Elastic Search Reviews

We use it for locating and retrieving documents, particularly in scenarios where the data lacks a predefined structure. These documents may encompass various types of information, such as logs or other records.

It is highly valuable because of its simplicity in maintenance, where most tasks are handled for you, and it offers a plethora of built-in features.

Currently, their focus seems to be on expanding integrations and introducing more external tools, somewhat diverging from enhancing the core product. While integrating with tools like agents for ingesting data from sources like firewalls is valuable, I believe prioritizing improvements to the core product would be more beneficial. For instance, the development of a multi-step query engine could significantly enhance user experience. The ability to execute queries, receive results, and then perform subsequent queries based on those results is a fundamental feature that, while achievable through code, seems to be lacking as a built-in capability. While they possess a robust infrastructure, the current upgrade process isn't seamless and can result in downtime. As a customer, this can be frustrating, especially when there are methods like replicating to a new instance, performing the upgrade, and then transitioning back, which could potentially minimize downtime. This is crucial in a cloud service where ensuring availability is paramount, considering the significant investment in such services.

I have been working with it for two years.

It offers good stability capabilities.

It is a scalable tool, but it's not impressive. The challenge arises when scaling out becomes prohibitively expensive. Instead of offering end-users the flexibility to specify the number of instances, there's a tendency to provide preconfigured packages. This approach may not be ideal, particularly for those seeking smaller scale-ups.

Their documentation is commendable as it provides a clear understanding of their offerings. Also, the accessibility to their support further enhances user-friendliness, making it a straightforward and user-friendly experience. While it may be slow, their competence in what they do is evident. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The initial setup was straightforward.

Setting up the system initially is quite straightforward, but when it comes to upgrades, the process becomes more challenging. It was an in-house deployment. The primary focus is on designing the solution, considering factors like the importance of replication, cluster size, speed, and disk space. I appreciate their approach of guiding you through these considerations, making it easier to grasp the bigger picture. This initial design phase is a complex but crucial step. Once that's sorted, the subsequent steps are relatively straightforward—just a few clicks to establish the baseline. If you're working on a standard deployment, it's a hassle-free process.

The pricing structure depends on the scalability steps. It begins as quite affordable and maintains affordability for a while. However, there's a turning point where it transitions from being reasonably priced to becoming notably expensive.

We've explored a few alternatives, but I believe Elasticsearch, particularly with Elastic and Elastic Cloud, stands out as the current industry standard. Opting for a widely used platform is advantageous due to the larger community it attracts. A substantial user base means more people to consult, numerous information sources, and a wealth of case studies. While there are smaller, medium, and even large alternatives, having around eighty percent of the community share provides a significant pool of expertise and resources to tap into.

The main reason we opted for it is because the installation is straightforward, and maintenance is made easy as they handle that aspect for you. The extensive knowledge base offers substantial assistance, making it less reliant on individual expertise. I believe it's a solid product, especially for beginners. While it's not free, it's well-suited for more complex tasks. Keep in mind that for intricate functionalities, you might need to develop and create tools beyond what Elastic Cloud offers. If you're considering a cloud-based solution for schema-less documents, Elasticsearch is a solid choice. On the other hand, if you have the resources to handle on-premises installation, I would recommend it for companies with the capability to manage the deployment themselves. Overall, I would rate it eight out of ten.

Public Cloud

We save credentials, new account information, logs from Palantir Panorama, Firefox logs, traffic logs, GlobalProtect logs from our servers, and Active Directory new users. We're still improving this, but not very fast.

I appreciate that Elastic Enterprise Search is easy to use and that we have people on our team who are able to manage it effectively.

We are keeping an eye on other products like QRadar and Splunk in case they offer features that would benefit our company.

We currently use the free version of Elastic Search for some of our logs. However, if we were to use it more extensively, we would need to consider the pricing of the paid plans.

Another area of improvement is stability. 

 I have been using this solution for five years now.

I would rate the stability a seven out of ten. We faced a few issues. 

I would rate the scalability a seven out of ten. 

We don't use the support because we use the free version.

