AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,181 Views
976 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in code repository management. GitHub has an edge due to its expansive community and integrations, whereas AWS CodeCommit is favored by enterprises using AWS services for its security features.

Features: GitHub provides robust integrations with collaborative tools, a wide community engagement platform, and strong support for open-source projects. It includes Git Hooks and SSH keys. AWS CodeCommit offers robust security, seamless AWS service integration, and supports diverse repositories. Its source code management is highly valued, facilitating automation and collaboration for coding tasks.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve in terms of enterprise-grade security features to match AWS's level. Enhancements in native AWS service integration could also be beneficial. AWS CodeCommit can enhance third-party integrations and expand its community engagement to foster collaboration. Simplifying the interface for non-AWS users could further benefit the platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides a straightforward deployment process aided by extensive online resources that streamline onboarding. AWS CodeCommit's integration within the AWS infrastructure offers a smooth deployment experience for those familiar with AWS, though it requires some AWS knowledge.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers, including a free option for open-source projects, which maximizes ROI for community-driven efforts. AWS CodeCommit, on the other hand, uses a pay-as-you-go model allowing for cost-effective scalability, making it advantageous for enterprises deeply connected with AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 841,004 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 7.0%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.6%, down from 7.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The solution is quite scalable."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The solution can scale."

"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."

"If you want to share documents, you can create articles and diagrams with GitHub and share."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

"There is a bit of a learning curve."

"There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished."

"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."

"The merging features can be improved."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

841,004 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 77% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

AWS CodeCommit

March 2025

Download GitHub product report

February 2025

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent