Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.6
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security boosts productivity, improves threat detection, saves costs, and enhances security operations with seamless integration.
Sentiment score
8.1
Azure Kubernetes Service yields high ROI with cost-effective scaling and OS savings, despite initial adaptation challenges.
Sentiment score
7.8
Red Hat OpenShift boosts efficiency, reduces costs, and offers swift ROI with enhanced scalability and integration over VMware.
The detailed information PingSafe gives about how to fix vulnerabilities reduces the time spent on remediation by about 70 to 80 percent.
After implementing SentinelOne, it takes about five to seven minutes.
Our ability to get in and review our vulnerability stance, whether daily, monthly, weekly, or whatever it might be, has drastically improved over our prior provider.
With OpenShift combined with IBM Cloud App integration, I can spin an integration server in a second as compared to traditional methods, which could take days or weeks.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.5
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers reliable support with quick response times, knowledgeable assistance, and effective issue resolution, despite occasional variations.
Sentiment score
6.0
Azure Kubernetes Service support is generally good but criticized for slow responses to critical issues and initial basic queries.
Sentiment score
6.7
Red Hat OpenShift customer service is praised for effectiveness but faces challenges with response times and documentation navigation.
When we send an email, they respond quickly and proactively provide solutions.
They took direct responsibility for the system and could solve queries quickly.
Having a reliable team ready and willing to assist with any issues is essential.
We have dealt with many cases with Red Hat support, and while they eventually solve issues, it sometimes takes them a long time to reach a resolution, particularly with complex matters related to IBM Cloud.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
9.0
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers scalable, flexible cloud-based deployment, efficiently supporting various environments with seamless multi-tenancy and auto-scaling.
Sentiment score
8.1
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) offers scalable, adaptable auto-scaling features, suitable for medium to large organizations with distributed data centers.
Sentiment score
7.5
Red Hat OpenShift excels in scalability, with efficient management and expansion, but costs may challenge smaller on-premise businesses.
As soon as we need to add somebody, we just add them to NinjaOne, and then we have a script set up where it automatically deploys and adds them to whichever group we need.
I would rate it a 10 out of 10 for scalability.
Scalability is no longer a concern because Cloud Native Security is a fully cloud-based resource.
AKS offers excellent scalability due to its adaptation from Kubernetes.
OpenShift's horizontal pod scaling is more effective and efficient than that used in Kubernetes, making it a superior choice for scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is reliable and stable, but some users note UI lag and communication challenges.
Sentiment score
7.3
Azure Kubernetes Service is stable with high ratings, featuring self-healing, reliability, and minimal serious issues despite occasional challenges.
Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat OpenShift is recognized for its stability and maturity, though it demands high resources and has occasional minor issues.
In my experience, there has been 100 percent uptime.
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud is incredibly reliable.
The cloud console is very resilient.
From my usage, I would rate its stability as eight to nine out of ten.
It provides better performance yet requires more resources compared to vanilla Kubernetes.
 

Room For Improvement

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud requires better search, firewall, stability, legacy support, third-party integrations, UI, deployment, and resource education.
Azure Kubernetes Service requires improved monitoring, integration, affordability, user interface, automation, documentation, and support for enhanced usability.
Red Hat OpenShift needs enhanced documentation and improvements in user support, feature compatibility, security, and cross-cloud management.
If I had to ask for anything to make it easier, it would be signed images that are GPG signed and a public repository where we can get the bits from.
If they can merge Kubernetes Security with other modules related to Kubernetes, that would help us to get more modules in the current subscription.
As organizations move to the cloud, a cloud posture management tool that offers complete cloud visibility becomes crucial for maintaining compliance.
Learning OpenShift requires complex infrastructure, needing vCenter integration, more advanced answers, active directory, and more expensive hardware.
 

