Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs GitHub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Bitbucket's support receives mixed reviews, with concerns about communication delays and a preference for third-party assistance.
Sentiment score
8.3
GitHub's community support is valued for responsiveness, but official support receives mixed reviews on consistency and responsiveness.
I would rate their technical support as seven out of ten for their quality of service.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.6
Bitbucket needs improvements in branching, code reviews, integration, interface, permissions, search, collaboration, and customization to address user concerns.
Sentiment score
6.9
GitHub users seek enhanced integrations, security, user interface, DevOps, AI, search, navigation, project management, reporting, and compliance features.
We need a script that can automatically integrate specified changes at certain times without manual intervention.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Bitbucket is praised for scalability and architecture, but users note potential cost issues and necessary branch management.
Sentiment score
6.8
GitHub efficiently scales for small to large teams, managing thousands of developers, extensive code, and complex deployments seamlessly.
Scalability involves vertical or horizontal expansion, and adjustments need to be made based on requirements.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
4.8
Bitbucket offers competitive, scalable pricing suitable for various business sizes, with free and tiered plans, plus annual discounts.
Sentiment score
6.4
Enterprise users find GitHub cost-effective despite challenging license management and tier-based pricing, with extra support incurring additional charges.
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.6
Bitbucket is highly reliable, with minor issues quickly resolved, though a better backup system is desired for recovery ease.
Sentiment score
8.7
GitHub is stable and reliable, effectively managing workloads with few issues, praised for high availability and suitability for companies.
Stability has some glitches and bugs.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
7.8
Bitbucket provides strong security, tool integration, and user-friendly features, enhancing collaboration and code management for effective repository handling.
Sentiment score
8.7
GitHub provides advanced code management, collaboration, and security features, integrating seamlessly with tools to support development needs efficiently.
The most valuable features are the scripts used for migration purposes and to create new repository releases.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
88
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 36.2%, up from 30.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.5%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Julian Lewis - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better
I'm mainly using Bitbucket as a code repository for storing the configurations and templates of my monitoring tools. We have them stored locally, and Bitbucket manages changes and builds, so we have a means of rolling back if there are any issues.  There are about 10 to 15 users in the company at…
AjayKrishna - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces project delivery times and costs
I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
49%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams. Its free options can also benefit enterprises, making it co...
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
In term of improvements, I cannot think of any particular features missing or needing enhancement at this moment.
What do you like most about GitHub?
The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
I have not paid for GitHub as I use the free version for personal projects. Organizations may take separate servers from GitHub based on their needs, yet I am unaware of the pricing details.
What needs improvement with GitHub?
GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code. Introducing a feature to manage and resolve conflicts directly within the application rather than ...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.