Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Amazon AWS is praised for cost-efficiency, scalability, quick deployment, and positive ROI, especially during critical periods like COVID-19.
Sentiment score
7.8
Red Hat OpenShift boosts productivity, scalability, and efficiency, enhancing deployment and reducing costs through containerization and streamlined cloud transitions.
Moving to OpenShift resulted in increased system stability and reduced downtime, which contributed to operational efficiency.
With OpenShift combined with IBM Cloud App integration, I can spin an integration server in a second as compared to traditional methods, which could take days or weeks.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Amazon AWS provides reliable customer service with skilled support staff, enhancing user satisfaction through responsive and knowledgeable assistance.
Sentiment score
6.8
Red Hat OpenShift support varies; praised for premium service and community help, criticized for slow responses and complex documentation.
Amazon AWS has good technical engineers available, making their customer service reliable.
Red Hat's technical support is responsive and effective.
I have been pretty happy in the past with getting support from Red Hat.
We have dealt with many cases with Red Hat support, and while they eventually solve issues, it sometimes takes them a long time to reach a resolution, particularly with complex matters related to IBM Cloud.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon AWS is highly valued for its scalability and flexibility, effectively supporting diverse user needs and business applications.
Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat OpenShift is praised for scalability, dynamic scaling, and seamless integration, though some seek competitive improvements.
Amazon AWS provides strong scalability features, but the scaling process could be made more straightforward.
OpenShift's horizontal pod scaling is more effective and efficient than that used in Kubernetes, making it a superior choice for scalability.
Red Hat OpenShift scales excellently, with a rating of ten out of ten.
OpenShift is highly scalable, allowing us to manage thousands of pods effectively.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Amazon AWS is highly reliable and stable, with minimal downtime, though architecture design impacts performance, making it a preferred choice.
Sentiment score
7.6
Red Hat OpenShift is highly rated for stability and reliability, with improvements in version 4.x enhancing performance for production use.
I've had my cluster running for over four years.
It provides better performance yet requires more resources compared to vanilla Kubernetes.
It performs well under load, providing the desired output.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon AWS needs better cost transparency, user interface, integration, documentation, security, support, and training to enhance user experience.
Red Hat OpenShift requires enhanced documentation, simplified configuration, improved integration, better security, and cost-effective infrastructure solutions.
Amazon AWS could improve its user interface to make it more user-friendly, especially for people who are not highly technical.
Learning OpenShift requires complex infrastructure, needing vCenter integration, more advanced answers, active directory, and more expensive hardware.
The removal of Grafana and HPA from monitoring caused some issues.
We should aim to include VMware-like capabilities to be competitive, especially considering cost factors.
 

Setup Cost

AWS pricing is scalable and competitive but complex, with tools available to manage potential unexpected costs for enterprises.
Red Hat OpenShift pricing is high but offers value and scalability, with costs justified by support and integration benefits.
Currently, Amazon AWS is known to be on the higher price range because popular and in-demand services often come at a premium.
The cost of OpenShift is very high, particularly with the OpenShift Plus package, which includes many products and services.
Red Hat can improve on the pricing part by making it more flexible and possibly on the lower side.
The cost is a crucial factor, particularly with licensing.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon AWS leads in cloud hosting with scalable services, pay-as-you-go model, robust infrastructure, and global reach.
Red Hat OpenShift excels in deployment, automation, security, and integration, offering multi-cloud flexibility and strong customer support.
Their infrastructure is robust, allowing for increased capacity as user volume grows.
OpenShift offers an easy-to-use graphical user interface for cluster management, making it more accessible for administrators.
A valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift is its ability to handle increased loads by automatically adding nodes.
The concept of containers and scaling on demand is a feature I appreciate the most about Red Hat OpenShift.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
255
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (2nd)
Red Hat OpenShift
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Server Virtualization Software (9th), Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 13.2%, down from 17.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift is 12.0%, up from 11.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

Arun Srivastav - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for automatic scaling of resources and provides built-in firewalls and security features, eliminating the need for external security solutions
One thing that's a bit different is that we're still accustomed to speaking to someone directly. AWS doesn't offer that kind of support. It's only through bots. You're speaking to chatbots, and that can sometimes be frustrating because there's no person on the other side. AI is not a substitute for a person. AWS marketplace is very strong, but somehow AWS doesn't promote it much. They have a huge customer base across the globe, and if products were launched in their marketplace, they could sell like hotcakes. They should improve their marketplace and promote the same product across the globe. They can take a cut, but they should promote it. That's something they don't do very much. So, AWS should promote its marketplace software. The company should promote it aggressively. Currently, they keep it very subtle. If you ask for it, they'll help you out. But they don't seem to advertise, "You're building a product on our platform? Why don't you sell it in our marketplace?" Improvement in AI: AWS is a little behind Microsoft Azure in terms of AI. AWS is still getting there, but the kind of examples and help files available in Azure for AI are much better. So AWS still needs to work on its AI functionality.
Mikhael Ibrahim - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly monitor microservices with streamlined DevOps capabilities
Most benefit from it, however, I work with Kubernetes, and installing Vanilla Kubernetes is easy. That said, it introduces many tools that need to be set up individually. OpenShift comes ready out of the box, with all tools installed and configured. Red Hat certifies and confirms that all the components are compatible with each other. OpenShift's superior dashboard is a notable strength, especially when compared to Kubernetes. The integrated DevOps capabilities, such as pipelines and the container registry, are extremely beneficial. Additionally, its capability to monitor microservices and containers with integrated tools like Prometheus is a major advantage. The horizontal pod scaling exceeds the scalability features I found in Kubernetes.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
842,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
28%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
32%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...
Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure
We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...
Which would you recommend - Pivotal Cloud Foundry or OpenShift?
Pivotal Cloud Foundry is a cloud-native application platform to simplify app delivery. It is efficient and effective. The best feature is how easy it is to handle external services such as database...
What do you like most about OpenShift?
OpenShift facilitates DevOps practices and improves CI/CD workflows in terms of stability compared to Jenkins.
What needs improvement with OpenShift?
I had to frequently upgrade my cluster due to OpenShift's rolling updates every six months, which I found to be excessive. Making updates a yearly occurrence could be beneficial. In terms of self-s...
 

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.
UPS, Cathay Pacific, Hilton
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. Red Hat OpenShift and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
842,161 professionals have used our research since 2012.