Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Organizations benefit from Google Cloud by shortening project timelines and utilizing cost-free tools, achieving substantial time and cost savings.
Sentiment score
7.8
Red Hat OpenShift improved productivity, scalability, and ROI with seamless cloud integration, benefiting sectors needing high security like banking.
Moving to OpenShift resulted in increased system stability and reduced downtime, which contributed to operational efficiency.
With OpenShift combined with IBM Cloud App integration, I can spin an integration server in a second as compared to traditional methods, which could take days or weeks.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Google Cloud's support is seen as competent but often criticized for slow response times and separate cost requirements.
Sentiment score
6.8
Customer service varies, with quick attention to urgent issues but mixed feedback on response times for complex problems.
I consider them good partners when it comes to support.
Red Hat's technical support is responsive and effective.
I have been pretty happy in the past with getting support from Red Hat.
We have dealt with many cases with Red Hat support, and while they eventually solve issues, it sometimes takes them a long time to reach a resolution, particularly with complex matters related to IBM Cloud.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Google Cloud's scalability and Kubernetes integration enable effortless expansion, appealing to users despite cost considerations.
Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat OpenShift excels in scalability, efficiently managing large deployments with features like Horizontal Pod Autoscaling for extensive workloads.
Red Hat OpenShift scales excellently, with a rating of ten out of ten.
OpenShift's horizontal pod scaling is more effective and efficient than that used in Kubernetes, making it a superior choice for scalability.
The on-demand provisioning of pods and auto-scaling, whether horizontal or vertical, is the best part.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Google Cloud is praised for reliability, scoring high in stability, but some note rare service-specific issues compared to competitors.
Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat OpenShift is stable and reliable, with improved performance in recent versions, rated highly by users for stability.
I've had my cluster running for over four years.
It provides better performance yet requires more resources compared to vanilla Kubernetes.
It performs well under load, providing the desired output.
 

Room For Improvement

Google Cloud needs improvements in usability, cost, support, integration, security, training, resources, language support, and service expansion.
Red Hat OpenShift users seek improved documentation, configuration simplicity, enhanced security, and better integration, deployment, and interface accessibility.
Providing more hypervisors would be beneficial.
Learning OpenShift requires complex infrastructure, needing vCenter integration, more advanced answers, active directory, and more expensive hardware.
The removal of Grafana and HPA from monitoring caused some issues.
We should aim to include VMware-like capabilities to be competitive, especially considering cost factors.
 

Setup Cost

Google Cloud offers flexible pay-as-you-go pricing, but some users find it pricier than competitors like Azure and AWS.
Red Hat OpenShift pricing is cost-effective with flexible licensing, extensive features, and strong support, though improvements are needed.
As far as I know, it is a little more expensive compared to other cloud options.
The cost of OpenShift is very high, particularly with the OpenShift Plus package, which includes many products and services.
Red Hat can improve on the pricing part by making it more flexible and possibly on the lower side.
The cost is a crucial factor, particularly with licensing.
 

Valuable Features

Google Cloud offers powerful features like user-friendliness, scalability, security, and managed services, appealing to diverse developer and user needs.
Red Hat OpenShift excels in security, scalability, Kubernetes integration, CI/CD support, and multi-cloud flexibility for efficient application management.
If customers use different technologies within their environment, GCP cannot offer a full performance analysis covering all the disclosures.
OpenShift offers an easy-to-use graphical user interface for cluster management, making it more accessible for administrators.
The concept of containers and scaling on demand is a feature I appreciate the most about Red Hat OpenShift.
A valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift is its ability to handle increased loads by automatically adding nodes.
 

Categories and Ranking

Google Cloud
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
74
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (5th)
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Server Virtualization Software (9th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Google Cloud is 7.3%, up from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 11.8%, up from 10.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Monirul Islam Khan - PeerSpot reviewer
Great for big data with off-the-charts scalability for storage and databases
The solution should be more configurable for high-volume databases. The managed service does not allow flexible database configurations that are needed for better filter performance. We have a TPS first-grade, high-volume database using an ERC system. We are moving to Clarity for managed services and need more configurations to support it. The solution could improve its management services for MongoDB. The website's memory only allows one TB.
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly monitor microservices with streamlined DevOps capabilities
Most benefit from it, however, I work with Kubernetes, and installing Vanilla Kubernetes is easy. That said, it introduces many tools that need to be set up individually. OpenShift comes ready out of the box, with all tools installed and configured. Red Hat certifies and confirms that all the components are compatible with each other. OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes. The integrated DevOps capabilities, such as pipelines and the container registry, are extremely beneficial. Additionally, its capability to monitor microservices and containers with integrated tools like Prometheus is a major advantage. The horizontal pod scaling exceeds the scalability features I found in Kubernetes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
52%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
5%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Google Cloud?
Google Cloud is perceived as a cost-effective and user-friendly option, especially compared to AWS. The current affordability and ease of use make it suitable for medium-sized companies. While the ...
What needs improvement with Google Cloud?
In terms of Google services, providing more hypervisors would be beneficial. Currently, in my region, they don't offer many services as they have just started. They have some local instances, yet i...
What is your primary use case for Google Cloud?
My platform offers a monitoring solution for the virtual machines hosted in GCP. GCP is one of the firms that I work with. For customers who use GCP as an infrastructure service, software as a serv...
How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What do you like most about OpenShift?
OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about Google Cloud vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.