We were able to handle the deployment ourselves. We have one administrator and three users for this solution. So, there are four people in total. 

I use the free version. We use the free version for some logs, but not extensive use.

Overall, I would rate the solution a seven out of ten. The free version is not very useful.

On-premises

We use Elastic Enterprise Search to develop robust and competitive projects. 

We provide clients with a chance to upload a file. They have all the accounts and transactions that they want to do and we have a limit of 10,000. In two minutes, they can have the 10,000 transactions in their accounts.

I would like to see Elastic Enterprise Search focus on interbank transfers, maybe in another way of payments. We have a feature focused on online interbank transfers. But, it would be good to see current payments for workers. They could also provide this same product to the retail clients. The price support could be improved as well. 

We have been using Elastic Enterprise Search for about a year and a half.

Elastic Enterprise Search is stable. On a scale of one to 10, with one being not very stable and 10 being very stable, I give Elastic Enterprise Search a nine. 

Elastic Enterprise Search is scalable. On a scale of one to 10, with one being not scalable and 10 being very scalable, I give Elastic Enterprise Search a 10. 

Elastic Enterprise Search's tech support is good but it could be improved. 

Positive

The initial setup is difficult. On a scale of one to 10, with one being very difficult and 10 being very easy, I would rate Elastic Enterprise Search a two. 

We are continuously integrating new features. Everything we added this month took about a day each to deploy. We have 22 software engineers on the project, along with two tech leads and one solution architect.

The price we pay for Elastic Enterprise Search is very high. We have a complicated banking project with a lot of components, developers, and features. 

On a scale of one to 10, with one being very cheap and 10 being very expensive, I would rate this solution an nine. Their pricing system is highly complex. 

It's a cloud-based service. At that time, we were using AWS, so we could get the same Elasticsearch capabilities from AWS. It was mostly a PaaS service that we could access. We had the Elasticsearch specific server and database hosted on an AWS instance, and then we fed the data to it and tried to fine-tune the algorithm to give the necessary search intelligence that we needed.

We're not using the latest version. We're using a version that was released one year ago.

The whole organization has about half a million users, but at any point of time, a hundred users might be using it.

The AI-based attribute tagging is a valuable feature. It passes through text data and identifies the tag-words and keywords and connects them to various attributes in the whole system. The system was supposed to run through a lot of existing data in terms of which tag-words would reflect which keywords. There was a model built on top of that. We were building a machine-learning model, which passed through all of the data and did the necessary attribute tagging. We couldn't find attribute tagging in other services.

We initially tried to do it in-house, but we couldn't get the accuracy that we wanted. Elasticsearch was quite efficient in terms of getting accuracy with the limited amount of data that we had. We had 10,000 to 20,000 records. Based on that, we had a good amount of accuracy, which we were happy with. There's a lot we can do with customization.

The documentation regarding customization could be better. Other than that, Elasticsearch has very good documentation. We can get a lot of information from forums.

I have worked with this solution for six months. 

The solution is stable.

As far as what we could accomplish, it was scalable, but we didn't have a lot of data that needed to be processed. We had 10,000 records and it was scalable.

We have reached out to tech support when we have had queries, and they respond in time. We didn't have an escalation process, but we had a lot of queries.

We chose Elasticsearch because we could build a model in a short amount of time. It allows us to build a whole setup in one month and get 93% accuracy. Even if you look at the complex AI-based features that we built within a shorter span, we could build that model with high accuracy, which wasn't possible with other search enterprise vendors that we used.

Setup was a little complex, but we had in-house expertise.

The solution needs regular fine-tuning in terms of the data model. As we get more and more data into the system, the predictability and accuracy of the output keeps changing. On the application and DB side, it was fine. Not a lot of maintenance was required.

Deployment was done in-house.

The solution is affordable. Previously, we wasted a lot of time by building our own system, which we could have avoided by moving to Elasticsearch earlier.

I would rate Elasticsearch as eight out of ten. 

