AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

1,802 Views
834 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in the version control platform category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive community support and seamless integration with various CI/CD services, making it preferable for collaborative projects.

Features: GitHub offers extensive integrations with CI/CD services, a strong community focus, and a vast repository of tools. AWS CodeCommit's features include seamless integration with AWS services, secure environments, and support for Git tools and workflows.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance security measures for private repositories, improve integration with non-Microsoft services, and offer more robust native project management tools. AWS CodeCommit might improve by expanding its community support, providing better UI navigation, and offering enhanced documentation for non-AWS integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides straightforward deployment with extensive documentation and community resources. Its customer service is responsive. AWS CodeCommit benefits from AWS's overall deployment efficiency and strong enterprise-oriented support, particularly beneficial for AWS-centric businesses.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers suitable for individuals and enterprises, providing significant ROI through collaboration capabilities. AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, especially for those leveraging existing AWS resources, with a competitive pay-as-you-go model.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 6.3%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.0%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"There are no issues. It's simple, easy, and fully compatible from my perspective with Git."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."

"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"Could be more user friendly."

"The storage for this solution could be improved."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 76% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

AWS CodeCommit

May 2025

Download GitHub product report

April 2025

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent