Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs Jira comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
IBM Engineering Workflow Management boosted productivity by 30%, enhancing efficiency, though exact ROI calculation remains unclear over five years.
Sentiment score
7.3
Jira enhances efficiency and productivity, offering quick ROI and integration, though opinions on updates and support are mixed.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.9
IBM's customer service is good; technical support varies, with some users preferring forums and local vendors over IBM support.
Sentiment score
6.7
Atlassian's documentation and forums often suffice, but customer support has mixed reviews on responsiveness and problem-solving effectiveness.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.0
IBM Engineering Workflow Management is scalable and flexible but faces mixed reviews, especially regarding its reporting server and integration capabilities.
Sentiment score
7.3
Jira is scalable with planning, though some face performance issues and integration concerns as demands grow.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
IBM Engineering Workflow Management exhibits variable stability, with newer versions praised but challenges noted in customized deployments needing close monitoring.
Sentiment score
7.6
Jira is praised for its stability and performance, with occasional issues mostly related to server setups or customizations.
 

Room For Improvement

IBM Engineering Workflow Management struggles with complex UI, sluggish performance, limited customization, and lacks features compared to competitors.
Jira's complex interface, limited features, and high costs hinder usability, requiring improvements in performance, integration, and customization.
 

Setup Cost

IBM Engineering Workflow Management is complex and costly, but users find it cost-effective with justified ROI despite high expenses.
Jira offers flexible, moderately priced licensing with subscription options, but costs can rise with plugins and large deployments.
 

Valuable Features

IBM Engineering Workflow Management offers seamless task integration, comprehensive traceability, customizable reports, agile templates, and robust resource management features.
Jira provides robust project management, Agile support, and integrations, enhancing team collaboration with customizable workflows and a user-friendly interface.
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Engineering Workflow Ma...
Average Rating
6.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
Software Configuration Management (5th), Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (10th)
Jira
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
274
Ranking in other categories
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites (1st), Application Requirements Management (2nd), Project Management Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Application Lifecycle Management solutions, they serve different purposes. IBM Engineering Workflow Management is designed for Enterprise Agile Planning Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.9%, up 0.9% compared to last year.
Jira, on the other hand, focuses on Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites, holds 23.7% mindshare, up 23.6% since last year.
Enterprise Agile Planning Tools
Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
 

Featured Reviews

Suvajit Chakraborty - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good traceability elements but UI needs improvement
There is room for improvement in the UI. The UI has to improve a lot compared to the competitive tools, like Atlassian Jira, for example. It's very easy to use. It is easy to manage and easy to use. Anybody can learn it right quickly and start with it. But IBM ELM is something where somebody has to have good knowledge, training, and understanding and then only start using it. But there's a big known knowledge curve for IBM ELM. But once that is there, it's normally; organizations do have their own internal team to basically manage it IBM ELM portfolio, the tool chain. So if they have internal teams who are doing it for quite some time, not something new, then it is definitely better. But if there's if somebody is starting new, definitely there is a knowledge curve time it can take at least a year or maybe a couple of years before they can start realizing the benefits.
Saroj Ekka - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good repository integration, sprint board and easy to set up
There are some features and reports we need that are not there. For example, if I have to find out the capacity of the current sprint by user and compare it with the previous sprint, that visibility isn't there. We can know the capacity and what happened with the whole sprint, but not for an individual person to see where it's falling and how it's tracking. Report and analytics capabilities are important for a product manager. That visibility is important, so we use Jira. Some of the features are there, and I use my own Excels or other data things to compensate for that.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Agile Planning Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
21%
Government
15%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Educational Organization
51%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
We can track the status of test cases (passed or saved) in a single view. Based on releases and other attributes, we generate various reports and extract metrics from the data.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
I've heard IBM Engineering Workflow Management is more expensive than other tools. On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.
What needs improvement with IBM Engineering Workflow Management?
It's becoming less relevant for us, as we move to cloud-based and more contemporary cloud-based SCM systems such as GitHub. As new JDKs have been released over the years, tooling support in new rel...
Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?
Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...
Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?
Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?
We operate under a nonlimited license with Jira, allowing a number of users to access it with a single enterprise license.
 

Also Known As

IBM Rational Team Concert (IBM ALM), IBM RTC
Jira Software
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Telstra Corporation, Visteon, Atos SE, Panasonic Automotive Systems, IBM Global Technology Services, CareCore National, JTEKT Corp., ItaÒ BBA, Avea, CACEIS, Danske Bank Group, APIS IT
Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Engineering Workflow Management vs. Jira and other solutions. Updated: March 2023.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.