Elasticsearch provides a lot of possibilities. You need to understand your requirements and how Elasticsearch can fulfill them. Somebody might be looking at a simple keyword service or attribute tagging. If you don't understand exactly what you're looking for, you'll get lost in their options and waste a lot of time.

Public Cloud

Elastic Enterprise Search is the repository for time series and data from the onsite instrument that monitors variables in our mining infrastructure called tailing dams. We monitor the tailing dams' physical stability and take the information from the sales force and manual data introduced by the operators. The system captures the information in the Elastic Enterprise Searchtime series, and we make calculations and trigger events and alerts based on those calculations. We save them as well as the events and alert times.

Elastic Enterprise Search is a nonstructured database that can manage large amounts of nonstructured data. We also use a structured SQL database. I am unsure why our technical people selected Elastic Enterprise Search. The people that started the project selected open-source software and recommended the ETC component required in the system architecture. The Elastic Enterprise Search has been defined from the beginning of the project and fulfills the project's requirements. However, there is a lack of technical people to develop, implement and optimize equipment operation and web queries. This may be a problem with the provider, and they currently lack the resource to optimize the performance of the database.

Finding skilled people to work with Elastic Enterprise Search in the project team has been difficult. This may be because the development team has not considered it. It is important to improve the database performance because there is a large amount of data and the optimization of the queries and the system's performance are very important.

We also use three other databases, MinIO, PostgreSQL and PostgreSQL. We have a very skilled person on our team that knows how to use all these products. However, he's not responsible for optimization because it's the responsibility of the Indian provider that has to develop the application.

It is fairly stable.

It is a scalable solution. 70 people are working with this solution in the project, 35 on the development team and 20 backend people. We are working on the development, but it's part of the service that the Indian company has to provide. There are about 50 people on their development team who deal with all the development, infrastructure implementation, architecture definition and implementation of the software stack. We are the counterpart of that company.

Since it is open-source, we don't pay licensing fees. In the development and QA environment, we don't pay anything. We, however, have to pay for all the software, subscription, pre-protection and protection.

I rate this solution a seven out of ten. Because it is open-source, there is no technical support provided by the vendor, so we are moving to enterprise subscriptions for each of these products. We are allowed free licenses and implement enterprise or commercial licenses and the production of protections.

An original criterion selects the software stack because they have to be good tools, but they all have to be open-source. Nobody considers it because the original team that started the project worked in an investigation organization and was closer to open-source software.

They are not clear regarding the support of their solution when they go into production. That's why we are updating the licenses to interpret license subscriptions and assume their support for each software component.

It has helped by notifying me when something happens. I deploy my team to the infrastructure to fix the application. However, receiving alerts before something happens would be more beneficial.

New Relic is very similar to Elasticsearch in functionality; it's easier to use.

New Relic could be more flexible, similar to Elasticsearch. It could improve on providing notifications before something happens instead of when something happens.

It is a stable and good platform.

It's scalable. There's no need to worry about the environment. You just configure it, and it runs without issues.

I haven't used their support, however, a colleague I talked to about this platform with has used it.

Positive

The initial setup is not complex. The only part that may require specific knowledge is communicating your cloud environment with New Relic and managing the cloud environment configurations.

Comparing the costs between New Relic and Elasticsearch is difficult as New Relic's cost is for processing metrics, whereas Elasticsearch's cost is for storage.

I recommend New Relic, however, it depends on the specific use case you have. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

Elastic has a lot of products. The one I'm most familiar with is Elastic Observability. It's designed to monitor our applications within an organization. It gives managers visibility into the activity and functionality of applications within the network. I've worked with it both on-premises and in the cloud. It helps us monitor applications and identify any issues. For example, we can see if an application is calling on a database if there are any delays or errors, and what might be causing those problems. It can also give us a proper view of the number of transactions done on the database and other information. It's not just pulling data for us; it's giving us real-time insights into the activities and functionalities of our applications within our network environment.