Setup Cost

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security offers competitive, customizable pricing, seen as cost-effective, especially against CrowdStrike, despite occasional higher costs.
Azure Kubernetes Service is considered expensive with flexible pricing influenced by usage, configuration, and added features.
Red Hat OpenShift is pricey but offers value through scalability, support, and potential savings with enterprise agreements.
With very little negotiation involved, we just let them know what we could pay and they were willing to meet us at slightly above what we paid with Sophos, which was still very fair for what we were looking at.
The price was very, very important to us, and it came down to the price when we were doing our evaluations WatchGuard and SentinelOne.
Covering our 50,000 endpoints would have nearly bankrupted most security programs, even well-funded ones like ours.
The pricing for Azure Kubernetes Service seems to be around the average, which I would rate as a five out of ten.
The cost of OpenShift is very high, particularly with the OpenShift Plus package, which includes many products and services.
 

Valuable Features

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud excels in usability, real-time detection, automated remediation, seamless integration, and enhances productivity with minimal false positives.
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) provides secure, scalable container orchestration, seamless Azure integration, user-friendly features, and cost-effective resource management.
OpenShift excels in security, scalability, automation, and integration, with powerful tools and features for efficient application management.
The real-time detection and response capabilities of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud impressive because it is a platform that uses artificial intelligence to determine what is normal and what is abnormal and can lock down any virus it may encounter.
We were shown how ransomware can be immediately stopped in real-time. That was huge.
Our previous product took a lot of man hours to manage. Once we got Singularity Cloud Workload Security, it freed up our time to work on other tasks.
The most valuable features of Azure Kubernetes Service are its integration with Kubernetes, offering similar features for a seamless experience.
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
99
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (6th), Cloud and Data Center Security (5th), Container Security (3rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (4th), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (3rd), Compliance Management (3rd)
Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (14th)
Red Hat OpenShift
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
57
Ranking in other categories
PaaS Clouds (3rd), Server Virtualization Software (8th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Container Security
PaaS Clouds
 

Q&A Highlights

MJ
Aug 23, 2023
 

Featured Reviews

Andrew W - PeerSpot reviewer
Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues
Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.
Luis_Navarrete - PeerSpot reviewer
Decreases administrative burdens and costs, has good diagnostic tools, and is easy to deploy
The solution's logs have room for improvement. I believe that consolidating the logs would help to improve the recall of information from them. With so many logs and such a large amount of data, it would be much easier to obtain relevant information if the logs were merged into a single log. I would like to have an easier migration from on-prem to the cloud Azure Kubernetes Service. I can complete the task quickly, but I'm not sure many others can accomplish it at the same time or with the same amount of effort, since it may be a bit challenging, to begin with, if we don't have a full understanding of the concepts. Therefore, it would be beneficial if the service provides a resource to make the integration process simpler. I believe Azure provides a great service, and I'm working with the solution on a daily basis. However, Azure Kubernetes Service can be improved to make it easier to manage. The user interface can be a bit overwhelming, especially for those who are unfamiliar with the concepts. I suggest having a wizard that simplifies integration and creation of a new Kubernetes in the cloud.
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly monitor microservices with streamlined DevOps capabilities
Most benefit from it, however, I work with Kubernetes, and installing Vanilla Kubernetes is easy. That said, it introduces many tools that need to be set up individually. OpenShift comes ready out of the box, with all tools installed and configured. Red Hat certifies and confirms that all the components are compatible with each other. OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes. The integrated DevOps capabilities, such as pipelines and the container registry, are extremely beneficial. Additionally, its capability to monitor microservices and containers with integrated tools like Prometheus is a major advantage. The horizontal pod scaling exceeds the scalability features I found in Kubernetes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Security solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
5%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PingSafe?
The pricing is somewhat high compared to other market tools. This cost can be particularly prohibitive for small busi...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
To enhance the notification system's efficiency, resolved issues should be promptly removed from the portal. Currentl...
What do you like most about Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
The platform's high scalability is one of its biggest advantages.
What needs improvement with Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
No improvements needed as Azure Kubernetes Service follows the Kubernetes standards very well and meets the required ...
What is your primary use case for Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS)?
I am using Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) for enterprise applications. These applications are divided into microservi...
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderfu...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective....
What do you like most about OpenShift?
OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
No data available
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Information Not Available
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Container Security. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.