Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosts productivity by 30%, enhancing team efficiency and leadership insights with user-friendly tracking features.
Sentiment score
7.7
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management delivers high ROI through streamlined planning, enhanced decision-making, and application consolidation for mature organizations.
For organizations that haven't invested in people and processes, the product is underutilized and seen as overpriced.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers reliable, skilled support with effective local vendor assistance, though customization and forum support are limited.
Sentiment score
6.8
ServiceNow's support is generally positive, with some noting delays; training and documentation aid but needs vary.
They have knowledgeable teams across all levels.
While they have a skilled team, reaching the right resource can sometimes be a challenge.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable and adaptable, with some integration challenges and performance improvement needs noted by users.
Sentiment score
7.6
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management excels in scalability and adaptability, supporting diverse companies and departments, ideal for larger enterprises.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
IBM Engineering Workflow Management's stability varies with customizations, server factors, and deployment planning, affecting performance for some users.
Sentiment score
8.1
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is highly stable and reliable, with minor slowness during updates and customizable features.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management faces challenges in integration, customization, usability, vendor reliance, and requires enhanced tools and cloud adaptability.
ServiceNow SPM struggles with complexity, pricing, UI, integration, and lacks intuitive features, hindering user experience and satisfaction.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
Making the product more cost-beneficial would help more organizations consider investing in it.
It's not that the product lacks features, but rather organizations often adopt it at a maturity level beyond their capacity.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers flexible licensing with complex yet worthwhile pricing, yielding strong ROI and excellent support.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is costly, with variable pricing and additional fees, suitable for large enterprises' needs.
If a company is prepared to get a return on the investment, the price is worth it.
It's a bit costly currently.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management enhances software development with task linking, traceability, agile support, and seamless change management integration.
ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management excels with integration, flexible project management, and cost tracking, enhancing strategic decision-making and goal alignment.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
The platform consolidates multiple offerings into one module, eliminating the need to invest in siloed applications.
The most valuable features include managing our portfolio, getting a grip on demand in the environment, and making informed decisions about which projects would provide the greatest return.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
10th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (4th)
ServiceNow Strategic Portfo...
Ranking in Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
33
Ranking in other categories
Project Portfolio Management (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Enterprise Agile Planning Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Engineering Workflow Management is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management is 5.5%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Srinivasa Neelapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Strategies and goals are aligned with demands and partners, making it a strategic approach for the enterprise but the finance part needs improvement
SPM is definitely strong for project management, but its finance capabilities are not as robust. While there is a separate Financial Management product, it would be beneficial to have more out-of-the-box support for finance integrations within SPM. I’m not suggesting replacing systems like SAP for finance, but there should be better support for financial integrations. Currently, connecting to SaaS solutions is complicated, and getting into detailed financial calculations is challenging. Forecasting is manageable, but handling actual financials is not as straightforward. The finance area needs improvement, specifically making finance application integrations easier. Generic finance capabilities should be more user-friendly and integrated into SPM. Although they have started this journey, it hasn’t been fully released yet. There seems to be a roadmap, and once complete, it will be very useful. Additionally, incorporating a Q&A feature for entire strategies or project demands and enhancing text analytics within SPM would be beneficial.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
21%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Government
9%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
What do you like most about ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
We mainly use the solution to support operations and align our ITSM operations with our business goals. This involves coordinating between our application development, support teams, and network en...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
It's a bit costly currently. Efforts are being made to explore cost-benefit measures for investing in it.
What needs improvement with ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management?
There is always scope for improvement. As of now, making the product more cost-beneficial would help more organizations consider investing in it.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
IT Business Management, ServiceNow IT Business Management Suite, ServiceNow ITBM Suite, ServiceNow ITBM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Proximus, UNT SYSTEM, SAP SuccessFactors
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,690 professionals have used our research since 2012.