Forcepoint ONE Reviews

We use Bitglass for real-time scanning and its unique VM that enables reverse proxy capabilities. Bitglass can also act as an IDP for us when we don't have an identity provider.

The solution enforces our devices no matter where it is located even across our cloud devices reducing the manual work we have to do.

By default without a policy, Bitglass has the capability to notify the admin of multiple or simultaneous logins across a wide range of geographical regions. The solution will take action if the same credentials are used in multiple regions at the same time, preventing unauthorized access.

Bitglass integration with some IDP providers needs improvement. Currently, the solution is not compatible with Azure AD for third-party authentication. The fraud proxy in the SmartEdge agent is not compatible with Forcepoint DLP or a web hybrid agent. I would like the developers to consolidate multiple agents across systems for better integration.

I have been using the solution for seven months.

The solution is stable. I have not seen any performance or availability issues with the solution.

The solution is extremely scalable. The solution can increase as our resources increase. One of our customers has 15,000 users.

The initial setup is straightforward. The solution is a soft application so the portal that is generated gives us access and the vendor does everything required. We get our login as a master administrator and from there we can onboard more addresses. The last step is to integrate with the cloud application.

Bitglass provides a good return on investment eventually.

When considering only the cost, the solution may appear to be costly; however, when evaluated in terms of commercial value, Bitglass is not expensive.

I give the solution a nine out of ten.

Bitglass is a good solution that can be consolidated with other solutions from the same vendor.

The product is important for protecting the environment and information.

The platform's cloud-based console is quite valuable. Additionally, its integration with DLP is effective. 

The solution's integration with other products needs improvement. 

We have been using Forcepoint ONE for two years. 

I rate the product stability an eight. 

Our clients are typically enterprise businesses with around 1000 Forcepoint ONE users.

We have encountered numerous issues with support over the past two years, particularly with response times.

Neutral

We used other solutions before. 

The setup is relatively straightforward. We encountered challenges while integrating it with WhatsApp. I rate the process an eight. 

The product is reasonably priced compared to other vendors. I rate the pricing a two or three. 

The platform has a great capacity for protecting and managing data.

I rate an eight out of ten. 

Forcepoint ONE is a very, very good product, especially for my SOC (security operations center) team though you'll need to get a lot of training to optimize the solution and ensure that it meets your needs. Forcepoint ONE is a very good monitoring solution, and it gives my organization a lot of information on how to boost security and how to keep new products or new applications secure.

Forcepoint ONE is okay for me, and I find it a very good solution. Its most valuable feature is monitoring. Its monitoring is very good, and it can communicate with a SIEM system. I also find the DLP feature of Forcepoint ONE good.

One area for improvement in Forcepoint ONE is that you'll need more training to install the solution yourself. I practiced in a laboratory and I needed more technical information to do the installation.

In the laboratory, Forcepoint ONE is stable, but I don't know if it's stable in a real environment because I have not installed it yet in the real world. In a laboratory setting, it is pretty stable.

Forcepoint ONE is a very scalable solution.

The technical support for Forcepoint ONE is very good, at least when I needed support in a laboratory setting. On a scale of one to five, with five being the best, I'm rating the support a four.

In terms of the initial setup for Forcepoint ONE, I'm rating it a three out of five. I'm giving it a score of 60 percent out of one hundred percent. I currently don't have an implementation strategy, but if I need to implement the solution, I would need more training, or even take a special course on how to implement Forcepoint ONE.

Forcepoint ONE was deployed through an integrator or consultant.

I don't have information on the ROI from Forcepoint ONE.

The licensing cost for Forcepoint ONE would depend on the features, but the pricing is very competitive here in Brazil. The solution offers a good price, and I would rate it a three or a four in terms of pricing. I don't have information on whether there are additional costs apart from the standard licensing fees for Forcepoint ONE.

My company didn't evaluate other options because it is an integrator of Forcepoint ONE, so it only has Forcepoint ONE as its solution. This means I didn't do any testing with competitors such as Zscaler and Netskope.

My company is a partner and reseller of Forcepoint ONE. I work with the solution, though I'm not as experienced with it. I had my training in the Forcepoint laboratory in Brazil because I just started working with the solution, but I know how Forcepoint ONE works, how to use it, and how to implement it. I'm using the latest version of the solution.

The number of staff required to deploy and maintain Forcepoint ONE depends on the number of users because the solution can also be used individually or by a single user.

My advice for people looking into implementing Forcepoint ONE is to take a course or go into training because the solution may seem easy, but it's not, particularly during implementation, because it would still depend on your tool. You need to understand your tool well and how you can adapt it to Forcepoint ONE. The solution is not easy if it doesn't have a direct integration with your tool. When you go direct to the cloud, there's no problem, but when you need it to be a hybrid solution, it could be a bit difficult in terms of integrating it well. The integration, though it's not very, very difficult, still requires attention and care for it to be successful.

My rating for Forcepoint ONE is eight out of ten. For me to rate it a ten out of ten, the support, price, and functionality should first be improved. There would be a need to speak with the Forcepoint team about it, and the team is very, very dedicated in terms of explaining and helping you understand the solution.

• Location proximity mapping
• Data type inventory
• Simple integration

It allows a window into who is sharing what types of data internally and externally. It allows us know where sensitive data is really stored and offers the ability to quarantine based on data types and sharing criteria.

• Reporting
• Simpler policy creation

I have used it for 16 months.

The cloud-based portal tends to get slow as the number of events increase.

The sales staff promised more than they can deliver, but the technical staff is excellent.

I did not previously use a different solution.

Initial setup was simple.

Negotiate for the pricing model that fits your budget. The vendor is willing to customize pricing.

Before choosing this product, we also evaluated CloudLock, CipherCloud and Skyhigh Networks.

Take your time and have each vendor set up an actual proof of concept, rather than just relying on a demo. Get your network and support staff engaged in the process early on because they will be instrumental in deployment and support. Know what you’re trying to accomplish.