Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft DPM Logo

Top 10 Microsoft DPM Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
3.6 out of 5
1,800 followers
Start review

Top Microsoft DPM Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft DPM based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Commvault Cloud, and Rubrik. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft DPM surpasses its competitors by offering seamless data backup, robust recovery solutions, and integration capabilities with other Microsoft products, ensuring efficient protection and management of organizational data with ease and reliability.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft DPM suits those seeking affordable, seamless Microsoft integration. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform appeals to those needing robust, versatile features beyond Microsoft-specific environments. Tech buyers might select Microsoft DPM for cost-effectiveness, while others may prefer Veeam for advanced data recovery options.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
Microsoft DPM involves a lower initial setup cost, whereas Veeam Data Platform's setup cost is higher but offers a wider range of advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM involves a lower initial setup cost, whereas Veeam Data Platform's setup cost is higher but offers a wider range of advanced features.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Commvault Cloud
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Commvault Cloud
4.3 out of 5
Commvault Cloud offers comprehensive integration and deduplication across storage options, providing cost savings and flexibility in cloud deployments. In comparison, Microsoft DPM excels within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering budget-friendly solutions and robust on-premise support with fixed costs for enterprises.
Download Commvault Cloud vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Commvault Cloud has a lower initial setup cost, while Microsoft DPM incurs higher upfront expenses for deployment and configuration.
View comparison
Pricing
Commvault Cloud has a lower initial setup cost, while Microsoft DPM incurs higher upfront expenses for deployment and configuration.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Rubrik
4.6 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Rubrik
4.6 out of 5
Microsoft DPM excels in Microsoft integration, beneficial for Microsoft-centric businesses. In comparison, Rubrik stands out with advanced recovery features and cloud adaptability. Microsoft DPM is cost-effective for its setup costs, while Rubrik’s higher investment offers long-term ROI through agile data management.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Rubrik Report
Microsoft DPM has a lower setup cost compared to Rubrik, which may affect initial budget considerations. Rubrik offers a more comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher expense, impacting long-term investment decisions differently.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM has a lower setup cost compared to Rubrik, which may affect initial budget considerations. Rubrik offers a more comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher expense, impacting long-term investment decisions differently.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Acronis Cyber Protect
4.1 out of 5
Acronis Cyber Protect offers flexible backup options, cloud integration, and recovery features suitable for diverse environments. In comparison, Microsoft DPM integrates seamlessly with Microsoft's ecosystem, providing compatibility with Microsoft products, ideal for users heavily reliant on Microsoft infrastructure.
Download Acronis Cyber Protect vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Acronis Cyber Protect offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft DPM incurs higher setup fees, highlighting a cost difference favoring Acronis for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Acronis Cyber Protect offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Microsoft DPM incurs higher setup fees, highlighting a cost difference favoring Acronis for budget-conscious users.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Veritas NetBackup
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Veritas NetBackup
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft DPM offers competitive pricing and seamless integration within Microsoft environments. In comparison, Veritas NetBackup provides extensive platform support and robust deduplication. A tech buyer might prefer DPM for cost savings, while NetBackup could appeal for its comprehensive features and scalability.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Veritas NetBackup Report
Microsoft DPM requires a relatively low setup cost, while Veritas NetBackup tends to have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM requires a relatively low setup cost, while Veritas NetBackup tends to have higher initial expenses.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft DPM provides integration with Microsoft ecosystems and is cost-effective with robust support. In comparison, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager delivers extensive features, multi-cloud support, and scalability, making it suitable for diverse environments. Both cater to different organizational needs based on integration and feature depth.
Download Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Microsoft DPM typically involves more affordable initial setup costs, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager may require a higher upfront investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM typically involves more affordable initial setup costs, while Dell PowerProtect Data Manager may require a higher upfront investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Cohesity DataProtect
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft DPM draws attention with competitive pricing and seamless integration within Microsoft ecosystems. In comparison, Cohesity DataProtect stands out for its extensive platform coverage and advanced features, appealing to those seeking a comprehensive and scalable data management solution.
Download Cohesity DataProtect vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Microsoft DPM presents a lower initial setup cost, whereas Cohesity DataProtect requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a key difference in initial financial commitment.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM presents a lower initial setup cost, whereas Cohesity DataProtect requires a higher upfront investment, highlighting a key difference in initial financial commitment.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Dell Avamar
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Dell Avamar
3.8 out of 5
Dell Avamar offers robust client-side deduplication and VMware integration, suitable for remote backups. In comparison, Microsoft DPM emphasizes data recovery within Microsoft's ecosystem. Avamar's advanced features justify its high cost, while DPM provides cost-effective integration for Microsoft users.
Download Dell Avamar vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Dell Avamar's setup cost is relatively high, while Microsoft DPM offers a more affordable initial setup, making DPM a cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
Dell Avamar's setup cost is relatively high, while Microsoft DPM offers a more affordable initial setup, making DPM a cost-effective option.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Dell NetWorker
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Dell NetWorker
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft DPM offers attractive pricing and seamless integration with Microsoft environments. In comparison, Dell NetWorker, although more complex to deploy, provides extensive features and supports diverse platforms, which may justify its cost for organizations with varied IT needs.
Download Dell NetWorker vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Microsoft DPM's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its comprehensive backup features. In contrast, Dell NetWorker offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness over extensive capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM's setup cost is relatively higher, reflecting its comprehensive backup features. In contrast, Dell NetWorker offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness over extensive capabilities.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Veritas Backup Exec
3.9 out of 5
Veritas Backup Exec excels with diverse platform integration and robust backup features. In comparison, Microsoft DPM focuses on seamless Microsoft environment integration, appealing to users invested in Microsoft products. Tech buyers may choose Backup Exec for versatility or DPM for Microsoft alignment.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Veritas Backup Exec Report
Veritas Backup Exec typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft DPM, which tends to offer a more budget-friendly entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Veritas Backup Exec typically involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft DPM, which tends to offer a more budget-friendly entry point.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
4.7 out of 5

