Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs Zscaler DLP comparison

"The product is flexible."

"The product provides visibility to manage sensitive data and control access."

"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."

"On DLP terms, Zscaler Cloud DLP ensures that data doesn't go outside of the organization. So on the network level, Zscaler does a pretty good job."

"The product’s most valuable features are inbound and outbound scanning and API control."

"The UI is easy to use."

"The in-line DLP feature is one of the most vital features"

"It's one of the easier products on the market as far as set-ups and deployments. Even across their whole product suite, they've made it pretty simple."

"The policies are very easy to implement."

"The solution is the best for storage."

"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten. The pricing is moderate."

"The product should be compatible with multiple file formats."

"There are some performance issues with the solution once the module addition begins"

"There could be additional ways to define proximity. Additionally, they should provide some exclusion options for specific policies and an ability to control the DLP engine."

"The product must allow users to check logs for an entire year in the local console."

"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."

"Zscaler Cloud DLP needs to improve its compatibility with other security tools."

"The only issue with Zscaler Cloud DLP is that it only gives you DLP protection from web traffic, which is flowing out, while a full-blown DLP solution such as Forcepoint or Symantec gives you DLP coverage for multiple channels. Zscaler Cloud DLP doesn't give you coverage for email, fax, and USB channels, and this is the only challenge or room for improvement in the solution. It's just an extension on top of what you're buying on the proxy, so it's just an added layer, and it doesn't cover DLP on a very broad level. I'm unsure if Zcaler is in the business of competing with a full-blown DLP solution, and if there's a plan to expand the features of Zscaler Cloud DLP beyond the web channel because you'll have to deploy a full-blown agent for it. I'm unsure if this is on the cards because the solution is just an added layer that you get with your proxy. I've asked the Zcaler team whether there's a plan to go full DLP in the future, but I didn't get a positive response. There isn't any feature I'd like added to Zscaler Cloud DLP currently, because anything you could think of that should be in cloud or SaaS solutions is already there, except for machine learning, as it's the only functionality that seems to be lacking in the solution. Machine learning is an additional policy available in other DLP solutions in the market, but my team didn't find it in Zscaler Cloud DLP."

"In the next release, I would like to see RE2 Regex supported."

"There aren't really any missing features that I have witnessed."

"The pricing is moderate."

"It's expensive currently. But when purchasing for a large number of users, there's room to negotiate. It's really up to the procurement team."

"The product is a bit expensive."

"It is an auto-renewal subscription service."

"It's an affordable solution"

"Zscaler DLP solution is expensive, with a fixed pricing structure that is billed annually and monthly. There are no additional costs for licenses."

"The licensing model for Zscaler Cloud DLP allows you to only buy what you need. You don't need to buy it as a whole, so it's good."

"The product has reasonable pricing."

"The product is a little more expensive than other tools."