Top 10 Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

2 reviews
66% willing to recommend

Top Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, Varonis Platform, and Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) surpasses its competitors by offering advanced cloud-native data protection, real-time policy enforcement, and seamless integration with cloud services to ensure comprehensive data security and compliance across diverse applications and environments.

Netskope Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Netskope, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler excels with seamless integration and secure application access, attracting those focused on network security. In comparison, Netskope's thorough data inspection and risk analysis offer robust protection for data-centric needs, appealing to organizations prioritizing comprehensive data security. Each solution caters to distinct security requirements.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform has a lower initial setup cost, while Netskope Data Loss Prevention offers more flexible pricing options for deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform has a lower initial setup cost, while Netskope Data Loss Prevention offers more flexible pricing options for deployment.

Varonis Platform

4.1 out of 5

Varonis Platform

4.1 out of 5

Netskope DLP offers better pricing and support, prioritizing real-time data inspection in cloud environments. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in data classification and threat detection, with higher costs justified by extensive features and seamless enterprise deployment.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Varonis Platform Report

Pricing

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers straightforward setup costs, while Varonis Platform involves a more complex initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in setup simplicity and cost-effectiveness between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

3.9 out of 5

Microsoft Purview DLP integrates tightly with Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to those seeking seamless compliance and protection within this environment. In comparison, Netskope DLP's cloud-centric features attract buyers needing flexible, advanced data protection across diverse cloud platforms for comprehensive security strategies.

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention incurs a substantially higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention, making Netskope a more cost-effective option at the initial stage.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention incurs a substantially higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention, making Netskope a more cost-effective option at the initial stage.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Forcepoint DLP appeals with competitive pricing and robust support, ideal for complex environments needing granular policy controls. In comparison, Netskope DLP's cloud-native architecture and advanced analytics justify its higher price, benefiting those prioritizing extensive application coverage and seamless cloud integration.

Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention requires a substantial setup investment, whereas Netskope Data Loss Prevention is more cost-effective in initial setup, highlighting a key difference in upfront costs between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Symantec DLP excels in strong endpoint integration ideal for on-premise deployments. In comparison, Netskope DLP's cloud-centric design offers advanced analytics. Symantec requires more setup time, while Netskope's scalable solutions simplify deployment. Symantec has higher initial costs; Netskope provides a flexible pricing model.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Symantec Data Loss Prevention typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key financial difference for organizations evaluating their data protection solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Digital Guardian

3.7 out of 5

Digital Guardian

3.7 out of 5

Digital Guardian excels in comprehensive endpoint protection with on-premise security ideal for traditional environments. In comparison, Netskope DLP offers cloud-native security with strong control over cloud data, favoring organizations seeking agility in cloud deployments and substantial ROI despite higher initial investment.

Download Digital Guardian vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Digital Guardian has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Digital Guardian has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements.

Code42 Incydr

4.5 out of 5

Code42 Incydr

4.5 out of 5

Code42 Incydr is highlighted for cost-effectiveness and strong risk detection. In comparison, Netskope DLP's comprehensive features cater to those needing advanced data protection. Code42 Incydr's simplicity and support appeal to budget-conscious buyers, while Netskope DLP addresses long-term security goals with advanced capabilities.

Download Code42 Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Code42 Incydr has a straightforward setup cost, while Netskope DLP may involve more complexity, highlighting a key difference for organizations considering deployment options.

View comparison

Pricing

Code42 Incydr has a straightforward setup cost, while Netskope DLP may involve more complexity, highlighting a key difference for organizations considering deployment options.

Safetica ONE

3.6 out of 5

Safetica ONE

3.6 out of 5

Netskope DLP integrates comprehensive threat intelligence, excelling in real-time cloud data protection. In comparison, Safetica ONE provides detailed endpoint data protection and internal audits, offering a straightforward setup and enhanced regulatory compliance, appealing to those prioritizing on-premise control and budget-friendly solutions.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Safetica ONE Report

Pricing

Netskope DLP has a higher setup cost compared to Safetica ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope DLP has a higher setup cost compared to Safetica ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

4.2 out of 5

Netwrix Endpoint Protector

4.2 out of 5

Netwrix Endpoint Protector offers strong device control and policy management, suitable for cost-effective setups. In comparison, Netskope DLP excels in cloud-native capabilities and AI-driven data classification, appealing to enterprises seeking extensive scalability despite a higher initial investment.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Netwrix Endpoint Protector Report

Pricing

Netwrix Endpoint Protector has a lower setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), which typically involves a more complex and costly installation process. This difference highlights the varying initial investment required for each solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix DLP

3.9 out of 5

Trellix DLP

3.9 out of 5

Netskope DLP emphasizes cost-effective cloud capabilities with granular controls and real-time protection, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Trellix DLP's extensive features and integration options make it a strong choice for organizations requiring deep analytics and long-term functionality.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Trellix DLP Report

Pricing

Netskope DLP offers streamlined setup with lower initial costs, while Trellix DLP involves a higher setup investment but provides extensive integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope DLP offers streamlined setup with lower initial costs, while Trellix DLP involves a higher setup investment but provides extensive integration capabilities.

Show 4 more products

Related categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Application Control