GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are two robust source code management platforms. GitHub's collaborative features and extensive integration options give it an edge in team environments.
Features: GitHub features include pull requests, code review abilities, and a wide range of integrations with third-party tools. AWS CodeCommit offers seamless integration with other AWS services, strong security features, and an AWS-centric workflow.
Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve permission management, enhance performance for large repositories, and offer better support for enterprise environments. AWS CodeCommit needs better documentation, improved user training, and enhancements in the notification system.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub offers a user-friendly deployment process and responsive customer support. AWS CodeCommit is easier to deploy within the AWS suite but can have complexities; customer service experiences vary.
Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides competitive pricing and good ROI, especially for teams using its collaborative features. AWS CodeCommit has favorable pricing within the AWS environment but mixed feedback on value for money.
The support from Amazon is efficient and very helpful.
The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
There is a general forum for questions and answers yet no direct support for unpaid users.
CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes.
When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.
One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.
AWS CodeCommit is relatively cheap.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing is average.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only.
There are no issues with security or compliance, and it scales easily.
GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation.
I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.