tends to be easier on Windows compared to Linux. Deployment is generally smooth, often requiring just one person. Some users highlight the need for clearer documentation and better templates, especially in automotive applications. On-premises and cloud deployment options are available, catering to different security needs.

Scalability

Codebeamer is noted for its scalability across multiple platforms such as Windows and Linux, consistently supporting enterprise-level needs. Users commend its performance, comparing it favorably to competitors like PTC Integrity and IBM. Many agree that scaling is not an issue, with some users suggesting improvements for documentation to assist new users. Some express different ratings on ease of use, emphasizing scalability adaptability.

Stability

Users generally find Codebeamer stable and dependable, rating it highly for stability. Some encounter occasional glitches or notice performance issues when running multiple applications on a single server, but these are rare. Compatibility with older versions can cause issues for some users. Most have no major stability complaints and associate any downtime with integration or implementation factors rather than Codebeamer itself. Stability ratings range from eight to ten out of ten.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Codebeamer Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business3
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business163
Midsize Enterprise89
Large Enterprise460
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
34%
Computer Software Company
12%
Healthcare Company
6%
Retailer
5%
Financial Services Firm
4%
University
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Construction Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Outsourcing Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
2%
Government
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Comms Service Provider
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Newspaper
1%

Compare Codebeamer with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Codebeamer

Codebeamer was previously known as codeBeamer ALM.

Codebeamer customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault

Related questions

  • 33
When evaluating Application Lifecycle Management suites, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
  • 24
Looking for suggestions - we need a test management and defect tracking tool which can be integrated with an automation tool.
  • 25
Looking for a Comparison of JIRA, TFS & HP ALM as a Test Management Tool
  • 13
Do you have any feedback on the HPE ALM Octane release that came out in June 2016?
  • 13
How does Digite's Swift ALM tool compare with HPE ALM or JIRA?
  • 40
Would you use one or both ALM and JIRA to manage the SDLC and production support work?
  • 16
What ALM software do you recommend for building web apps?
  • 26
What is better for ALM: Scrum or Kanban?
  • 10
What features should one consider when choosing an ALM suite?
  • 37
What is your recommended Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) product for a large enterprise?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer Logo
Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Codebeamer
Jira vs Codebeamer Logo
Jira vs Codebeamer
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Codebeamer Logo
OpenText Application Quality Management vs Codebeamer
Rally Software vs Codebeamer Logo
Rally Software vs Codebeamer
Jama Connect vs Codebeamer Logo
Jama Connect vs Codebeamer
Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer Logo
Polarion ALM vs Codebeamer
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Codebeamer Logo
OpenText Software Delivery Management vs Codebeamer
TFS vs Codebeamer Logo
TFS vs Codebeamer
PTC Integrity vs Codebeamer Logo
PTC Integrity vs Codebeamer
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Codebeamer Logo
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs Codebeamer
Atlassian ALM vs Codebeamer Logo
Atlassian ALM vs Codebeamer
Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs Codebeamer Logo
Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs Codebeamer
Ansys SCADE LifeCycle vs Codebeamer Logo
Ansys SCADE LifeCycle vs Codebeamer
See all alternatives
 
Codebeamer Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Software Engineer at Festo AG4.0I use Codebeamer mainly for Kanban boards, release and sprint management, and access control. It's stable and functional but outdated, with a dull UI. While helpful, it could improve in scalability and user-friendliness for newcomers.
Independent Technical Consultant at i4c4.0I find Codebeamer ideal for automotive projects, especially for medium-sized companies, due to its economical nature and extensive integration capabilities. However, it requires server upgrades and its drag-and-drop feature needs improvement. It has boosted our ROI effectively.
Process Method and Tool Developer at ZF Group NAO4.0<p>I've used Codebeamer for several years and value its integrated toolset, especially for R&amp;D, but wish it had better speed, user interface customization, and support for promised features like working sets and Pure Variants integration.</p>
National Manager - PLM Business at a computer software company with 201-500 employees4.5We explored Codebeamer for building our ALM practice but deferred for PLM focus with our OEM. Its requirements management aids industries with standards. However, more integration tools are needed. Codebeamer competes with IBM Rational and Siemens Polarion.
Architect at a media company with 10,001+ employees3.5I use Codebeamer primarily for requirements management due to its efficient built-in project management modules, though it faces challenges with customization, Linux installation, and older PDM Windchill compatibility. Its web-based client saves time and resources.
Solutions Architect at Capgemini3.5I use CodeBeamer to align business requirements and processes, appreciating its flexibility compared to outdated tools like Arvines and Jira. However, during platform migrations, some tasks needed to be redone, indicating room for improvement in this area.
Process Method and Tool Developer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees4.0I primarily use Codebeamer for lifecycle management, appreciating its integration and stability. However, it lacks maturity compared to Jira, needing better document integration and customization options to simplify its complex UI for specific user roles.
Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees3.5We utilize Codebeamer for managing requirements, tasks, and issues within the V-model framework. While it's user-friendly, adapting it to specific workflows poses challenges, and we're collaborating with PTC to address certain issues, ensuring smoother integration.