Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft DPM Logo

Microsoft DPM pros and cons

Vendor: Microsoft
3.5 out of 5
1,805 followers
Post review

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Microsoft DPM provides comprehensive backup capabilities including application, file, system, and hypervisor backups.
It offers efficient recovery options and the ability to perform Bare Metal Recovery (BMR) for connected workstations.
Initial setup of Microsoft DPM is straightforward, facilitating easy implementation.
Features automated procedures that are effective in capturing required information to ensure comprehensive data management.
Microsoft DPM is optimized for Microsoft environments, offering excellent integration and support for servers like Exchange and SharePoint.

CONS

Data tagging feature needs improvement.
Compatibility and integration with other products needs improvement.
Insufficient portability for non-Microsoft vendors.
Volume Shadow Copy functionality requires enhancement.
Inadequate support for data integration and replication akin to Veeam.
 

Microsoft DPM Pros review quotes

reviewer1373331 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 2, 2020
The solution backs up Microsoft workloads as well as anything on the market.
reviewer1731429 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2021
The most important feature is that it's easy to use.
SS
Feb 16, 2023
I like the core backup feature. I also like the file server backup feature. I find Microsoft DPM interesting because it has fantastic integration with Microsoft products. For example, in Exchange and SharePoint, DPM is excellent when it comes to backing up data. It also does a decent job with open-source products.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft DPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RK
Sep 25, 2020
The initial setup is quite straightforward.
WM
Oct 19, 2020
The automated procedure is quite good for us, as it is able to capture all of the information that we require.
RifkanHasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 30, 2019
The most valuable feature is the recovery.
reviewer2261112 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2023
This solution helps us to manage all of the operations across servers and different workstations.
MK
Sep 25, 2024
The most valuable feature is the total integration of the System Center solution.
RK
Jan 7, 2020
Its capability to give a BMR for all the workstations that I want to connect to.
WM
Feb 13, 2023
I could back up all the stuff we had, even the VMs we have for Hyper V.
 

Microsoft DPM Cons review quotes

reviewer1373331 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 2, 2020
There is a very poor online user community in terms of people blogging about their experiences with DPM.
reviewer1731429 - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 20, 2021
You have only a few settings and if you change them for some special configurations, it's very difficult.
SS
Feb 16, 2023
It would be better if it integrated seamlessly with open source and competitor products. In the next release, I would like to see some data governance frameworks. It should have support features for data integration and data replication like Veeam. Right now, we are also using Veeam for certain scenarios.
Learn what your peers think about Microsoft DPM. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RK
Sep 25, 2020
The user interface can be improved quite a bit.
WM
Oct 19, 2020
Management reporting could be improved.
RifkanHasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 30, 2019
We can't take a snapshot and take it outside, which is a problem.
reviewer2261112 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 22, 2023
To evaluate the solution's abilities and its performance under demanding conditions, it is recommended to carry out a stress test.
MK
Sep 25, 2024
It can back up, yet it lacks features compared to Veeam.
RK
Jan 7, 2020
The user friendliness could be improved.
WM
Feb 13, 2023
The problem lies with the 2019 version, it's the file system they’re using.