Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub comparison

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,282 Views
1,022 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atlassian SourceTree

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

GitHub and Atlassian SourceTree are both prominent players in version control and management. GitHub appears to have the upper hand with its robust online collaboration tools and extensive community support, whereas SourceTree distinguishes itself with its superior desktop client experience for managing local Git repositories.

Features: GitHub's valuable features include advanced security, extensive code hosting capabilities, and seamless integration with numerous tools, which enhances collaboration. SourceTree offers a visually appealing interface for branch management, convenient undo options for specific changes, and powerful conflict resolution tools like KDiff3.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its user experience by offering more intuitive navigation and better integration with IDEs. SourceTree might benefit from improved performance speeds, expanded third-party integrations, and a more modernized interface to compete with other Git clients. Both could bolster user support channels for better real-time assistance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub's cloud-based nature means it requires no installation, offering instant setup, making it ideal for remote teams seeking easy collaboration. Its extensive documentation and community resources are pivotal. SourceTree requires desktop installation, appealing more to those who prefer offline access, with detailed guides and troubleshooting support enhancing the user experience.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub operates on a tiered pricing model, starting with free public repositories and scaling to paid private repositories, maximizing ROI through collaboration tools and integrated features. SourceTree is free for individual developers, attracting those requiring a strong local Git client without incurring costs. GitHub’s ROI is augmented by its integration capabilities, while SourceTree offers value through its cost-free setup.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlassian SourceTree vs. GitHub Report (Updated: January 2025).

Atlassian SourceTree vs. GitHub

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree

Ranking in Version Control

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 5.3%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.3%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Francisco Castrillo

Coach Agile Architecture & DevOps at Sistemas Humanos

Allows fast and effective management of branches and integration

For me, the branches graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."

"The tool's UI is good."

"Atlassian SourceTree is a very stable product."

"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"The solution has been stable for us."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

"I like the CI/CD features."

"There are no issues. It's simple, easy, and fully compatible from my perspective with Git."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The product's UI needs improvement."

"People think that Visual Studio Code is more intuitive and can serve dual purposes for development and as a client to push or pull code."

"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."

"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."

"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."

"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a fee for using SourceTree."

"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."

"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

University

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Atlassian SourceTree?

The initial setup is straightforward.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?

I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite.

What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?

There can be improvements in the way the messages are displayed in the tool. The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

Git vs Atlassian SourceTree

Comparisons

Compared 40% of the time

Bitbucket vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 25% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 16% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs Atlassian SourceTree

Compared 6% of the time

More Atlassian SourceTree Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Atlassian SourceTree product report

Version Control

January 2025

Download GitHub product report

February 2025

Overview

Atlassian SourceTree is a graphical user interface (GUI) desktop client that facilitates user interaction with Git repositories. SourceTree provides a visual interface that is easy to use and intuitive. It allows developers to save a lot of command lines when working with Git.

The tool is free and works as a Git client for Windows and Mac OS. You can visualize and manage your repositories via the simple GUI. The client offers an efficient and consistent development process for Git and Mercurial.

Atlassian SourceTree Key Features

Branch management: Typically, managing branches is a time-consuming and tedious process for project managers and developers. With SourceTree, you can switch working copies with a single click. You can also see where you are compared with the version in the repository, alerting you to push or pull.
Working copy: Developers who work using the command line often lack visibility. Access the “working copy” section to see the difference between your local copy and the version in the Git repository. This feature allows you to see exactly what has changed.
Branch history: the History section displays the full history of the branch, displaying each commit and file change. This feature enables smooth version control.
GitFlow: GitFlow organizes the workflow, streamlining parallel code changes and reducing merge conflicts.

Atlassian SourceTree Benefits

Any level user can use SourceTree: beginners and experts benefit from the visibility and streamlined workflows of SourceTree. Beginners benefit from the simplified version control. Experts can review changesets and stash and pick between branches. Senior programmers can customize changeset and stashes, apply patches, rebase or shelve changesets. The tool offers detailed tutorials to help beginners and experts start quickly. Other benefits for beginners include easy access to commands with one click and simplified distributed version control.
Code visibility: the visualization of the Git process enables users to manage large projects with multiple branches and commits. SourceTree automatically tracks the activity of your code. It also features bookmarks where you can see a summarized view of all projects and repositories. Therefore, you can check a specific branch or commit with a single click. Finally, it features detailed branching diagrams that make it easy to follow the process.
Git and Hg support: the fully-featured GUI supports Git and Mercurial, offering a consistent development process from the start. You can also use SourceTree for a project on Github. Start by creating the project on Github, then connect it to the SourceTree software.
Free: the SourceTree tool is free to use, even for commercial uses, without buying a license.
Supports Git LFS: users can track large assets and submit code from a single dashboard.
Subordinated modules: you can use submodules for hand-picked dependencies and manage and group projects.

Atlassian SourceTree Use Cases

Check-in and check-out code using the client-side application.
You can also use SourceTree to repair broken Git repositories because you can easily detect mistakes at a glance.
The simple and intuitive user interface allows users to search for and clone remote repositories.

Reviews from Real Users

A Program Manager/Engineer at a government says, "The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge… This product has helped because we have been able to fix problems when our code repository breaks."

Atlassian

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent