ShiftLeft vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) comparison

ShiftLeft and Sonar are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. ShiftLeft is ranked #25 with an average rating of 10.0, while Sonar is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. ShiftLeft holds a 0.1% mindshare in AS, compared to Sonar’s 26.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of ShiftLeft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Sonar users who would recommend it.

ShiftLeft

Read 1 ShiftLeft review

256 Views
183 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Read 113 SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) reviews

43,481 Views
35,347 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

ShiftLeft

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 30, 2024

SonarQube Server and ShiftLeft are competitors in the code quality and security domain. While both have strong analysis capabilities, ShiftLeft's advanced security features give it an edge.

Features: SonarQube Server offers comprehensive code quality analysis, identifies code vulnerabilities, and addresses technical debt. It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and supports multiple languages. ShiftLeft emphasizes security with detailed insights and real-time analysis, essential for detecting and addressing vulnerabilities during development. This security focus is attractive to those prioritizing security over general code quality.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SonarQube Server offers flexible deployment options, whether on-premise or cloud-based, backed by extensive community support. ShiftLeft provides cloud deployment with easy workflow integration and is noted for more responsive customer service, which is crucial for organizations needing prompt support.

Pricing and ROI: SonarQube Server usually features lower setup costs and offers substantial ROI with its community edition and scalable commercial plans. ShiftLeft, though premium-priced, justifies its cost with a high ROI thanks to powerful security features that potentially reduce long-term security incident expenses. Companies focused on advanced security may find the investment in ShiftLeft worthwhile compared to SonarQube.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 814,528 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

ShiftLeft

Ranking in Application Security Tools

25th

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

18th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (10th)

SonarQube Server (formerly ...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

1st

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

1st

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

113

Ranking in other categories

Software Development Analytics (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ShiftLeft is 0.1%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) is 26.7%, down from 27.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Shivendra S.

Senior Director of Engineering - Information Security at Apna

Jun 27, 2023

Effectively in identify and fix bugs early in the development lifecycle

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness. Previously, security professionals had to spend a lot of time and effort running around, asking people to fix issues in their products, architectures, code, and even networks. With ShiftLeft, everything becomes robust and secure from within. Instead of relying on external measures like Web Application Firewalls (WAF) that are applied from the outside in, ShiftLeft takes a proactive approach. It helps prevent issues from arising in the first place, making it much easier for both security teams and developers. It's also cost-effective because you don't have to constantly go back, make changes to the code, and then push it again. Writing secure code from the start ensures that there are no vulnerabilities when it goes live. So, I would say the main features of ShiftLeft are its cost-effectiveness and ease of adaptability or use.

Read full review

Wang Dayong

Senior Software Engineering Manager at Hill

May 10, 2023

Easy to integrate and has a plug-in that supports both C and C++ languages

We use the product to review our software codes. We have integrated the product to review our new delivery code When we deliver a code, the solution scans the code and reports whether the code has bugs or any other vulnerability issues. Thus the solution helps us identify issues and improve the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness."

"Engineers have also learned from the results and have improved themselves as engineers. This will help them with their careers."

"It is an easy tool that you can deploy and configure. After that you can measure the history of your obligation and integrate it with other tools like GitLab or GitHub or Azure DevOps to do quality code analysis."

"The solution offers a very good community edition."

"The solution's user interface is very user-friendly."

"The solution can verify vulnerabilities, code smells, and hotspots. It makes the software more secure and it helps make a junior or novice developer sharper."

"This solution has the capability to analyze source code in almost all the languages in the market."

"It's a great product. If you are in a hurry and just want to focus on the functional requirements of any kind of project, SonarQube is highly helpful. It enables the developers to code securely. SonarQube has a Community edition, which is open source and free. There are also three proprietary or paid versions: Enterprise edition, Data Center edition, and Developer edition."

"We have the software metrics that SonarQube gives us, which is something we did not have before. This helps us work towards aiming coding standards to empower us to move in the direction of better code quality. SonarQube provides targets and metrics for that."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pros

Cons

"Having support from senior management is crucial in making it mandatory for teams to collaborate with the security team throughout the development process."

"I would like to see SonarQube implement a good amount of improvements to the product's security features. Another aspect of SonarQube that could be improved is the search functionality."

"The product provides false reports sometimes."

"There are limitations to the free version that limit development options as far as languages."

"There are sometimes security breaches in our code, which aren't be caught by SonarQube. In the security area, SonarCube has to improve. It needs to better compete with other products."

