Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS Glue vs Elastic Search comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
AWS Glue is praised for cost-effectiveness and efficiency, though some seek alternatives due to budget constraints.
Sentiment score
6.0
Elastic Search enhances ROI by improving data handling, preemptive monitoring, reducing costs, and offering open-source advantages.
We have not purchased any licensed products, and our use of Elastic Search is purely open-source, contributing positively to our ROI.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
AWS Glue's helpful customer service and documentation are praised, despite occasional support delays and noted technical limitations.
Sentiment score
6.7
Elastic Search's customer service is satisfactory, with strong community resources, though paid support has mixed reviews and improvement needs.
AWS's documentation is reliable, and careful reference often resolves missed upgrade details.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS Glue is praised for its scalable, serverless architecture but criticized for hidden costs; users rate scalability highly.
Sentiment score
7.2
Elasticsearch is widely adopted for its scalability, though challenges arise with large datasets and requiring adequate infrastructure.
For jobs requiring multiple RAM usage, we increase the number of workers accordingly.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS Glue is stable and reliable, performing well with large datasets and integrating smoothly with major platforms.
Sentiment score
7.7
Elastic Search is stable for most users, with occasional issues linked to specific configurations or infrastructure constraints.
 

Room For Improvement

AWS Glue faces challenges with slow start-up, high costs, limited language support, and user interface shortcomings needing improvements.
Elastic Search needs enhanced security, machine learning, scalability, user interfaces, support, integration, licensing, alerting, configuration, and data handling.
Learning the latest functionalities is crucial, and while challenging, it is a vital part of staying current and ensuring an efficient ETL process.
This can create problems for new developers because they have to quickly switch to another version.
 

Setup Cost

AWS Glue's pay-as-you-go model offers flexibility but can be costly, especially with extensive EC2 usage and support subscriptions.
Elastic Search is open-source with scalable pricing, but costs can rise with premium features and complex pricing models.
Costing depends on resource usage, and cost optimization may involve redesigning jobs for flexibility.
 

Valuable Features

AWS Glue offers efficient data cataloging, integration, scalability, cost-effectiveness, and user-friendly ETL features with serverless architecture.
Elastic Search's speed, scalability, flexibility, integration options, and user-friendly interface drive its popularity in enterprises.
For ETL, I feel the performance is excellent. If I create jobs in a standard way, the performance is great, and maintenance is also seamless.
Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS Glue
Ranking in Cloud Data Integration
1st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Elastic Search
Ranking in Cloud Data Integration
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
Indexing and Search (1st), Search as a Service (1st), Vector Databases (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of AWS Glue is 24.8%, up from 24.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Search is 1.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Muthuvel Sivaraman - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles a huge volume of data and is serverless, but it can be considered costly by some users
We use Amazon's services to provide technical support for the product. If you want to have support, Oracle and others offer a single support, and other tools have a direct support window. For Amazon, we need to pay 10 percent of my billing amount for the tool to get support services. Whether to raise a support ticket or not is an issue since ten percent is a huge amount. My company ends up using all the options without help from support. It is very difficult for any common man to understand why there is a need to pay ten percent for support. If I find an issue in the product, and I need to get support from AWS to fix it, then I need to pay ten percent of the tool's bill amount to Amazon. AWS is a very tricky tool because everything is evolving nowadays. AWS engineers are getting hired from other places, and even after that, if I am not getting any technical support, then things will be very nasty. There are some good engineers who help users outside the normal support cycle, but it doesn't meet their needs. I rate the technical support a four out of ten.
Anand_Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Captures data from all other sources and becomes a MOM aka monitoring of monitors
Scalability and ROI are the areas they have to improve. Their license terms are based on the number of cores. If you increase the number of cores, it becomes very difficult to manage at a large scale. For example, if I have a $3 million project, I won't sell it because if we're dealing with a 10 TB or 50 TB system, there are a lot of systems and applications to monitor, and I have to make an MOM (Mean of Max) for everything. This is because of the cost impact. Also, when you have horizontal scaling, it's like a multi-story building with only one elevator. You have to run around, and it's not efficient. Even the smallest task becomes difficult. That's the problem with horizontal scaling. They need to improve this because if they increase the cores and adjust the licensing accordingly, it would make more sense.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How do you select the right cloud ETL tool?
AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
How does Talend Open Studio compare with AWS Glue?
We reviewed AWS Glue before choosing Talend Open Studio. AWS Glue is the managed ETL (extract, transform, and load) from Amazon Web Services. AWS Glue enables AWS users to create and manage jobs in...
What are the most common use cases for AWS Glue?
AWS Glue's main use case is for allowing users to discover, prepare, move, and integrate data from multiple sources. The product lets you use this data for analytics, application development, or ma...
What do you like most about ELK Elasticsearch?
Logsign provides us with the capability to execute multiple queries according to our requirements. The indexing is very high, making it effective for storing and retrieving logs. The real-time anal...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ELK Elasticsearch?
I am not directly involved with pricing or setup costs. While I know a portion is open-source, a paid version might be necessary.
What needs improvement with ELK Elasticsearch?
There should be more stability. When we started learning it, new versions came out frequently in one quarter with extended features. This can create problems for new developers because they have to...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Elastic Enterprise Search, Swiftype, Elastic Cloud
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

bp, Cerner, Expedia, Finra, HESS, intuit, Kellog's, Philips, TIME, workday
T-Mobile, Adobe, Booking.com, BMW, Telegraph Media Group, Cisco, Karbon, Deezer, NORBr, Labelbox, Fingerprint, Relativity, NHS Hospital, Met Office, Proximus, Go1, Mentat, Bluestone Analytics, Humanz, Hutch, Auchan, Sitecore, Linklaters, Socren, Infotrack, Pfizer, Engadget, Airbus, Grab, Vimeo, Ticketmaster, Asana, Twilio, Blizzard, Comcast, RWE and many others.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Glue vs. Elastic Search and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.