Top 10 Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

2 reviews
66% willing to recommend

Top Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, and Varonis Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) surpasses its competitors by offering advanced cloud-native data protection, real-time policy enforcement, and seamless integration with cloud services to ensure comprehensive data security and compliance across diverse applications and environments.

Netskope Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Netskope, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

4.2 out of 5

Zscaler offers excellent data inspection and secure web gateway capabilities with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Netskope excels in advanced data protection and comprehensive cloud security, justifying its higher cost with robust ROI and efficient large data volume handling.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report

Pricing

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform often incurs higher setup costs, while Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) tends to offer a more cost-effective implementation, emphasizing the disparity in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft Purview DLP integrates tightly with Microsoft ecosystems, appealing to those seeking seamless compliance and protection within this environment. In comparison, Netskope DLP's cloud-centric features attract buyers needing flexible, advanced data protection across diverse cloud platforms for comprehensive security strategies.

Download Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention incurs a substantially higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention, making Netskope a more cost-effective option at the initial stage.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention incurs a substantially higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention, making Netskope a more cost-effective option at the initial stage.

Varonis Platform

4.1 out of 5

Varonis Platform

4.1 out of 5

Netskope DLP offers seamless integration with cloud services and efficient customer support, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Varonis Platform provides superior data analytics and detailed data governance, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing in-depth insights despite its higher investment requirement.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Varonis Platform Report

Pricing

Netskope DLP offers competitive setup costs with streamlined implementation, while Varonis Platform has higher initial setup expenses due to its comprehensive data protection features.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope DLP offers competitive setup costs with streamlined implementation, while Varonis Platform has higher initial setup expenses due to its comprehensive data protection features.

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Forcepoint DLP appeals with competitive pricing and robust support, ideal for complex environments needing granular policy controls. In comparison, Netskope DLP's cloud-native architecture and advanced analytics justify its higher price, benefiting those prioritizing extensive application coverage and seamless cloud integration.

Download Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention requires a substantial setup investment, whereas Netskope Data Loss Prevention is more cost-effective in initial setup, highlighting a key difference in upfront costs between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Symantec Data Loss Prevention

4.0 out of 5

Symantec DLP excels in strong endpoint integration ideal for on-premise deployments. In comparison, Netskope DLP's cloud-centric design offers advanced analytics. Symantec requires more setup time, while Netskope's scalable solutions simplify deployment. Symantec has higher initial costs; Netskope provides a flexible pricing model.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Symantec Data Loss Prevention Report

Pricing

Symantec Data Loss Prevention typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key financial difference for organizations evaluating their data protection solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Digital Guardian

3.7 out of 5

Digital Guardian

3.7 out of 5

Digital Guardian excels in comprehensive endpoint protection with on-premise security ideal for traditional environments. In comparison, Netskope DLP offers cloud-native security with strong control over cloud data, favoring organizations seeking agility in cloud deployments and substantial ROI despite higher initial investment.

Download Digital Guardian vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Digital Guardian has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements.

View comparison

Pricing

Digital Guardian has a higher setup cost compared to Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP), highlighting a notable difference in initial investment requirements.

Code42 Incydr

4.5 out of 5

Code42 Incydr

4.5 out of 5

Code42 Incydr is highlighted for cost-effectiveness and strong risk detection. In comparison, Netskope DLP's comprehensive features cater to those needing advanced data protection. Code42 Incydr's simplicity and support appeal to budget-conscious buyers, while Netskope DLP addresses long-term security goals with advanced capabilities.

Download Code42 Incydr vs. Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Report

Pricing

Code42 Incydr has a straightforward setup cost, while Netskope DLP may involve more complexity, highlighting a key difference for organizations considering deployment options.

View comparison

Pricing

Code42 Incydr has a straightforward setup cost, while Netskope DLP may involve more complexity, highlighting a key difference for organizations considering deployment options.

Safetica ONE

3.6 out of 5

Safetica ONE

3.6 out of 5

Netskope DLP integrates comprehensive threat intelligence, excelling in real-time cloud data protection. In comparison, Safetica ONE provides detailed endpoint data protection and internal audits, offering a straightforward setup and enhanced regulatory compliance, appealing to those prioritizing on-premise control and budget-friendly solutions.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Safetica ONE Report

Pricing

Netskope DLP has a higher setup cost compared to Safetica ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope DLP has a higher setup cost compared to Safetica ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly option.

Trellix DLP

4.1 out of 5

Trellix DLP

4.1 out of 5

Netskope DLP emphasizes cost-effective cloud capabilities with granular controls and real-time protection, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Trellix DLP's extensive features and integration options make it a strong choice for organizations requiring deep analytics and long-term functionality.

Download Netskope Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vs. Trellix DLP Report

Pricing

Netskope DLP offers streamlined setup with lower initial costs, while Trellix DLP involves a higher setup investment but provides extensive integration capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Netskope DLP offers streamlined setup with lower initial costs, while Trellix DLP involves a higher setup investment but provides extensive integration capabilities.

Cyberhaven

1 out of 5

Cyberhaven

1 out of 5

Cyberhaven offers robust data protection and threat detection features ideal for enterprise security. Its use of real-time monitoring enhances security posture. Users appreciate the intuitive integration with existing systems. However, some suggest improvements in reporting capabilities to better track incidents.

View comparison

Show 1 more products

Related categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Application Control