"Having performance regression would be a helpful add on or ability to be able to do during the scan."

"The solution could improve by providing more advanced technologies."

"SonarQube is not development-centric like Snyk."

"There is need for support for the additional languages and ease of use in adding new rules for detecting issues."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The solution has a free version and a license version. The license is priced reasonably, the cost of hiring one programmer is more expensive than the solution."

"The solution is cheaper than other products."

"The development license cost is reasonable, and we've had no concerns about SonarQube when it comes to cost."

"This is open source."

"We are using the free, unlicensed version."

"We use the free version; there are no hidden costs or licensing required."

"The free version of SonarQube does everything that we need it to."

"We use the tool's community edition."

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Retailer

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

12%

Legal Firm

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ShiftLeft?

When it comes to ShiftLeft, the most valuable feature is definitely its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ShiftLeft?

When it comes to areas of improvement for ShiftLeft, I believe it could benefit from greater support from senior management. It's important to have their involvement when it comes to architectural ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ShiftLeft?

I would highly recommend ShiftLeft. It greatly simplifies the job for both security professionals and developers. By identifying and fixing bugs earlier in the development lifecycle, it significant...

See all answers

Is SonarQube the best tool for static analysis?

I am not very familiar with SonarQube and their solutions, so I can not answer. But if you are asking me about which tools that are the best for for Static Code Analysis, I suggest you have a look...

See all answers

Which gives you more for your money - SonarQube or Veracode?

SonarQube is easy to deploy and configure, and also integrates well with other tools to do quality code analysis. SonarQube has a great community edition, which is open-source and free. Easy to use...

See all answers

How would you decide between Coverity and Sonarqube?

We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing rem...

See all answers

Comparisons

Black Duck vs ShiftLeft

Compared 56% of the time

More ShiftLeft Competitors

Checkmarx One vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 17% of the time

Coverity vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

SonarQube Cloud (formerly SonarCloud) vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 12% of the time

GitHub Advanced Security vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

Compared 9% of the time

More SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download ShiftLeft product report

Buyer's Guide

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube)

October 2024

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) report

Download SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sonar

Learn More

ShiftLeft

Sonar

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

ShiftLeft

Sonar

Overview

Shipping secure code is painful and time-consuming – slowing down development teams and AppSec teams alike. ShiftLeft is on a mission to make vulnerabilities history. Our revolutionary Code Property Graph (CPG) enables us to seamlessly insert 10x faster code analysis, prioritized OSS vulnerability findings and real-time security education in one single SaaS platform integrated directly into modern development workflows. Combining our OWASP-benchmark dominating NG-SAST, Intelligent SCA, instant secrets detection, and contextual security education, ShiftLeft CORE code security platform turns every developer into an AppSec expert.

SonarQube Server enhances code quality and security via static code analysis. It detects vulnerabilities, improves standards, and reduces technical debt, integrating into CI/CD pipelines.

SonarQube Server is a comprehensive tool for enhancing code quality and security. It offers static code analysis to identify vulnerabilities, improve coding standards, and reduce technical debt. By integrating into CI/CD pipelines, it provides automated checks for adherence to best practices. Organizations use it for code inspection, security testing, and compliance, ensuring development environments with better maintainability and fewer issues.

What are the key features of SonarQube Server?

Support for 20+ languages: Extensive programming language support suitable for diverse coding environments.
Custom coding rules: Allows for tailored rule sets to match specific coding standards.
Flexible quality gates: Define criteria for code acceptance at various intervals.
CI/CD integration: Seamless integration with Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment tools.
Rich interface: User-friendly dashboard with detailed visual insights.

What benefits should users expect from SonarQube Server?

Improved code quality: Enhanced analysis contributes to fewer bugs and improved coding practices.
Security enhancements: Identifies and mitigates security vulnerabilities pre-emptively.
Maintainability: Reduces technical debt, yielding long-term development efficiency.
Customizable: Flexibility in configuration aligns with specific project needs.

Many industries implement SonarQube Server to uphold coding standards, maintain security protocols, and streamline their software development lifecycle. In sectors like finance and healthcare, adhering to regulations and ensuring reliable software is critical, making SonarQube Server invaluable. It is often integrated into CI/CD pipelines, ensuring that code changes meet set standards before deployment. This approach enhances productivity and maintains compliance with industry-specific requirements.

Buyer's Guide

Application Security Tools

October 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

814,528 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.