Jira vs OpenText ALM Octane comparison

Atlassian and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. Atlassian is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. Atlassian holds a 23.5% mindshare in ALM, compared to OpenText’s 6.2% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Jira

Read 266 Jira reviews

19,286 Views
12,992 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM Octane

Read 40 OpenText ALM Octane reviews

6,049 Views
3,226 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Jira

OpenText ALM Octane

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Jira and OpenText ALM Octane are key players in project management and application lifecycle management. Jira seems to have an edge due to its competitive pricing and ease of use, while OpenText ALM Octane impresses with its comprehensive features for those needing extensive functionality.

Features: Jira is known for its robust customization options, integration capabilities, and agile project management support. OpenText ALM Octane provides end-to-end lifecycle management, extensive testing features, and support for complex projects, along with advanced reporting and analytics.

Room for Improvement: Jira users suggest enhancements in performance speed, reporting interfaces, and scalability. OpenText ALM Octane users look for improved integration options, simplified configurations, and better scalability to meet evolving project demands.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jira is easy to deploy with straightforward installation and reliable support. OpenText ALM Octane requires a steeper learning curve but offers in-depth training and dedicated customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Jira is cost-effective with a solid ROI, balancing feature-rich offerings at a lower cost. OpenText ALM Octane is more expensive but viewed as a worthwhile investment due to its advanced features and long-term benefits, delivering superior value with its lifecycle management capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Jira vs. OpenText ALM Octane Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. OpenText ALM Octane

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Jira

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

266

Ranking in other categories

Application Requirements Management (2nd), Project Management Software (4th)

OpenText ALM Octane

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of Jira is 23.5%, down from 23.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ALM Octane is 6.2%, up from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Saroj Ekka

Technical Delivery Lead at Applied Materials

Apr 10, 2024

Offers good repository integration, sprint board and easy to set up

There are some features and reports we need that are not there. For example, if I have to find out the capacity of the current sprint by user and compare it with the previous sprint, that visibility isn't there. We can know the capacity and what happened with the whole sprint, but not for an individual person to see where it's falling and how it's tracking. Report and analytics capabilities are important for a product manager. That visibility is important, so we use Jira. Some of the features are there, and I use my own Excels or other data things to compensate for that.

Read full review

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

Nov 16, 2023

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

My company has several scrum teams, so we use OpenText ALM Octane for sprint planning. My company also uses OpenText ALM Octane for test management, quality management, requirements management, deployments, engineering purposes, and some automated testing The most valuable feature of the solution…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is project management."

"I like that all of the team members on an agile team can use it. No one is in a separate application."

"The customization and tailoring of the workflows have proven to be very useful."

"With the help of Jira, tasks are less likely to remain stagnant for a long time. We always see them somewhere on the board."

"Jira queries can be used for different types of deployment automation processes."

"Jira is very user friendly, easy to install, and easy to access."

"Integration is good."

"Offers a common language set so we can bring people into projects and get them up and running almost immediately."

More Jira pros

"The way testing is closely tied into the product Backlog has made it more intuitive, or easier to manage the relationship between building out an application and testing it. In other tools, that is more segregated. The way it's designed in Octane, people have said it makes more sense to them, and that it's easier for them to understand their data and to maintain and test their solutions."

"The defect management gives us full-fledged capabilities for handling defects, including capturing the details of the defects and even screenshotting the defect cases. The defect management is comprehensive."

"The filtering options are very good once you learn them. The document reports are also valuable. You can create reports in Word and PDF formats. That's very useful."

"People really how easy it is to customize. In some previous tools, that has been very limited, or you had to know how to write code to do some of the customizations, or it was very confusing. Going back to the user interface, they've made the customization of the tool, the workspace settings, very easy for people to figure out and use."

"There are a lot of predefined reports. We can attach additional reports for users, like who worked on what defect and when, as well as what is the status of the release compared to the previous release. It is really endless. All the data is really linked together. Then, if all the data is linked together, there is an option to prepare reports out of it. We are very impressed with its reporting capabilities."

"The most important feature is the integration among all the different features in just one tool: Agile management system, requirements management system, test management, defects management, automatic test execution. Really, if you're looking at other tools, you will never find all that integrated into just one tool with all the traceability, with all the elements in just one place."

"We like Micro Focus ALM Octane because its performance is okay, and its stability is okay, so we use it a lot. The platform is easy to use."

"The most useful feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the dashboards, they are easy to use."

