Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosted productivity by 30%, enhancing efficiency, though exact ROI calculation remains unclear over five years.
Sentiment score
7.4
Users report positive returns from Microsoft Azure DevOps through enhanced productivity, team synchronization, and streamlined management and deployment processes.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
IBM's customer service is good; technical support varies, with some users preferring forums and local vendors over IBM support.
Sentiment score
7.0
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers satisfactory support, with comprehensive documentation and online resources aiding users in resolving issues independently.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable and flexible but faces mixed reviews, especially regarding its reporting server and integration capabilities.
No sentiment score available
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM Engineering Workflow Management exhibits variable stability, with newer versions praised but challenges noted in customized deployments needing close monitoring.
No sentiment score available
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management struggles with complex UI, sluggish performance, limited customization, and lacks features compared to competitors.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is complex and costly, but users find it cost-effective with justified ROI despite high expenses.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers seamless task integration, comprehensive traceability, customizable reports, agile templates, and robust resource management features.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (5th)
Microsoft Azure DevOps
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
130
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (2nd), Release Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps is 42.3%, up from 39.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Akshat Prakash - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows us to deploy code to production without releasing certain features immediately and agile project management capabilities offer resource-leveling
My company has experienced benefits from using it or from recent updates in Azure Pipelines. For instance, we can manage different code versions from the same repository across different environments. We also use feature flags; the code is deployed, but the feature can be made visible to the end user at a later time. Additionally, as part of the deployment, we integrate automated and regression testing, which stops the deployment if testing fails, thus preventing regression bugs. This saves time and increases productivity by reducing the need for manual testing. Lastly, it integrates with the project management aspects, allowing us to link code deployments with project milestones. Azure DevOps supported our shift towards DevOps culture or practices. We shifted to the cloud environment and started migrating from our data centers about eight or nine years back. It has been a long journey. However, we have used Azure DevOps for almost five to six years in every project. We also use automation testing in Azure, so we have an integrated test suite that allows us to perform functional and regression testing effectively via the Azure DevOps system.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
21%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
It's becoming less relevant for us, as we move to cloud-based and more contemporary cloud-based SCM systems such as GitHub. As new JDKs have been released over the years, tooling support in new rel...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
Which is better - TFS or Azure DevOps?
TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very fri...
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Valuable features for project management and tracking in Azure DevOps include a portal displaying test results, check-in/check-out activity, and developer/tester productivity.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.