Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Informatica Data Engineering Streaming vs Informatica PowerCenter comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Informatica Data Engineerin...
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Streaming Analytics (16th)
Informatica PowerCenter
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
80
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (2nd), Data Visualization (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Informatica Data Engineering Streaming and Informatica PowerCenter aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Informatica Data Engineering Streaming is designed for Streaming Analytics and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.8% compared to last year.
Informatica PowerCenter, on the other hand, focuses on Data Integration, holds 10.9% mindshare, up 10.1% since last year.
Streaming Analytics
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

DK
May 16, 2024
Helps with real-time data processing and improves decision-making overall
We implement business intelligence solutions, including data warehousing tools, data integration to load data into warehouses, and then creating reports It improves decision-making overall for the company. Informatica is usually the tool for setting up the data, streaming the data into your data…
Lars Borchers - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 4, 2023
A stable and reliable product that provides a variety of features for data integration
We use the product for everything that's possible in data integration. We have a data warehouse, and we load each stage. We use the product for data exchange and API services. We also use it to load data into cloud platforms and generate Customer Letters The reliability of the product and the way…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It improves the performance."
"It is easy to use, and it is quick for developing things. It is fairly powerful, and it can integrate with a lot of different platforms without much hassle."
"I found the map links, work links, and workflows valuable. They are important features."
"Good product if you are trying implement data quality, data integration, and data management projects."
"The technical support for Informatica PowerCenter is good."
"Informatica PowerCenter is very good for integrating a huge amount of data in a very short duration, such as a minute. It is also very easy to use. After you provide the source and the target, mappings are automatically done, which makes it easy to use for the development team."
"The features I find most valuable is that the solution is very user-friendly and the graphical design is very easy to understand."
"Deployment was simple and straightforward."
"Ease and speed of building integrations, especially integrations between different applications, such as our Hospital Information System."
 

Cons

"Skill requirement is required. There is a learning curve."
"I would like to see improvements made to the custom transformations. It should be more open for users that want to write their own code and use cases."
"Include more instruments for LOGs analysis, interpretation, and job corrections."
"It would be nice to have all tools in one place. CDC needs more effort, as it's only easy to develop if you are familiar with Linux."
"The solution can improve by providing more connectivity by having native ODBC or JDBC connections available. It will be easier and more people could start using it."
"Informatica PowerCenter is outdated and would benefit from modernization. They should have a very good migration strategy from Informatica PowerCenter to AACF. Informatica PowerCenter there is no point in using it, you have to use a cloud version."
"Some of the conversions are done inside the product. We use work tables that are created by the engine itself, but the names of the work tables are very long, and they don't have any meaning, which makes it a bit difficult to understand and follow exactly what is happening inside."
"They should release new versions for the solution's on-premises setup."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, considering the fact that the present licensing charges of the tool are expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The license model is CPU based."
"The solution is in the middle price range compared to other solutions."
"I consider this to be an expensive product."
"The pricing is a little expensive, but in the same range as IBM and other competitors."
"I am not sure about the most recent price, but I think it should be $100,000 or more."
"Price-wise, it's more expensive than SSIS, but it's a better tool, so it has more features. Licensing is on a yearly basis."
"We are satisfied with the pricing."
"The pricing for Informatica PowerCenter is expensive. Some clients have simple needs and only want to integrate and store data. Some clients have small needs, while some clients have bigger needs and focus more on performance and time. The licensing cost for Informatica PowerCenter isn't good. In my project, if I remember correctly, the company pays €20,000 per year for the Informatica PowerCenter license. I'm not aware of additional costs that you need to pay for some features of the solution. On a scale of one to five, I'm rating its price a three."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user90069 - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 20, 2014
Informatica PowerCenter vs. Microsoft SSIS - each technology has its advantages but also have similarities
Technology has made it easier for businesses to organize and manipulate data to get a clearer picture of what’s going on with their business. Notably, ETL tools have made managing huge amounts of data significantly easier and faster, boosting many organizations’ business intelligence operations…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Informatica Data Engineering Streaming?
Skill requirement is required. There is a learning curve.
What is your primary use case for Informatica Data Engineering Streaming?
We implement business intelligence solutions, including data warehousing tools, data integration to load data into warehouses, and then creating reports.
What advice do you have for others considering Informatica Data Engineering Streaming?
Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. Usually, Informatica is for big clients because of its pricing, and it also requires some skill sets. It requires investment into a proper da...
How does Azure Data Factory compare with Informatica PowerCenter?
Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up an...
Which is better - SSIS or Informatica PowerCenter?
SSIS PowerPack is a group of drag and drop connectors for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, commonly called SSIS. The collection helps organizations boost productivity with code-free compo...
Which Informatica product would you choose - PowerCenter or Cloud Data Integration?
Complex transformations can easily be achieved using PowerCenter, which has all the features and tools to establish a real data governance strategy. Additionally, PowerCenter is able to manage huge...
 

Also Known As

Big Data Streaming, Informatica Intelligent Streaming, Intelligent Streaming
PowerCenter
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Jewelry TV
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, LexisNexis, Rabobank
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.