Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs SUSE Rancher comparison

Microsoft and SUSE are both solutions in the Container Security category. Microsoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1, while SUSE is ranked #30 with an average rating of 7.0. Microsoft holds a 0.7% mindshare in Container Security, compared to SUSE’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SUSE users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) and SUSE Rancher based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SUSE Rancher Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SUSE Rancher

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,772 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Security category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 2.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is 0.7%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SUSE Rancher is 0.3%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Container Security

Featured Reviews

Andrew W

VP - Information Technology at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees

Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues

Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.

Read full review

Raymond De Rooij

Product Owner at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Scalability and flexibility but needs better support

We are using Azure Kubernetes Service as a customer. I cannot detail all the products and technologies we are using There isn't one specific feature of Azure Kubernetes Service that I can name as most valuable. It's part of a strategic solution yet I don't see an advantage compared to our…

Read full review

Sachin Deorah

Technical Architect at BORN Group

Enables seamless local Kubernetes development and quick deployment to the cloud

Rancher Desktop provides support for Kubernetes setup on local machines. It allows us to run Kubernetes as per our requirement, and the desktop application offers a good UI. We use Rancher Desktop for local development, testing APIs locally, and it helps to seamlessly publish to the cloud. This makes it a valuable tool for developers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It used to guide me about an alert. There is something called an alert guide. I used to click on the alert guide, and I could read everything. I could read about the alert and how to resolve it. I used to love that feature."

"The Offensive Security Engine, powered by impressive AI/ML capabilities, seamlessly integrates with cloud infrastructure to analyze data and provide optimal security solutions."

"It is pretty easy to integrate with this platform. When properly integrated, it monitors end-to-end."

"I rate SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security ten out of ten."

"The real-time detection and response capabilities overall are great."

"The cooperative nature of SentinelOne has influenced our decision not to shift."

"It's positively affected the communication between cloud security, application developers, and AppSec teams."

"PingSafe's graph explorer is a valuable tool that lets us visualize all connected services."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pros

"It is easy to deploy."

"I found the Helm deployment feature of the solution valuable."

"The setup was straightforward and it took one hour to deploy."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the diagnostic service."

"It is appealing to us due to its complexity, which aligns well with our requirements."

"The product serves the purpose of helping streamline our company's application deployment and scaling processes."

"The most valuable features of AKS are rollback updates, high availability, easy management, speedy execution and deployment."

"The product has built-in functionality that checks whether the service is available or not. In case the service is down, the tool will create a new instance by default. Hence, the web API will be always up irrespective of the server or the situation."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pros

"Rancher Desktop provides support for Kubernetes setup on local machines."

"The most valuable features of SUSE Rancher include the user interface and the display features."

"Rancher Desktop provides support for Kubernetes setup on local machines."

Cons

"Customized queries should be made easier to improve PingSafe."

"I believe the UI/UX updates for SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security have room for improvement."

"It would be really helpful if the solution improves its agent deployment process."

"We are getting reports only in a predefined form. I would like to have customized reports so that I can see how many issues are open or closed today or in two weeks."

"Maybe container runtime security could be improved."

"It took us a while to configure the software to work well in this type of environment, as the support documents were not always clear."

"The area of improvement is the cost, which is high compared to other traditional endpoint protections."

"SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security has limited legacy system support and may not fully support older operating systems or legacy environments."

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security cons

"If any customer uses a traditional code, the code-level changes take a lot of time."

"The initial setup of AKS is complicated. The setup depends on the cluster, nodes, and lots of other things. There are also lots of extremely critical small devices. Moreover, you will have to pay them even while setting up the solution. It is not like you setup first and then pay for it."

"The costs are rising rapidly, and we have not seen any cost reductions by moving to Azure."

"I would like to see Azure implement something like the K9 terminal for interacting with Kubernetes clusters. It's a user-friendly CLI interface."

"More control over Infra scanning can be introduced."

"There are a lot of features that should be included with the AKS."

"I am not impressed with the support services from Microsoft yet."

"There is room for improvement in automation processes, as well."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) cons

"Some initial setup and configuration were required by the admin side for enabling security policies, which were not supported initially."

"Additional features for a paid solution should be included, such as more detailed insights, better graphics, and an improved user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SentinelOne provided competitive pricing compared to other vendors, and we are satisfied with the deal."

"The tool is cost-effective."

"The pricing for PingSafe in India was more reasonable than other competitors."

"It's not expensive. The product is in its initial growth stages and appears more competitive compared to others. It comes in different variants, and I believe the enterprise version costs around $55 per user per year. I would rate it a five, somewhere fairly moderate."

"Pricing is based on modules, which was ideal for us."

"As a partner, we receive a discount on the licenses."

"It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market."

"The pricing is fair. It is not inexpensive, and it is also not expensive. When managing a large organization, it is going to be costly, but it meets the business needs. In terms of what is out there on the market, it is fair and comparable to what I have seen, so I do not have any complaints about the cost"

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security pricing and cost advice

"The control plane is free and we only pay for the usage and time."

"The product is expensive in terms of scalability."

"It is expensive compared to other vendors."

"The product follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model which is good for small enterprises. You need to pay only for the services that you use."

"I like the pricing and find it to be in the mid-range, and I would rate it as five out of ten."

"The product is expensive."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of the solution is dependent on the choice of virtual machines, specifically the amount of memory required. There are various options available, ranging from around twenty-five to even more choices to select from. This flexibility allows you to customize the pricing based on your specific needs. From my perspective, virtual machines in the cloud tend to be slightly more expensive compared to virtual machines offered directly by data centers. However, this cost is offset by the benefits of a managed service. Taking the overall picture into account, the managed service approach is advantageous. The pricing for the platform can vary, typically ranging from three hundred euros per month to two thousand euros per month, depending on the specific requirements and setup you choose."