Microsoft DPM offers cost-effective solutions with seamless Windows integration, appealing to businesses focused on enterprise-level scalability. In comparison, NAKIVO Backup & Replication attracts buyers with extensive VM backup capabilities and fast recovery options, providing flexibility and enhanced long-term ROI despite higher initial costs.

Download Microsoft DPM vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report
Microsoft DPM's setup cost is reportedly higher, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a more budget-friendly setup, creating a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM's setup cost is reportedly higher, while NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers a more budget-friendly setup, creating a significant difference in initial investment requirements between the two solutions.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
N-able Cove Data Protection
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft DPM integrates seamlessly with Windows environments, appealing to enterprises heavily utilizing Microsoft products. In comparison, N-able Cove Data Protection's cloud-native architecture and advanced backup tools attract businesses seeking flexibility in diverse IT environments, making it ideal for cloud adaptability and scalable operations.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. N-able Cove Data Protection Report
Microsoft DPM has a straightforward setup cost structure, while N-able Cove Data Protection may involve additional initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM has a straightforward setup cost structure, while N-able Cove Data Protection may involve additional initial expenses.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Arcserve UDP
3.8 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Arcserve UDP
3.8 out of 5
Arcserve UDP provides advanced deduplication, replication, and cross-platform support, ideal for hybrid environments. In comparison, Microsoft DPM excels in integration with Microsoft solutions, offering superior data recovery for enterprises within the Microsoft ecosystem. Each offers unique advantages for different business needs.
Download Arcserve UDP vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Arcserve UDP has higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft DPM is more budget-friendly upfront. Arcserve UDP offers a more comprehensive feature set, contrasting Microsoft's more straightforward approach catering to basic needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Arcserve UDP has higher initial setup costs, while Microsoft DPM is more budget-friendly upfront. Arcserve UDP offers a more comprehensive feature set, contrasting Microsoft's more straightforward approach catering to basic needs.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Synology DSM
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Synology DSM
4.5 out of 5
Microsoft DPM offers robust integration with Windows environments, appealing to enterprises heavily relying on Microsoft infrastructure. In comparison, Synology DSM, with its versatile NAS features and multi-platform support, attracts businesses seeking flexible, feature-rich storage solutions with simpler deployment processes.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Synology DSM Report
Microsoft DPM has a higher setup cost, offering robust features for enterprise environments, while Synology DSM provides a more affordable setup with straightforward installation, making it suitable for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM has a higher setup cost, offering robust features for enterprise environments, while Synology DSM provides a more affordable setup with straightforward installation, making it suitable for smaller businesses.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Oracle Data Guard
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft DPM Logo
Oracle Data Guard
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft DPM appeals to tech buyers with cost-effective solutions and seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration. In comparison, Oracle Data Guard attracts those seeking advanced data recovery and consistency for Oracle databases, despite higher setup costs. Microsoft DPM offers affordability, while Oracle Data Guard ensures top-tier data protection.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Oracle Data Guard Report
Microsoft DPM offers a more straightforward setup costing less initially, while Oracle Data Guard requires higher upfront investment but provides extensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM offers a more straightforward setup costing less initially, while Oracle Data Guard requires higher upfront investment but provides extensive features.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup
4.3 out of 5
Microsoft DPM integrates well within Microsoft environments for cost efficiency. In comparison, Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup excels in VM management and replication ease. Microsoft DPM offers budget-friendly pricing, while Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup enhances ROI with advanced features and effective VM backup management.
Download Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup vs. Microsoft DPM Report
Microsoft DPM has a higher initial setup cost, while Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM has a higher initial setup cost, while Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Microsoft DPM Logo
Microsoft DPM Logo
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
3.7 out of 5
Microsoft DPM benefits organizations seeking deep integration within Windows ecosystems due to its straightforward deployment and pricing. In comparison, Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup attracts buyers needing scalability and superior data management, despite its higher initial cost and learning curve.
Download Microsoft DPM vs. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Report
Microsoft DPM involves a moderate setup cost with complexity in initial configuration, while Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup presents a higher setup cost yet offers simpler deployment. Users should consider these distinctions when evaluating their backup solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft DPM involves a moderate setup cost with complexity in initial configuration, while Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup presents a higher setup cost yet offers simpler deployment. Users should consider these distinctions when evaluating their backup solutions.

Related categories

Backup and Recovery
Cloud Backup
Virtualization Management Tools