Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Logo

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) pros and cons

Vendor: IBM
3.6 out of 5
1,150 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

The planning feature incorporates comprehensive Scrum concepts, including Sprint and Sprint retrospective, which are crucial for effective project management.
Cataloging feature simplifies the identification of applications and their specific features, proving valuable for enterprises by organizing critical elements like source code and documents.
The integration with Git and workflow capabilities in IBM Rational ALM facilitate seamless collaboration between development and production teams.
A unique feature such as GC (global configuration) distinguishes IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management from other competitors in the ALM space.
The transition to a SaaS-based platform offers flexibility and modernization, which is considered a notable advantage.

CONS

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management needs more comprehensive reporting features beyond Scrum and Sprint reports.
There is a lack of beginner support material such as FAQs or simple training.
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management requires improvements in stability and interconnectivity between packages.
Users encounter excessive button clicks for simple tasks, leading to a poor user experience.
The popularity of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is being overshadowed by more modern tools like Jira, which are more attractive to new users.
 

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Pros review quotes

LG
Sep 8, 2019
It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete.
NK
Oct 1, 2019
At the same time, if you're working from the architect or the designing team you, it's quite easy to manage the resources online.
Manoj Sajjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2023
I would rate the stability of this product a nine out of ten.
Learn what your peers think about IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,106 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1251984 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 10, 2022
The integration with Git works well.
AH
Aug 13, 2020
You can customize the board according to your needs.
reviewer1256694 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 5, 2020
The most valuable feature is the reporting of the CPU usage on the dashboard.
Avijit Amitabh - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 23, 2024
The transition to a SaaS-based solution is a distinct advantage.
reviewer2344761 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2024
The solution is customizable.
AH
Jun 12, 2018
The planning feature is rich with Scrum concepts: Sprint, Sprint retrospective, the rules in the Scrum framework.
RA
Dec 2, 2022
One of the key advantages of IBM Rational ALM is its workflow capabilities, which enable seamless collaboration between development and production teams and ensure that all stakeholders are aware of the progress and readiness of the solution. Additionally, the solution is good for integration.
 

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Cons review quotes

LG
Sep 8, 2019
There is not enough beginner support material in the form of FAQs or simple training to help you get started.
NK
Oct 1, 2019
The directory designer manager is uncivil. The design manager is clearly really unstable.
Manoj Sajjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 3, 2023
Some improvements to the user interface (UI) would be helpful, such as exposing more services to make it easier to customize to the needs of each customer.
Learn what your peers think about IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.
824,106 professionals have used our research since 2012.
reviewer1251984 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 10, 2022
One of the complaints from users is that they have to click buttons too many times for just a simple task. Changing this would lead to a better user experience.
AH
Aug 13, 2020
The reporting functionality needs to be improved.
reviewer1256694 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 5, 2020
The stability of this solution can be improved.
Avijit Amitabh - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 23, 2024
The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex.
reviewer2344761 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 16, 2024
The GUI is a little bit outdated.
AH
Jun 12, 2018
I would like to see better reporting features. The out-of-box reporting is - I don't want to say limited - but the focus is on the Scrum and Sprint reports. We need more reporting features regarding the history of the work, tracking it more deeply.
RA
Dec 2, 2022
The solution can improve in the development area and the customized applications.