IBM Engineering Workflow Management and GitLab compete in software development management. GitLab has the upper hand thanks to its extensive feature set despite IBM's competitive pricing and support.
Features: IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers comprehensive change management and workflow capabilities that support well-coordinated process control and collaboration. Jazz Source Control provides isolated sandboxes for seamless code management and integration with tasks. It is valuable for managing stories, sprints, and releases, offering traceability and reporting from requirements to test cases. GitLab provides robust DevOps integrations and excels with its CI/CD pipeline support, simplifying configurations and deployment. It integrates source-code repository management with development, offering a streamlined architecture for modern practices.
Room for Improvement: IBM sometimes faces challenges with deployment ease, requiring structured planning and potential upfront investments. Users might also benefit from enhanced user interface updates to match current usability standards and feature sets. It would be helpful for IBM to simplify integrations and enhance flexibility. GitLab's vast feature set might be overwhelming, creating a steep learning curve for new users. Its user interface could benefit from refinement for more intuitive operations. Enhanced built-in analytics and reporting could better aid those unfamiliar with external tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Engineering Workflow Management requires meticulous deployment planning but offers strong customer support, addressing complex process and system requirements. GitLab is praised for its ease of deployment across cloud-based and on-premises environments, supported by a large online community and abundant resources. While IBM's customer support is robust, GitLab's flexible deployment options and community resources make it notably adaptable.
Pricing and ROI: IBM Engineering Workflow Management involves notable setup costs yet promises significant ROI through structured process management. GitLab offers more flexible pricing with a potentially faster ROI, leveraging open-source components and broad feature availability. The flexibility in GitLab's pricing and quicker returns make it appealing for diverse development teams and practices, optimizing cost-efficiency for varying scales.
We have saved time significantly, reducing deployment time from four hours to five minutes per deployment.
Migrating to GitLab is bringing time-saving benefits, and everything is easier to automate.
I have interacted with architects for some advice during the implementation, and they were prompt in their response.
I have had meetings where they taught me, explained things, and provided guidance for starting from scratch.
We have rarely needed to escalate issues to technical support since GitLab usually runs seamlessly.
It has all the features required for our coding and deployment needs, which makes it scalable to our changing requirements.
We're transitioning to OpenShift for future scalability with increased user numbers.
I have not encountered any performance or stability issues with GitLab so far.
It would be beneficial to have a user-friendly interface for setting up these configurations, instead of just writing YAML files.
GitLab can improve its user interface to make conflict resolution more user-friendly.
The UI has remained the same for a couple of years and could benefit from an update with AI features and better customization.
Improved graphics in terms of metrics and connectivity to SharePoint from Microsoft products would be beneficial.
Even when working in other small organizations, we opted for GitLab as it was cost-efficient.
The price is high, and it limits user accessibility.
The pricing of GitLab is reasonable, aligning with what I consider to be average compared to competitors.
As we implement automated testing and DevSecOps, it speeds up the process by forty to sixty percent.
The Ultimate version offers enhanced features for security scanning through DAST and SAST analysis, which have greatly benefitted our project workflow.
The feature I appreciate the most about GitLab is its ease of use and compatibility, which allows for straightforward building and deployment processes.
It provides more efficiencies for our scrum team, ensures everyone is on the same page, and offers leadership insight into progress.
GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster.
It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring.
With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.
IBM Engineering Workflow Management manages plans, tasks, the project status and acts as the critical link between required and delivered work. It provides flexibility to adapt to any process, which enables companies to adopt faster release cycles and manage dependencies across both small and complex development projects. This solution offers no-charge server software and flexible pricing models. It becomes a complete IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management solution—when purchased as a set of seamlessly integrated tools: IBM Engineering Workflow Management, IBM Engineering Test Management, and IBM Engineering Requirements Management DOORS Next.
We monitor all Enterprise Agile Planning Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
