ALM tools engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 20
2024-05-20T15:07:57Z
May 20, 2024
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance and other fees, we pay IBM about $1.2 million USD per year. The cost per token is around $115-$120.
This is not a cheap solution but it does include the standard support that IBM offers through their portal, and the support is good. IBM has multiple licensing models, and there is a floating license model, where you buy a fixed number of licenses and you pay for them no matter what. Then there's a flexible, token-based license, where you have, let's say,100 tokens, and based on your usage, these tokens will be distributed amongst users and you can scale up as necessary.
It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements. Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.
Learn what your peers think about IBM Engineering Workflow Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: October 2024.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of...
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
Customers need to pay for a license to use this product. It is not a free tool. We use a token-based licensing model, which is specific to IBM. We have about 7,800 tokens, and including maintenance and other fees, we pay IBM about $1.2 million USD per year. The cost per token is around $115-$120.
This is not a cheap solution but it does include the standard support that IBM offers through their portal, and the support is good. IBM has multiple licensing models, and there is a floating license model, where you buy a fixed number of licenses and you pay for them no matter what. Then there's a flexible, token-based license, where you have, let's say,100 tokens, and based on your usage, these tokens will be distributed amongst users and you can scale up as necessary.
We see the solution as cost-effective. You get what you pay for.
It's an expensive investment to make, so the decision should be driven on individual requirements. Licensing: The solution cost is high and should be brought down to increase competition.