Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Lacework vs SUSE Rancher comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Container Security
5th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
87
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (5th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (4th), Compliance Management (4th)
Lacework
Ranking in Container Security
11th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (13th), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (10th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (11th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (9th), Compliance Management (7th)
SUSE Rancher
Ranking in Container Security
34th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lacework is 2.9%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE Rancher is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Security
 

Featured Reviews

RAJ BATTIN - PeerSpot reviewer
May 10, 2024
Helps identify vulnerabilities, is easy to use, and improves our risk posture
I would rate the ease of use a seven out of ten. The Proof of exploitability in evidence-based reporting helps us during our investigations. The IaC scanning helps identify preproduction issues. By analyzing alerts from various channels against our defined security policies, Singularity Cloud Security significantly reduces false positives. This allows our team to focus on real threats, and when a rare false positive does occur, we can quickly notify the security team to refine the relevant policy. Our false positives have been reduced by over 80 percent. It has improved our risk posture. Singularity Cloud Security has improved our mean time to detect by 20 percent and has improved our remediation time by allowing us to see the details of the vulnerabilities in one place. Singularity Cloud Security has saved our engineers around 25 minutes of time.
SS
Dec 29, 2022
Helps us detect things based on severity and to focus on the critical and high-severity issues
There are many valuable features that I use in my daily work. The first are alerts and the event dossier that it generates, based on the severity. That is very insightful and helps me to have a security cap in our infrastructure. The second thing I like is the agent-based vulnerability management, which is the most accurate information. It helps us to know what the security gaps or weaknesses are in the systems and to patch them. Finding a critical weak spot is one of the best features, with the agent-based scanner. We can check it out, based on a filter of the host or container, get the vulnerability report for that particular host, and just share it with the DevOps team to patch. For anomalous activities, Lacework has a good set of rules for detection and it gives super-informative alert information. For example, when an issue is detected that results in an alert, it doesn't just give the details. It also explains clearly what is happening, with "WH" questions. In the alert, if you click on "Why this alert has been detected," there is a clear explanation for it. Next, you can click on, "When," and it gives the time range of the detection time. The next is "What has been impacted?" That kind of accurate information means we don't have to look around or worry about the source of the information or the legitimacy of the alert.
Use SUSE Rancher?
Share your opinion

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I am not involved in the pricing, but it is cost-effective."
"It was reasonable pricing for me."
"I wasn't sure what to expect from the pricing, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that it was a little less than I thought."
"The cost for PingSafe is average when compared to other CSPM tools."
"We have an enterprise license. It is affordable. I'm not sure, but I think we pay 150,000 rupees per month."
"PingSafe is fairly priced."
"PingSafe falls within the typical price range for cloud security platforms."
"PingSafe's primary advantage is its ability to consolidate multiple tools into a single user interface, but, beyond this convenience, it may not offer significant additional benefits to justify its price."
"It is slightly expensive. It depends on how big your environment is, but it is expensive. Right now, we are spending a lot of money. We have covered all of the cloud providers and most of our colocation facilities as well, so we cannot complain, but it is slightly expensive. It is not super expensive."
"My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz."
"The licensing fee was approximately $80,000 USD, per year."
"The pricing has gotten better. That scenario was somewhat unstable. They have a rather interesting licensing structure. I believe you get 200 resources per "Lacework unit." It was difficult, in the beginning, to figure out exactly what a "resource" was... That was a problem until about a year or so ago. They have improved it and it has stabilized quite a bit."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
5%
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Retailer
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The price depends on the extension of the solution that you want to buy. If you want to buy just EDR, the price is le...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
I request that SentinelOne investigate this false positive, as SentinelOne has a higher false positive rate than othe...
How would you compare Wiz vs Lacework?
Wiz and Lacework sucks... Buy Orca.
What do you like most about Lacework?
Polygraph compliance is a valuable feature. In our perspective, it delivers significant benefits. The clarity it offe...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Lacework?
My smaller deployments cost around 200,000 a year, which is probably not as expensive as Wiz.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Polygraph
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
J.Crew, AdRoll, Snowflake, VMWare, Iterable, Pure Storage, TrueCar, NerdWallet, and more.
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, Veracode and others in Container Security. Updated: September 2024.
800,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.