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?

The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?

It is cost-effective compared to other solutions in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PingSafe?

The documentation could be better. Besides improving the documentation, obtaining a professional or partner specializ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

One improvement I'd like to see is a better user interface for developers, enabling easier operation without relying ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?

My primary use case is building and deploying solutions using multiple Azure services. I combine these services to bu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SUSE Rancher?

Rancher is free of cost for us as it is open source. However, there might be costs involved when using Kubernetes on ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SUSE Rancher?

I believe additional features for a paid solution should be included, such as more detailed insights, better graphics...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SUSE Rancher?

My primary use case for SUSE Rancher is managing Kubernetes clusters, allocating them to different users, and monitor...

See all answers

Comparisons

Wiz vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 24% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 20% of the time

AWS GuardDuty vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 7% of the time

Orca Security vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

Compared 5% of the time

More SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security Competitors

Red Hat OpenShift vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 77% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable.io Container Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 4% of the time

Orca Security vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 2% of the time

Wiz vs Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

Compared 2% of the time

More Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) Competitors

SUSE NeuVector vs SUSE Rancher

Compared 24% of the time

Red Hat Advanced Cluster Security for Kubernetes vs SUSE Rancher

Compared 23% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs SUSE Rancher

Compared 17% of the time

More SUSE Rancher Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security

March 2025

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security report

Download SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security product report

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)

April 2025

Download Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) product report

Buyer's Guide

Container Security

April 2025

Download SUSE Rancher product report

Also Known As

PingSafe

No data available

Overview

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security protects cloud workloads, offering advanced threat detection and automated response. It integrates seamlessly with cloud environments and secures containerized applications and virtual machines against vulnerabilities.

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is renowned for its efficiency in mitigating threats in real-time. The platform integrates effortlessly with existing cloud environments, ensuring robust cloud security management with minimal manual intervention. Securing containerized applications and virtual machines, it excels in threat intelligence and endpoint protection. However, improvements are needed in performance during high workload periods, and more integrations with third-party tools and better documentation would be beneficial. Users often find the installation process complex, support response times slow, and the dashboard's navigation unintuitive.

What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Real-time Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats as they occur.
Automated Response: Automatically responds to threats to minimize impact.
Ease of Deployment: Simple setup process with scalable options.
Machine Learning Insights: AI-driven insights enhance threat prevention.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with cloud environments for unified security management.

What are the primary benefits or ROI to expect from SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security?

Enhanced Threat Mitigation: Improved security against real-time threats.
Reduced Manual Intervention: Automated processes save time and resources.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing security requirements.
Centralized Management: Manage security across platforms from a single console.
Advanced Threat Intelligence: Provides in-depth analysis and protection.

In specific industries, SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is implemented to safeguard critical data and infrastructure. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology depend on its real-time threat detection and automated response to protect sensitive information. Its ability to secure containerized applications and virtual machines is particularly valuable in dynamic environments where rapid scaling is necessary.

SentinelOne

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) is a fully managed container orchestration service provided by Microsoft Azure. It simplifies the deployment, management, and scaling of containerized applications using Kubernetes. With AKS, developers can focus on building applications while Azure takes care of the underlying infrastructure. It offers features like automatic scaling, monitoring, and security, ensuring high availability and reliability. AKS integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, enabling easy integration with existing workflows. It also provides a flexible and open-source environment, allowing developers to use their preferred tools and frameworks. With AKS, organizations can accelerate their application development and deployment processes, while reducing operational overheads.

Microsoft

SUSE Rancher manages and deploys Kubernetes clusters, simplifies container orchestration, and enhances DevOps practices, supporting multi-cloud environments and facilitating application scalability and monitoring.

SUSE Rancher provides robust Kubernetes cluster management and seamless integration with different tools and platforms, making it valuable for complex cloud infrastructures. It aids in automating workflows, ensuring consistent application performance across environments, and enhancing security with reliable RBAC. It simplifies operations with automated updates and comprehensive monitoring tools, supporting multiple Kubernetes distributions. SUSE Rancher offers centralized management of clusters with an intuitive experience, though it may benefit from better stability, performance optimizations, and improved documentation clarity.

What are the important features?

Robust Kubernetes Cluster Management: Centralized management for multiple Kubernetes clusters.
Seamless Integration: Smooth integration with different tools and platforms.
Scalability: Facilitates application scalability across environments.
Automated Updates: Simplifies operations with automated updates.
Monitoring Tools: Comprehensive tools for monitoring clusters.
Security: Enhanced security features with reliable RBAC.
Extensive Documentation: Well-documented support and community resources.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Improved Efficiency: Automates workflows, reducing manual tasks.
Consistent Performance: Ensures consistent application performance across environments.
Centralized Management: Simplifies the management of complex cloud infrastructures.
Enhanced Security: Provides robust security with RBAC.
Scalability: Supports scalable application deployments in multi-cloud environments.

SUSE Rancher is implemented in various industries where managing Kubernetes clusters and ensuring application scalability are critical. It supports complex cloud infrastructures, automating workflows, and integrating seamlessly with different tools, enhancing overall operational efficiency and security. In industries needing consistent performance and centralized management, SUSE Rancher proves to be an invaluable tool.

SUSE

Buyer's Guide

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SUSE Rancher

March 2025

Free Report: Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SUSE Rancher

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SUSE Rancher and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,772 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs. SUSE Rancher report.

See our list of best Container Security vendors.

We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.