We compared Microsoft DPM and Veeam Backup & Replication based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Microsoft DPM offers efficient data backup and recovery, seamless integration, customizable schedules, and strong security measures. Veeam Backup & Replication feedback lacks specifics, no mention of features, customer service, or ROI. Overall, Microsoft DPM seems to stand out for its user-friendly interface and security features compared to Veeam Backup & Replication.
Features: Microsoft DPM offers efficient data backup and recovery, seamless integration with Microsoft products, customizable backup schedules, strong security measures, and a user-friendly interface. In contrast, the valuable features of Veeam Backup & Replication were not mentioned.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost of Microsoft DPM is uncertain due to insufficient review data. Similarly, the setup cost of Veeam Backup & Replication cannot be determined as all review answers are blank., There is no available data source to summarize the ROI for Microsoft DPM, while there is also no available data for the ROI of Veeam Backup & Replication.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft DPM lacks specific data to identify room for improvement, while Veeam Backup & Replication has feedback lacking specificity or specific areas for improvement mentioned.
Deployment and customer support: The user feedback for Microsoft DPM does not contain any specific reviews or answers, while for Veeam Backup & Replication, there is no information or quotes available to provide a summary., Based on the available data, there is no information provided about the customer service and support of Microsoft DPM. Similarly, no reviews mention the customer service and support provided by Veeam Backup & Replication.
The summary above is based on 111 interviews we conducted recently with Microsoft DPM and Veeam Backup & Replication users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
"The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require."
"The most valuable feature is the recovery."
"Its capability to give a BMR for all the workstations that I want to connect to."
"The most important feature is that it's easy to use."
"The initial setup is quite straightforward."
"It has an application backup, a file backup, a system backup and a hypervisor."
"The user interface is very good. The reporting and monitoring features are also good."
"I like the core backup feature. I also like the file server backup feature. I find Microsoft DPM interesting because it has fantastic integration with Microsoft products. For example, in Exchange and SharePoint, DPM is excellent when it comes to backing up data. It also does a decent job with open-source products."
"The solution is stable and the performance is good."
"The most valuable feature is the continuous backup."
"The main feature for Veeam is that it's built primarily for virtualization, such as VMware or Hyper-V."
"The most valuable aspects are the latest features in version 12.1, which introduced enhanced security features."
"Veeam's file monitoring capabilities are strong and consistent."
"The restore capabilities are the most valuable features."
"The solution's best features are its ease of use and replication."
"Sandbox feature is like a power tool for troubleshooting."
"It needs portability for other vendors. It is good for backing up Microsoft servers, but it doesn't support third-party solutions such as Oracle Database. It depends on Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy, especially for Hyper-V, which has a lot of problems. They should enhance the Volume Shadow Copy functionality. Its reporting should also be better. Reporting is too weak in DPM."
"There is a very poor online user community in terms of people blogging about their experiences with DPM."
"Compatibility and integration with other products needs improvement."
"Management reporting could be improved."
"The problem lies with the 2019 version, it's the file system they’re using."
"The data tagging feature needs improvement. The solution could be a bit more intuitive in certain aspects."
"You have only a few settings and if you change them for some special configurations, it's very difficult."
"We can't take a snapshot and take it outside, which is a problem."
"I would like to see the replication and a recovery plan of the servers in the cloud. It's very important."
"The price can be a bit expensive."
"The replication process is very slow. It takes too long to replicate a virtual machine."
"Add an archive option to support legal obligations."
"The deduplication feature could be improved by changing to global deduplication."
"The tech support needs improvement."
"Scalability, as well as licensing costs, need to be improved."
"Some of the best practice documentation could be improved."
Microsoft DPM is ranked 28th in Backup and Recovery with 17 reviews while Veeam Backup & Replication is ranked 1st in Backup and Recovery with 329 reviews. Microsoft DPM is rated 7.0, while Veeam Backup & Replication is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Microsoft DPM writes "Good for backing up, but the 2019 version lags". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Veeam Backup & Replication writes "Beneficial pricing model, user friendly interface, and many free features". Microsoft DPM is most compared with Azure Backup, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), Commvault Cloud, Veritas Backup Exec and Veeam Data Platform, whereas Veeam Backup & Replication is most compared with Acronis Cyber Protect, Azure Backup, Rubrik, Zerto and Veeam Data Platform. See our Microsoft DPM vs. Veeam Backup & Replication report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.