Git Reviews

I use Git mainly to create new reports to store my project and to keep track of the changes I made in my code. So these are the main reasons why all people use Git.

I did use it in my organization as well. I did use it personally, but it was very easy to use it by yourself, especially when you create and upload your code, it's easy. If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated. So, when I started using it in my organization, It was a bit messy, but I finally got it.

Speaking about features, it helps to keep track of your code if it changes, especially to find who made the changes. The solution also makes it easy for other people to change your code.

I don't think it does need any improvement for now since Git is a free, open-source project.

To be honest, I didn't even get close to seeing all its current features. So, I can't imagine any new features that I would be able to recommend.

If it was possible to pay for a Git solution, I would pay for it. However, it's difficult in my country. So I mainly enjoy the free solution.

I have been using Git for four years. Also, I am using the solution's latest version.

Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I don't think that it is even possible to count it as a scalable tool.

I never tried to reach tech support.

GitHub and GitLab were pretty good repositories for Git servers. So, I was using the solution on the cloud.

I did not deploy it. I was using already deployed solutions like GitLab and GitHub. I never did even try to deploy it.

I think it's a good investment, but I'm using the free version of the solution.

My recommendation to others to use the solution would depend on their usage. If it's for their personal use, it's going to be easy. But if he was going to use it in an organization or for a personal project with a lot of friends or colleagues, then that would be a different story. You need to be concentrated, and I think a lot before making any changes to the code because every mistake can create a lot of problems.

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.

We use Git for storing software, development, and tracking versions. We have plans to use it for ODI as well, mainly to unify software version tracking. Although ODI already has its own internal versioning control, we can also transfer it to Git.

The implementation is easy.

The UI can be more user-friendly.

I have been using Git for around four years.

Git is stable.

I believe Git is scalable.

I give Git an eight out of ten.

We have a few hundred end users.

I recommend Git to others.

We use the tool to store codes. 

Our team members can work together and save the code in a single repository. 

The product needs to improve its UI. 

I am using the tool for four to five years. 

The product is stable. 

My company has more than 1000 users for the solution. 

The software's technical support is good. 

Positive

The product's initial setup is easy. 

The tool is an open-source product. 

I would rate the product a ten out of ten. 

The primary use case is to keep track of changes and maintain control, and it helps contain your code and is useful for collaboration.

One feature I find valuable is that it's a one-shot solution. Also, every software company has a requirement to use Git.

I am trying to understand why they removed the credential because it has been a great feature. But yeah, that's not looking good on me. Moreover, Git should increase security to reduce risk. 

Another improvement could be that it is easy to install but complex to set up.

I have been using this solution for ten years. We always use the latest version in our company.

It is a stable solution that has been fine for me for ten years.

I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. Everyone can use it, and there are over 200 uses in my company.

The initial setup is a bit complex because it is open source.

We deployed it from some commands, which took just a few seconds. It's open source, so there is no need for a consultant.

Many tutorials are available online, and one should search for them and go through them before doing anything.

Overall, I would rate it a ten out of ten.

We use the solution for two purposes: first, we collaborate with the DevOps team, sharing our code; and second, we commit to a local repository, then push it to the distribution repository.

The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access.

The UI can be more user-friendly.

I have been using the solution for two years.

I give the stability a ten out of ten.

I give the scalability a nine out of ten.

We have thousands of users.

We switched to Git because we had distance access issues with our previous solution.

I give the solution an eight out of ten.

I recommend the solution to other users. 

I use the solution for website management. 

The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly. 

I have been using the product for ten years. 

I used a version control software called Bazaar. I switched to Git since everyone is using it. 

The tool's setup is straightforward. I could complete the solution's deployment in two minutes. 

The tool is free. 

I would rate the solution a five out of ten. There are better solutions out there than Git. 

We use the product for software development and version control. It helps us to maintain a safe repository of our development. 

Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do. 

The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter. 

I have been working with the solution for seven years. 

The product is stable. 

There is no technical support since we use the open source version. We find support mainly on the forums. 

We use the open source version. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. The product is the best in the industry. 

Git is used for version control.

Our extensive IT department collaborates on various projects, utilizing Git to manage versions effectively. One significant advantage is the ability to maintain multiple versions of the same code, even when offline. This is particularly beneficial in scenarios where internet connectivity is not available, enabling individuals to work on their code seamlessly. Ultimately, this is a crucial benefit for our team's productivity and market competitiveness.

All of the features in Git are useful.

The solution could improve by having more customization.

I have been using Git for a few years.

The stability is good.

I rate the stability of Git a ten out of ten.

We have approximately 500 people using the solution.

The solution is scalable.

I have not used the support.

I have used solutions prior to Git.

The setup of Git is straightforward. The time it takes to set up depends on the size of the project.

When we're doing things manually, but now we use automation tools. When there is a request made it is automated and deployed in the project.

We did the implementation in-house. We have a team that handles the implementation.

A few people in each team have to do the maintenance of the solution.

I would recommend people start using Git. Users can work on an offline copy without internet connectivity and later sync their changes once online. This process is effortless and speedy. Additionally, it is highly secure. After setting up an Azure account, integration with other tools is possible, allowing for continuous integration and deployment.

I rate Git out of ten.