Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs GitHub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 36.4%, up from 31.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Julian Lewis - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a good solution for storing code, but the usability and integration could be better
I'm mainly using Bitbucket as a code repository for storing the configurations and templates of my monitoring tools. We have them stored locally, and Bitbucket manages changes and builds, so we have a means of rolling back if there are any issues.  There are about 10 to 15 users in the company at…
AjayKrishna - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces project delivery times and costs
I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"It allows me to track the code from ten years back, which is incredibly useful when trying to understand certain implementations in a project."
"It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"Bitbucket is an integral part of our CI/CD project."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"The support team is good."
"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."
"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."
"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."
"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."
"I like the CI/CD features."
"The learning curve is small."
"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."
 

Cons

"There are many places where the product could be expanded to make it a more complete solution."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"Fine tuning for procedures and features related to analytics and code validation is needed."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"One of the areas the solution could improve on is when there is a merging conflict it is quite confusing. When I am having a merging conflict I get stuck on the page, then I need to search how to handle the particular problem. For example, finding what the commands are which can be used."
"The solution is not user-friendly. Right now, the solution is not so easy to understand. It needs to update its design and overall user experience."
"Even with the automation, we've had some situations where we've had mistakes. They've integrated things into the wrong place, so there's a fairly steep learning curve."
"It would be beneficial to have a straightforward mechanism for integrating the initial tasks defined in Bitbucket with Jira when the need arises."
"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."
"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."
"We face issues with synchronization while working with teams."
"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."
"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."
"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."
"The sign in process is a bit difficult. Signing up was challenging at that time."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"Bitbucket is an inexpensive product."
"We find that the pricing is very affordable."
"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."
"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."
"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."
"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."
"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."
"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."
"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."
"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."
"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
50%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
12%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
In Bitbucket, manual processes are needed to handle changes between repositories. Automation for this process would be beneficial. We need a script that can automatically integrate specified change...
What do you like most about GitHub?
The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.
What needs improvement with GitHub?
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.