Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Codebeamer vs IBM Engineering Workflow Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.2
Codebeamer reduces costs and administrative workload significantly, enhancing project collaboration and ROI, though ML Ops integration may be challenging.
Sentiment score
7.2
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosts productivity by 30%, enhancing team efficiency and leadership insights with user-friendly tracking features.
The solution has produced a return on investment.
Codebeamer saves time and money for certain use cases, such as AUTOSPICE implementations.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Codebeamer's customer support is strong with prompt responses, appreciated live chat, but documentation needs improvement, especially in Chinese.
Sentiment score
6.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers reliable, skilled support with effective local vendor assistance, though customization and forum support are limited.
If I raise an issue as high priority, I receive responses in six to eight hours.
For out-of-the-box support, the customer service from PTC is satisfactory.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Codebeamer stands out for its scalability, outperforming competitors, praised by enterprise users for flexible, efficient performance.
Sentiment score
7.0
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable and adaptable, with some integration challenges and performance improvement needs noted by users.
In a project, I have experienced up to 180 licenses running during peak times and as low as ten licenses during downtime without facing upgrade or downgrade issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Codebeamer is praised for its stability, with high ratings, despite occasional issues with version compatibility and server strain.
Sentiment score
6.7
IBM Engineering Workflow Management's stability varies with customizations, server factors, and deployment planning, affecting performance for some users.
Running it independently or with a bigger server generally doesn't cause any issues.
There were stability issues due to version compatibility.
 

Room For Improvement

Codebeamer needs better usability, industry features, integration, analytics, and market presence, especially in China, with improved UI and documentation.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management faces challenges in integration, customization, usability, vendor reliance, and requires enhanced tools and cloud adaptability.
Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
If terminology changes, modifications must be done manually or by exporting the document to Word or Excel, which is time-consuming.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
 

Setup Cost

Codebeamer is moderately priced with valuable modules, aligning with standards for enterprises seeking comprehensive ALM solutions.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers flexible licensing with complex yet worthwhile pricing, yielding strong ROI and excellent support.
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
 

Valuable Features

Codebeamer excels in traceability, integration, and ease of use, offering robust tools for project management and regulatory compliance.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management enhances software development with task linking, traceability, agile support, and seamless change management integration.
Codebeamer saves on time and resources with its web-based client, eliminating the need to install it on every system.
Its integration capability is very high, with almost eighty to eighty-five percent of integrations available readily out of the box, minimizing the need for specific integration-related work.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
 

Categories and Ranking

Codebeamer
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (10th)
IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (4th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (10th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. Codebeamer is designed for Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites and holds a mindshare of 8.2%, up 4.9% compared to last year.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management, on the other hand, focuses on Enterprise Agile Planning Tools, holds 1.1% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SHRINIVAS ALAGERI - PeerSpot reviewer
Built-in project management modules simplify processes while compatibility improvements are needed
Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill ( /products/ptc-windchill-reviews ) face compatibility issues with newer versions of Codebeamer, requiring users to downgrade Codebeamer to establish integration. The installation on Linux can be tricky, and backward compatibility needs enhancement. Also, Codebeamer struggles with some DevOps integrations and lacks AI features for enhanced user assistance.
Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
31%
Computer Software Company
14%
Healthcare Company
7%
Retailer
6%
Manufacturing Company
20%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about codeBeamer ALM?
The platform provided the flexibility to expand our business processes, accommodating or altering them to suit the requirements of a changing environment.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for codeBeamer ALM?
Codebeamer is on the expensive side, but it provides ready-made modules for standards like ASPICE and ISO 26262, which might justify the cost for customers looking for those solutions.
What needs improvement with codeBeamer ALM?
Codebeamer could improve its customization capabilities and integration options. For instance, older versions of PDM Windchill ( /products/ptc-windchill-reviews ) face compatibility issues with new...
What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
 

Also Known As

codeBeamer ALM
IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, Dassault
Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: March 2025.
842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.