Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 23, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Codebeamer's customer support is praised for transparency and speed, with users suggesting a hotline chat for improvement.
Sentiment score
5.9
IBM ELM support is helpful but needs faster responses and simpler processes; additional self-service resources are recommended.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Codebeamer is scalable across platforms, rated favorably against competitors, effective but requires effort to adapt to features.
Sentiment score
7.4
IBM ELM's scalability varies; seamless for some, challenging for others, requiring knowledge and affected by licensing and stability issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.8
Codebeamer is praised for its reliability and stability, earning high ratings despite occasional minor glitches.
Sentiment score
6.7
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is generally seen as stable, though impressions vary based on different product experiences.
 

Room For Improvement

Codebeamer requires enhanced features, usability, integration, international support, documentation, intuitive interface, and improved marketing and compatibility strategies.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management requires enhanced reporting, user interface, integration, customization, stability, and improved user guidance and documentation.
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise users view Codebeamer pricing as competitive and aligned with industry standards, despite not being the cheapest option.
IBM ELM is seen as costly, yet its long-term value ensures strong user retention despite underutilized features.
 

Valuable Features

Codebeamer excels in traceability, customization, and integrations, ideal for automotive and pharmaceuticals, replacing tools like IBM DOORS.
IBM ELM offers customizable planning, integration with Git, compliance features, and cost-effective cloud-based SaaS solutions for lifecycle management.
 

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
10th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...
Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
13th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Codebeamer is 7.7%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is 2.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Gaurav Kandurwar - PeerSpot reviewer
Has good technical support services, but the migration process needs improvement
In my current company, we previously used multiple tools for requirement management, test management, and tracking, such as Arvines, a hardware list for test management, and Jira for tracking purposes. However, these tools were part of a segregated environment, and management decided to upgrade them due to their outdated functionalities. Consequently, my team and I evaluated various tools for requirement management and chose CodeBeamer for its flexibility. We found it is more adaptable to our organization's needs and processes, making it a suitable choice for our migration efforts. During the evaluation process, we considered features compatibility with our business processes and flexibility to accommodate changes. This aspect was crucial to minimizing adjustment time and ensuring a smooth transition to the new tool.
Harold Pogue - PeerSpot reviewer
A complex deployment that is not stable, but is cloud-based
The team of 15 to 20 software engineers uses IBM Rational ALM and Jira for testing. They coupled different online packages together because the Duration Enterprise was impossible to use IBM Rational ALM did not help the organization and we ended up moving to another solution. The most valuable…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
824,106 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
31%
Computer Software Company
15%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?
As I am not involved in purchasing the product, it is difficult for me to comment on the product's pricing model.
What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?
Codebeamer is not completely compatible with our internal network setup, which could be improved.
What needs improvement with IBM Rational ALM?
The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex. For business users with no experience in IT, it can be particularly challenging to understand the UI and create test cas...
What is your primary use case for IBM Rational ALM?
We use IBM Rational ALM as part of our overall application suite for our manufacturing company. It is used by our engineering team to capture requirements, perform testing, and manage defects. Spec...
 

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM
IBM Engineering Rhapsody, Rational ALM, MKS
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst
Find out what your peers are saying about Codebeamer vs. IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,106 professionals have used our research since 2012.