AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in code repository management. GitHub has an edge due to its expansive community and integrations, whereas AWS CodeCommit is favored by enterprises using AWS services for its security features.

Features: GitHub provides robust integrations with collaborative tools, a wide community engagement platform, and strong support for open-source projects. It includes Git Hooks and SSH keys. AWS CodeCommit offers robust security, seamless AWS service integration, and supports diverse repositories. Its source code management is highly valued, facilitating automation and collaboration for coding tasks.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve in terms of enterprise-grade security features to match AWS's level. Enhancements in native AWS service integration could also be beneficial. AWS CodeCommit can enhance third-party integrations and expand its community engagement to foster collaboration. Simplifying the interface for non-AWS users could further benefit the platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides a straightforward deployment process aided by extensive online resources that streamline onboarding. AWS CodeCommit's integration within the AWS infrastructure offers a smooth deployment experience for those familiar with AWS, though it requires some AWS knowledge.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers, including a free option for open-source projects, which maximizes ROI for community-driven efforts. AWS CodeCommit, on the other hand, uses a pay-as-you-go model allowing for cost-effective scalability, making it advantageous for enterprises deeply connected with AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 6.7%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."

"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."

"The technical support of the solution is good, and our company has used it for GitHub upgrades."

"The solution is scalable."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"GitHub's version control is valuable."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 77% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub