Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Forcepoint ONE pros and cons

Vendor: Forcepoint

4.2 out of 5

12 reviews
100% willing to recommend

404 followers

Pros & Cons summary

Forcepoint ONE secures data through monitoring and controls like file fingerprinting and sensitive detection. It is strong in CASB functionality, HIPAA compliance support, and simple, agentless deployment. Features like Zero Trust Network Access enhance security for remote users. Limits include lack of endpoint DLP and multi-factor authentication integration issues. There is a 15-minute lag with password changes, and more training and information are needed, alongside challenges in verifying certain feature functions.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Forcepoint ONE excels in securing against data leakage with capabilities like proxy-based inspection of data in motion and API scanning for data at rest.

The core CASB component of Forcepoint ONE is crucial, enabling policies that restrict cloud application access to company devices only.

Forcepoint ONE supports HIPAA compliance by facilitating DLP rules that prevent unauthorized sharing of personal health information.

The agentless setup of Forcepoint ONE simplifies deployment, allowing rapid implementation without the need for extensive agent distribution.

Forcepoint ONE enhances web security through features like Zero Trust Network Access and effective protection for remote user access to private applications.

CONS

There is a need for advancement into endpoint DLP as Forcepoint ONE is currently limited to cloud applications and does not address endpoint management.

There are integration issues with non-Duo multi-factor authentication tools, requiring additional effort to align with other vendors' solutions.

Latency issues occur when Active Directory passwords are changed, with access delays lasting around 15 minutes through Bitglass.

Initial communication challenges within Bitglass required escalation to higher levels before being resolved efficiently.

Integrating Forcepoint ONE with other products and IDP providers needs improvement to enhance interoperability.

Forcepoint ONE Pros review quotes

reviewer1400070

Senior Security Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Aug 5, 2020

The solution is very good when it comes to securing us against data leakage, because of the other proxy. It also has API scanning or data at rest. It inspects data in motion, which is the proxy, and then it has the data at rest, which is the API scanning. We can inspect for anything we want: file fingerprinting, PHI-sensitive data, PCI-sensitive data. It does not matter. We can usually find it and block it in transit and do our remediation with it. It could either be block, encrypt, or allow and watermark the file to follow it and see where it goes. It allows for those different scenarios.

Read full review

DO

Sr. Director of Information Security & Enterprise Architecture at Childrens Home Society of Florida

Aug 26, 2020

The biggest thing that I like about this product is that it's easy to use and teach. When we have somebody new starting to work with the product, it's easy to teach them. It's also easy to use the product as it does so much.

Read full review

reviewer1412328

Cyber Security Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Aug 30, 2020

We are able to verify what is getting saved out onto the cloud. It allows us to have some DLP rules, since we have to be HIPAA compliant. If some personal health information has been uploaded to Office 365, then we are able to detect that sort of thing and account for it. We have set up rules to prevent people from doing that.

Read full review

Free Report: Forcepoint ONE Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint ONE. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1400646

CTO at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Aug 6, 2020

The core CASB solution is the most valuable part. It allows us to put policies in place around which devices can log into our cloud applications. We have a policy that states that only company devices can access these cloud applications.

Read full review

DL

Vice President, Corporate Information Security & Chief Security Officer at Ricoh Americas

Sep 1, 2020

The initial setup was straightforward, which was a huge win. That mostly goes to the fact that they are agentless. We didn't have to sit there deploying thousands of agents and all the things that go along with that type of deployment. We were up and running very quickly.

Read full review

reviewer1416423

Director, Cloud & Data Security at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Sep 7, 2020

The solution’s AJAX-VM provides constant reverse proxy uptime. It has been very positive for our security operations. When people are trying to access the SaaS solution, it protects us from downloading any of that data and experiencing any type of attacks

Read full review

AK

System Engineer at NetScout Systems

Mar 20, 2024

The most valuable features of Forcepoint include Zero Trust Network Access and remote user protection for private applications.

Read full review

Senior Executive Account Manager at Grupo Binario

May 25, 2022

Forcepoint ONE is okay for me, and I find it a very good solution. Its most valuable feature is monitoring. Its monitoring is very good, and it can communicate with a SIEM system. I also find the DLP feature of Forcepoint ONE good.

Read full review

Edwin Eze-Osiago

Regional Solutions Manager Sub Saharan Africa at Infodata Professional Services Limited

Feb 24, 2023

By default without a policy, Bitglass has the capability to notify the admin of multiple or simultaneous logins across a wide range of geographical regions.

Read full review

reviewer2203710

IT Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 22, 2024

The platform's feature that has been most beneficial for our web security is its capability to replicate rules.

Read full review

Show 1 more reviews (out of 11)

Forcepoint ONE Cons review quotes

reviewer1400070

Senior Security Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees

Aug 5, 2020

I wish they would advance more into the endpoint DLP solution. Currently they do not do anything around endpoint, they're still strictly cloud-based. The forward proxy is really the only thing they do. What I would like to see them do is to scan machines, workstations and servers, for information we might not want on those machines. That would be huge.

Read full review

DO

Sr. Director of Information Security & Enterprise Architecture at Childrens Home Society of Florida

Aug 26, 2020

Integration into different multi-factor authentication tools. On their page, they tout Duo, but I don't use Duo. I use another vendor. Not that they don't interact, but it takes a little bit more doing. Any amount of efficiencies here would help.

Read full review

reviewer1412328

Cyber Security Officer at a insurance company with 51-200 employees

Aug 30, 2020

In our environment, when an Active Directory password changes, we tend to have some latency issues with access. It takes about 15 minutes before that password is accessible through Bitglass after the change. That would be the major thing I see as a negative.

Read full review

Free Report: Forcepoint ONE Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Forcepoint ONE. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: December 2024.

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1400646

CTO at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

Aug 6, 2020

Their new SASE (secure access service edge) product would have been the one thing I would have requested. Now that they have that platform, I'd like to see it as integrated and seamless as possible with the core product. That's what they're working towards and that's where we're seeing the advancements.

Read full review

reviewer1416423

Director, Cloud & Data Security at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Sep 7, 2020

Initially, we had some challenges that Bitglass resolved quickly. The challenges were around communication. There didn't seem like there was the right level of communication within the Bitglass organization. Once we brought the issues up at a higher level, then they were resolved.

Read full review

AK

System Engineer at NetScout Systems

Mar 20, 2024

Areas for improvement for the platform include addressing scalability and architecture concerns, especially for large deployments involving more than 500 or 1,000 users.

Read full review

Senior Executive Account Manager at Grupo Binario

May 25, 2022

One area for improvement in Forcepoint ONE is that you'll need more training to install the solution yourself. I practiced in a laboratory and I needed more technical information to do the installation.

Read full review

Edwin Eze-Osiago

Regional Solutions Manager Sub Saharan Africa at Infodata Professional Services Limited

Feb 24, 2023

Bitglass integration with some IDP providers needs improvement.

Read full review

reviewer2203710

IT Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 22, 2024

We encounter challenges in determining whether certain features for blocking certain file types or preventing automatic downloads are functioning correctly.

Read full review

SF

Consultant at SATELITE.COM

Aug 2, 2024

The solution's integration with other products needs improvement.

Read full review

Product Categories

Product Categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Cisco Umbrella vs Forcepoint ONE

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Forcepoint ONE

Zscaler Internet Access vs Forcepoint ONE

Lookout vs Forcepoint ONE

Cloudflare One vs Forcepoint ONE

iboss vs Forcepoint ONE

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Forcepoint ONE

Skyhigh Security vs Forcepoint ONE

Fortinet FortiGate SWG vs Forcepoint ONE

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Forcepoint ONE

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Forcepoint ONE

Fortinet FortiProxy vs Forcepoint ONE

Axis Security vs Forcepoint ONE

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs Forcepoint ONE

Trend Micro Web Security vs Forcepoint ONE

See all alternatives

Product Categories

Product Categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG)

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons

Cisco Umbrella vs Forcepoint ONE

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Forcepoint ONE

Zscaler Internet Access vs Forcepoint ONE

Lookout vs Forcepoint ONE

Cloudflare One vs Forcepoint ONE

iboss vs Forcepoint ONE

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Forcepoint ONE

Skyhigh Security vs Forcepoint ONE

Fortinet FortiGate SWG vs Forcepoint ONE

F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM) vs Forcepoint ONE

Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway vs Forcepoint ONE

Fortinet FortiProxy vs Forcepoint ONE

Axis Security vs Forcepoint ONE

Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway vs Forcepoint ONE

Trend Micro Web Security vs Forcepoint ONE

See all alternatives

Related questions

19

Evaluating CASBs. Looking for community feedback on some vendors.

23

When evaluating Web Security Gateways, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?

28

What is the best security web gateway?

42

Is Netskope's SWG as good as the Zscaler SWG?

29

What secure web gateway do you recommend?

2

Why is Secure Web Gateways (SWG) important for companies?