More OpenText ALM Octane pros

Cons

"Its UI can be improved a little bit. I know this a business tool and not a commercial tool, but it could be a little bit more interactive like the HP ALM/Quality Center, which provides you the results of graphs and gives you a lot of visual representations. I feel Jira lacks a little bit in this aspect."

"In Jira, sometimes developers are not getting alerts when Jira is moving out of the SLA to the product development team."

"Sometimes, it is slow and hangs. We faced some stability issues where JIRA was down for a day. Also, we have lost some of our comments made in the JIRA because of downtime."

"I want the tool to integrate connectors."

"Sometimes the solution doesn't communicate well with other platforms. It's quite difficult to integrate things and make the data flow from A to B, to Jira, and then back to other areas."

"I would love to have more features to make nice documents, like Release Notes or a feature overview, right from JIRA."

"It should be less expensive."

"I would like to see visualization of release planning. I can list the releases and I can give dates to releases, but to show how they are happening on a timeline, I would need to order the Portfolio part. But just for this, it may be too much to use the Portfolio for that."

More Jira cons

"We have some requests to beef up the manual testing abilities and the ability to report on testing progress. All the basics are there, but there's an issue of maintainability. For example... once you plan a test and it creates a run, more particularly a suite run, you can't edit the suite run afterward... That that is not realistic with how people work. Mistakes are made and people are humans and we change our minds about things. So the tool needs to allow for a bit more flexibility in that testing area, as well as some better widgets to report on progress."

"Currently, Micro Focus ALM Octane is considered an old-world tool in the industry and lacks the perception of being a new-age tool among its customers."

"We've only had a few stability issues. Generally, we have issues following any deployment they do, so if they do a deployment on a Sunday, then we may have a couple of issues on a Monday or Tuesday."

"The Requirements Module could be better, to build up a better requirements process. There's a huge improvement from ALM.NET to Octane, but it's still not really facilitating all the needs of the product owners, to set up their requirements in Octane."

"I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"The limitation of Octane is that we can't do a release outside of the sprint. We can only plan the release in the sprint. With Agile and JIRA tools, we can plan the release outside the sprint and do a global release of all the projects from the sprint."

"The reporting needs to be improved and allow for customization. I want to build my own widgets, but I don't want to use the ones already in the system. I want to build mine from scratch."

"I like their smart analytics; perhaps they should continue to expand and improve there because it's a fantastic start."

More OpenText ALM Octane cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Compared to the value Jira provides, it’s not that expensive. It has an yearly licensing cost."

"The standard package of Jira is for 100 users. They should offer more packages for other increments, such as 500 or 2,000. In my previous company, there was a free package that provided a minimal number of users."

"It is not too expensive. It is just comparative to other tools like Microsoft Teams."

"It does not cost that much."

"The licensing model is annoying. They nickel and dime you."

"We are on an annual license to use Jira."

"We are using the enterprise license which is nice because it ensures that we always have the latest versions of Jira software."

"Worth the extra cost."

More Jira pricing and cost advice

"It's pretty pricey, one of the most expensive ones on the market... The value depends on if you use all the features that it has. It comes with a lot of features. The difference between the license structure of ALM and Octane versus JIRA, is that you get everything with ALM and Octane... For JIRA, you buy the pieces one piece at a time."

"The comparison is always with Jira, so the pricing of Octane is a bit on the higher side. But if you look at what you have to add to Jira, on the plug-in side, to have the same abilities you have with Octane, you're more or less even, or even ahead with Octane."

"I rate the product price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive. The product is neither cheap nor expensive."

"The solution has reduced our testing costs."

"I would say that it is an affordable product. There is an annual service fee, which is one of the additional payments to be made apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."

"There is a conversion fee for changing licenses."

"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."

"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."

More OpenText ALM Octane pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Harshal Vora

Principal Solutions Architect at InfoStretch

Apr 19, 2023

Which tool is integrated better with Jira - Micro Focus ALM Quality Center or TestRail by Gurock?

ALM Octane integrates easily out of the box with Jira, additionally, once you DevSecOps users are onboard to Octane, they will realize Octane does more, so they can reduce their dependence on Jira. Several of my customers have come to this realization. Octane is an Enterprise solution, but Jira is not.

See 2 answers

Evgeny Belenky

Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

Nov 16, 2021

Hello @Vishwa-Reddy, @GeorgNauerz, @Agne Gecevice and @reviewer1154316, Can you please help @Harshal Vora with their question?

Read full answer

reviewer1933914

Business Consultant at MFGS, Inc.

Apr 19, 2023

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

50%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

Which is better - Jira or Microsoft Azure DevOps?

Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalabl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jira?

