AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 94 GitHub reviews

3,809 Views
1,524 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 13, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit compete in the version control and collaboration category. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its strong open-source community support and superior features like project boards and GitHub Actions.

Features: GitHub brings a stronger open-source community, project boards, and GitHub Actions that support DevOps integration and automation. AWS CodeCommit offers tight integration with AWS services, IAM-based access control, and seamless integration with AWS tools, making it ideal for AWS-centric workflows.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve its security features, refine its support for large files, and offer a friendlier interface for newcomers. AWS CodeCommit would benefit from expanding its feature set, improving documentation, and enabling better integration with third-party tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides robust community support and is mostly used in public cloud environments. AWS CodeCommit is also public cloud-based but requires significant interaction with AWS support. Both offer satisfactory customer service with varying reliance on community and official support teams.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers a free tier with unlimited public repositories, appealing to open-source projects, but its enterprise pricing is viewed as costly. AWS CodeCommit presents a cost-effective model with free initial users and charges based on storage, presenting strong ROI for AWS-focused businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: July 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 5.6%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.9%, up from 6.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The customer service is pretty good."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"The solution is scalable."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"The ease of the planning board feature in GitHub is very valuable."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."

"Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"Github needs more storage."

"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."

"GitHub needs to improve its UI."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is actually one of the cost-effective AWS services. It follows a straightforward pricing model where you pay for users and storage. With around 40 to 50 developers, it ranges from $1...

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab. Simple things...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I am not aware about the pricing, so I will not be able to give feedback.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area. We have used GitHub mainly for the code generation part. That is the only...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 72% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Core Application Security vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub