Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Forcepoint ONE based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Cisco Umbrella, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Internet Access.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Forcepoint ONE surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive data protection and unified security management, ensuring optimal threat defense and seamless user experience with advanced AI-driven analytics and real-time visibility.
Forcepoint Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Forcepoint, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco Umbrella excels in rapid deployment and economic pricing, attracting buyers focused on efficiency. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE, with higher setup costs, offers advanced threat analytics for buyers prioritizing comprehensive data security. Cisco's swift setup contrasts with Forcepoint's thorough configuration requirements, emphasizing respective deployment preferences.
Prisma Access offers robust threat prevention and scalable cloud-based security with superior integration and compliance. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE features customizable controls and application-centric solutions for comprehensive data protection with flexible deployment, appealing to tech buyers valuing integration and data control.
Zscaler Internet Access delivers flexible cloud-based security and efficient threat prevention, appealing to cost-conscious tech buyers. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE provides sophisticated data protection and integration with endpoint security, attracting industries needing stringent data security despite a higher investment.
Zscaler Internet Access has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making Zscaler a higher-end option in terms of upfront expenses.
Zscaler Internet Access has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, making Zscaler a higher-end option in terms of upfront expenses.
Lookout excels in threat detection and mobile security with ease of integration and competitive pricing. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced data protection and cloud security features, appealing to businesses prioritizing robust security and advanced capabilities over initial costs.
Lookout has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, making it a less economical initial option, while Forcepoint ONE offers a cost-effective setup, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly implementation.
Lookout has a higher setup cost compared to Forcepoint ONE, making it a less economical initial option, while Forcepoint ONE offers a cost-effective setup, appealing to those prioritizing budget-friendly implementation.
Cloudflare One stands out for its straightforward deployment and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced data protection features, justifying potential higher costs for enterprises needing enhanced security and integration assistance.
Cloudflare One offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Forcepoint ONE involves a higher setup cost, emphasizing its focus on enterprises requiring more advanced security configurations.
Cloudflare One offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while Forcepoint ONE involves a higher setup cost, emphasizing its focus on enterprises requiring more advanced security configurations.
iboss offers effective threat detection and customizable security policies. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE stands out with advanced threat protection and data loss prevention. Buyers may choose iboss for cost-effective solutions or opt for Forcepoint ONE for extensive features and smoother deployment.
iboss involves higher setup costs compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The difference in pricing underscores the diverse strategy each company employs in introducing their services to new clients.
iboss involves higher setup costs compared to Forcepoint ONE, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. The difference in pricing underscores the diverse strategy each company employs in introducing their services to new clients.
Check Point Harmony SASE offers cost-effective pricing and simplified deployment, ideal for businesses seeking swift integration. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE delivers advanced features and security controls, attracting buyers investing in comprehensive protections and complex configurations with strong post-deployment support.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Forcepoint ONE presents an economical setup option, providing a cost-effective initial deployment.
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while Forcepoint ONE presents an economical setup option, providing a cost-effective initial deployment.
Skyhigh Security offers competitive pricing with strong integration, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and ease of use. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE provides extensive security features and scalability, making it attractive for buyers focused on comprehensive and customizable security solutions.
Fortinet FortiGate SWG provides effective pricing and strong customer support through comprehensive security controls and hardware-centric strengths. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers robust cloud-native features and flexible remote access, appealing to those valuing innovative technology over lower costs.
Fortinet FortiGate SWG offers a more cost-effective setup with fewer complexities, while Forcepoint ONE incurs higher initial costs but provides robust security features, highlighting a trade-off between cost efficiency and advanced capabilities.
Fortinet FortiGate SWG offers a more cost-effective setup with fewer complexities, while Forcepoint ONE incurs higher initial costs but provides robust security features, highlighting a trade-off between cost efficiency and advanced capabilities.
F5 BIG-IP APM excels in network access control and identity management with flexible deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers advanced data protection within a robust cloud-based architecture, facilitating straightforward deployment and responsive support, justifying its premium pricing and comprehensive ROI.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.
F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) has a higher initial setup cost, while Forcepoint ONE offers a more budget-friendly option with lower upfront expenses.
Fortinet FortiProxy offers cost-effective pricing and strong support, appealing to businesses valuing speed and scalability. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE's comprehensive data protection and integration features attract organizations needing advanced security solutions despite higher initial costs. FortiProxy excels in simplicity, while Forcepoint ONE provides thorough support.
Axis Security excels in access management and easy integration with smooth deployment, appealing to budget-oriented buyers. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE offers comprehensive threat protection and customizable policies, appealing to businesses prioritizing advanced features, despite higher costs and a slightly complex setup.
Axis Security offers a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, while Forcepoint ONE incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting significant differences in budget considerations between the two solutions.
Axis Security offers a straightforward setup with low upfront costs, while Forcepoint ONE incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting significant differences in budget considerations between the two solutions.
Menlo Secure excels in cost-efficiency and ease of isolation technology deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Forcepoint ONE provides versatile data protection and seamless system integration, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive features and adaptable policy enforcement despite higher initial costs.
