IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity comparison

IBM and PTC are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. IBM is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.8, while PTC is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.5. IBM holds a 3.1% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 76% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC users who would recommend it.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...

Read 19 IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) reviews

1,404 Views
991 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

2,028 Views
1,597 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...

PTC Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 30, 2025

PTC Integrity and IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management compete in the realm of system and software development tools. While PTC Integrity excels in cost-effectiveness and customer support, IBM ELM holds the advantage with its extensive feature set.

Features: PTC Integrity is known for its scalable architecture, seamless integration with various development tools, and comprehensive traceability. IBM ELM provides a collaborative platform offering end-to-end lifecycle coverage, extensive requirements management, and change management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could enhance its user interface and expand its customization options. It would benefit from improved integration capabilities and more robust reporting features. IBM ELM might improve by simplifying its deployment process, offering more user-friendly customization, and streamlining its extensive documentation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PTC Integrity offers a straightforward deployment model with responsive customer service, simplifying the implementation process. IBM ELM provides robust documentation and a dedicated support network, which eases the complexity of deploying its comprehensive feature set.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity generally has lower setup costs and offers a quicker ROI, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. IBM ELM, despite a higher initial investment, provides long-term value with advanced features that could justify the cost for enterprises that prioritize comprehensive lifecycle management.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PTC Integrity

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Lifecycle M...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

13th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

11th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is 3.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.3%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Harold Pogue

Global IT Director of Digital Platforms. Digital and Connected Commerce at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

A complex deployment that is not stable, but is cloud-based

The team of 15 to 20 software engineers uses IBM Rational ALM and Jira for testing. They coupled different online packages together because the Duration Enterprise was impossible to use IBM Rational ALM did not help the organization and we ended up moving to another solution. The most valuable…

Read full review

Neha Wanjari

Technical Lead at KPIT Technologies

Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation

I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Everyone in a team can work on the same platform and share the same information."

"You can customize the board according to your needs."

"It is relatively easy to use and user-friendly once the setup is complete."

"The solution is customizable."

"The cataloging is a very valuable feature. For a lot of enterprises, they end up not knowing which applications do specific features. The cataloging helps with this. It's not that verbose, but it still gives you allowances to put in more detail."

"We have something called the GC (global configuration), which is a unique feature compared to any other competitor we have in the ALM space."

"The transition to a SaaS-based solution is a distinct advantage."

"It's easy to use."

More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) pros

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their products. Previously, customers were using different software to manage their products. However, PTC Integrity offers a solution for requirements management, test management, and even development to support live ticket management. So instead of using multiple software tools, we can use it for all these purposes."

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"I think nowadays people are getting into Jira and other tools. What is happening is, this solution is becoming more traditional, whereas Jira and other tools are more attractive for the new users to learn and start using because of the graphical interfaces."

"The product must be more user-friendly."

"The interconnectivity between packages is a major support problem and can be improved."

"The GUI is a little bit outdated."

"The reporting functionality needs to be improved."

"The features should be more intuitive. If I'm looking for something, its location should be easy to locate."

"One of the complaints from users is that they have to click buttons too many times for just a simple task. Changing this would lead to a better user experience."

"The stability of IBM Rational ALM could be improved."

More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) cons

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

"From my experience over the years, I believe there might be room for improvement in PTC Integrity. While it's already a good product, it tends to be slower than other software. When it becomes bulky, it slows down even more, sometimes leading to crashes or hangs that require restarting the computer before being able to use PTC Integrity again. This has been my experience multiple times."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to."

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

"There are not enough reports. People would like to see something similar to what is available in JIRA."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be reduced. Many of our customers are not using all the features and this could be why our clients feel the price is too high."

"This product is a little expensive and we had to pay extra to have them set it up for us."

"We have a contract, but I am not aware of the details."

"The solution is not cheap."

"IBM Rational ALM has both monthly and yearly licensing options."

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

25%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Rational ALM?

The solution is customizable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Rational ALM?

The user interface requires significant improvement as it is overly complex. For business users with no experience in IT, it can be particularly challenging to understand the UI and create test cas...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for IBM Rational ALM?

We use IBM Rational ALM as part of our overall application suite for our manufacturing company. It is used by our engineering team to capture requirements, perform testing, and manage defects. Spec...

See all answers

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 29% of the time

Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 18% of the time

Polarion ALM vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 11% of the time

Atlassian ALM vs IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) Competitors

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 61% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs PTC Integrity

Compared 4% of the time

Rally Software vs PTC Integrity

Compared 3% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM)

April 2025

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) report

Download IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) product report

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

March 2025

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

IBM Engineering Rhapsody, Rational ALM, MKS

MKS

Overview

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management stands out for its robust Agile Scrum planning, lifecycle traceability, and tool management, offering cloud-based configurability and strong collaboration features.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management provides rich capabilities for Agile project management, facilitating requirements and test management, configuration management, and version control. Its integration with IBM Doors supports comprehensive requirements handling, and the cloud-based platform enhances collaborative efficiency across teams. Despite needing advances in user-friendliness and reporting, ELM's global configuration and compliance features make it invaluable in demanding environments.

What are the key features of IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?

Scrum-based planning: Supports Agile methodologies with rich planning tools.
Lifecycle traceability: Offers complete traceability across development stages.
Customizable workflows: Adaptable workflows with Kanban for flexibility.
Git integration: Supports efficient version control and collaboration.
Global Configuration: Manages complex configurations globally.
Compliance and reporting: Ensures robust auditing and comprehensive reporting capabilities.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Collaboration: Enhanced sharing across platforms for seamless teamwork.
Cost-effectiveness: Delivers efficient tools that optimize project spend.
Comprehensive requirement handling: Facilitates detailed requirement management through IBM Doors integration.

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management is vital in sectors like automotive and manufacturing, where it implements Agile frameworks to manage requirements, conduct testing, and handle defects. It integrates into development pipelines ensuring live traceability and visibility, supporting critical engineering processes efficiently.

IBM

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Sample Customers

Tennis Australia, WeCloud AB, Port Otago Limited, Logicalis US, Valmer, The Chevrolet Volt, Ashurst

TRW Automotive

Buyer's Guide

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PTC Integrity

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PTC Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.