Bitbucket and Git are two prominent tools widely used for version control in software development. Based on user reviews, Git appears to hold a slight advantage in terms of overall features, despite Bitbucket receiving favorable feedback on pricing and support.
Features: Bitbucket users appreciate its integration with Jira, Atlassian ecosystem, and built-in continuous delivery capabilities. Git users value its distributed version control, branching, and merging capabilities. Git’s feature set, particularly its flexibility in handling large projects, gives it an edge.
Room for Improvement: Bitbucket users highlight issues with performance and the need for better documentation. Git users find the initial setup complex and express a need for improved graphical tools. While both have areas for development, Git's steep learning curve is a common concern among its users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket's cloud-based deployment is praised for its simplicity, and user reviews commend its reliable customer service. Git’s deployment, being more versatile with options for both cloud and local setups, is considered harder to configure. Users of Git have mixed feelings about support, suggesting room for improvement in service quality.
Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket users appreciate the competitive pricing, especially for small teams, and consider the ROI satisfactory. Git, although considered worth the investment due to its robust features, receives mixed reviews concerning cost efficiency. Bitbucket’s straightforward pricing appears to be more appealing to budget-conscious users.
I would rate their technical support as seven out of ten for their quality of service.
We need a script that can automatically integrate specified changes at certain times without manual intervention.
Scalability involves vertical or horizontal expansion, and adjustments need to be made based on requirements.
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided.
Stability has some glitches and bugs.
The most valuable features are the scripts used for migration purposes and to create new repository releases.
Bitbucket is a team-oriented Git-based code hosting and collaboration solution. The best-in-class Jira and Trello integrations in Bitbucket are meant to bring the entire software team together to complete a project. Bitbucket gives your team a single location to collaborate on code from concept to cloud deployment, to generate quality code through automated testing, and to deploy code with confidence.
There are three deployment options for Bitbucket:
This has some advantages over Bitbucket Server:
Bitbucket Features
Bitbucket has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Reviews from Real Users
Bitbucket stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its robust traceability and user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
One PeerSpot reviewer, a Developer III at an Information Technology at a energy/utilities company, writes, “Bitbucket has improved our organization because it has simplified and streamlined our developer communication code and review process. It is also much more visual.” He adds, “Bitbucket's traceability is great. Being able to see pool requests is just a great thing for collaboration.”
Kajal P., Quality Assurance Manager at a tech services company, notes, “The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