When users understand the root cause of the problem, they spend less time resolving it. The number one benefit is end-to-end stability. It provides deep visibility into your cloud and distributed applications, from microservices to serverless architectures. It quickly identifies and resolves the root causes of issues, like gaining visibility into all your cloud-based and on-prem applications. It also simplifies issue resolution, leading to faster resolution times and optimized performance. It is achieved through numerous tools, metrics, and application performance fine-tuning systems, ensuring a smooth user experience. That's why many enterprises seek this kind of solution. It provides valuable insights into potential security vulnerabilities, enabling pre-emptive measures and safeguards for your data assets. Then there's data-driven decision-making, which is very important! It breaks down data silos by ingesting all the telemetry data (metrics, logs, etc.) into a single, scalable platform with a contextual data model. This flexibility allows you to collect and visualize any data from any source. Essentially, it pulls data from all sources and guides you in making data-driven decisions for capacity planning, resource allocation, and risk mitigation. Finally, it also fosters collaboration across IT teams.

There are potential improvements based on our client feedback, like unifying the licensing cost structure, which might be helpful for clients. This room for improvement is from my perspective as a salesperson. Because when I give customers the pricing information, they might wonder why there are two different licensing models, unlike competitors like BeyondTrust or Delinea. Delinea also has the same thing with the code.

I have been with this solution for more than six months.

It's very, very stable. Most times, I go through the demo sites, which allows understanding of functionalities and use cases and all of that. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. I would rate the scalability a nine out of ten.

The customer service and support are very nice.

Positive

I have experience with Delinea, ManageEngine, BeyondTrust, IBM and WALLIX. But compared to Elastic, they lack the same level of artificial intelligence capabilities. It's like an all-encompassing package with tons of features. One of those features is the ability to pinpoint the root cause of any problem, whether it's code issues (like it was not written properly), developer errors, or anything else. It goes beyond just surface-level troubleshooting and digs deep to give you the real why. That's what sets it apart from the others. Imagine an application is having some issues. Elastic can tell if it's faulty code, a developer mistake, or anything else. It gives you the true root cause, not just the surface-level symptoms. That's its strength and why it stands out as the industry standard.

The initial setup is not complex to me. I've seen it displayed before in a demo presentation with Jakadaz. The solution is not difficult to use. It's very easy. Even as a non-technical person, I could interact with the application.

The deployment doesn't take long because we have experts who can help. It's available both in the cloud and on-premises, so it depends on the customer's choice.

It is a cost-effective solution. It is not expensive.

I would rate it a nine out of ten for now. It has a lot of features compared to other solutions. Its comprehensiveness and range of features are what make it stand out for application monitoring. I highly recommend it. It's very good because it's efficient, highly scalable, and has high availability. Additionally, cost-effectiveness is crucial in Nigeria due to exchange rates. Organizations need solutions that are affordable, and Elasticsearch fits the bill. I would absolutely recommend it to any organization.

Hybrid Cloud

We have a distributed login environment. We have logs in databases and some in files. We use the solution to centralize everything. It's good for monitoring. 

The solution is useful for observing logs. The observability is good. 

It's good for collecting various types of logs. The metrics on offer are great.

We also collect logs from VMs, and we can look at the CPU and RAM situation to see what is being used. 

The APM for our ITSM tools is helpful. It provides good visibility.

It is scalable.

The solution offers good stability.

The initial setup is easy.

We'd like to see more integration in the future, especially around service desks or other ITSM tools. 

I've been using the solution for two or three years. 

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. 

It is scalable. It's not a problem if you need to expand it. 

We have about 20 people using the solution right now. We're using it in a test environment right now. Once we deploy to production, 300 to 400 people will use it. 

We have never used technical support. 

Our help desk also uses Grafana. We'll use this solution more widely eventually. 

The initial setup is very easy.

We took about a month to deploy the solution. 

We might need about ten people to handle the deployment and maintenance. We're still in the test environment right now. 

We handled the setup ourselves. We did not need outside assistance. 

I'm not sure of the exact licensing costs. I don't deal with that aspect of the solution. 

I'm using the latest version of the solution. I started with version 7.1, and now I use 8.6.

I'd recommend the solution to other users. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. The features and tools are overall very good. 

On-premises