The product is quite expensive. It costs approximately 1.2 million rand per year. It's a fixed price, depending on the modules that you get. You have specific tools, that's what you pay for. I rate...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The tool's price is extremely high. When I was using Micro Focus, there were ten licenses, costing around 1,38,000, which was outrageous.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The tool's price is high, making it an area where improvement is high.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Jira

Compared 22% of the time

IBM DOORS vs Jira

Compared 10% of the time

Rally Software vs Jira

Compared 7% of the time

Polarion ALM vs Jira

Compared 6% of the time

TFS vs Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Jira Competitors

OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 11% of the time

TFS vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 2% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 2% of the time

Codebeamer vs OpenText ALM Octane

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText ALM Octane Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jira

November 2024

Download Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM Octane

November 2024

Download OpenText ALM Octane product report

Also Known As

Jira Software

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

Learn More

Atlassian

OpenText

Overview

Jira is a powerful cloud- and subscription-based application lifecycle and issue management solution. It is designed to aid users both in project management and in resolving any issues that arise at any point in the software development process. It is especially concerned with easing the ability of developers to collaborate.

Jira Benefits

Some of the ways that organizations can benefit by choosing to deploy Jira include:

DevOps lifecycle visibility and planning. Jira provides application developers with tools that enable them to track and visualize where they are in the development process. This means that a DevOps team can measure their progress at all times. Jira’s roadmapping feature also enables a DevOps team to work more efficiently by setting goals for their projects, keeping them on track. Additionally, they are able to track whether they are meeting the goals that they set for their projects.

Regular product updates. Atlassian is constantly updating Jira so that it is continuously evolving into an ever more powerful and user-friendly solution. Users can be sure that the product that they are using is always being tweaked so as to provide them with the best possible project management solution.

Flexibility. Jira enables users to customize their workflows and dashboard so that the solution is operating in a way that best matches their needs. Jira can also integrate with more than 3,000 other applications and integrations. Organizations can use it to expand their project management and DevOps capabilities in many different ways.

Jira Features

Security capabilities. Jira is equipped with a number of useful security features. It gives administrators the ability to restrict access to certain tools so that only users who are authorized to complete certain tasks have access to the tools related to the completion of that task. Users can also set default permissions so that only particular users can work on new projects or particular projects.

Real-time notification feature. Users can set Jira so that it offers them notifications that contain critical information in real time. It can send users email notifications when pressing issues have been updated. They can also set it to notify them about tasks that may be due, or other similar events.
Activity log. Jira has the ability to track any and all changes that are taking place within the software framework. Users can keep a close eye on everything that is going on. This promotes a high level of visibility and can be leveraged to aid developers in their collaboration efforts.

Reviews from Real Users

Jira is a powerful solution that stands out when compared to many of its competitors. Two major advantages it offers are its workflow engine and its highly customizable dashboard.

Bharath R., the tool implementation and project management lead at a financial services firm, writes, “I feel the strongest feature of Jira is its workflow engine. It empowers us to automate our workflows within our organization. It's the one characteristic of Jira which I think can help any organization, be it in any domain.”

Uday J., a staff engineer at a computer company, says, “Another thing that I like a lot about Jira is that in the dashboard, you can plug the modules that you want. You can enable certain sections. For example, you can show trend history, open Jira tickets, etc. Some of the managers have created a dashboard for each engineer.”

OpenText ALM Octane helps organizations implement a “quality everywhere” approach and improve Agile and DevOps development and testing processes to improve the flow of work across the software delivery value stream. You can tightly align quality efforts from development to release, employ a broad range of tests anchored by automation, and continuously monitor and improve for increased throughput. OpenText fosters an open approach so that quality is visible, traceable, and continuously improved. By synchronizing quality and testing with Agile and DevOps processes, risks are mitigated early in the software delivery value stream – speeding the way for faster delivery and improved customer satisfaction.

ALM Octane facilitates a tailored and scalable approach for large enterprises. You can deploy your way and minimize infrastructure needs with deployment options spanning on-premises, SaaS, and public cloud (Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure Marketplaces). Similarly, various licensing options can tailor the features to meet specific needs with support for thousands of concurrent users in geographically disperse locations.

Sample Customers

Square, Nasa, eBay, Cisco, SalesForce, Adobe, BNP Paribas, BMW and LinkedIn, Pfizer, Citi.

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

Buyer's Guide

Jira vs. OpenText ALM Octane

October 2024

Free Report: Jira vs. OpenText ALM Octane

Find out what your peers are saying about Jira vs. OpenText ALM Octane and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jira vs. OpenText ALM Octane report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.