AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,500 Views
1,099 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in code repository management. GitHub has an edge due to its expansive community and integrations, whereas AWS CodeCommit is favored by enterprises using AWS services for its security features.

Features: GitHub provides robust integrations with collaborative tools, a wide community engagement platform, and strong support for open-source projects. It includes Git Hooks and SSH keys. AWS CodeCommit offers robust security, seamless AWS service integration, and supports diverse repositories. Its source code management is highly valued, facilitating automation and collaboration for coding tasks.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve in terms of enterprise-grade security features to match AWS's level. Enhancements in native AWS service integration could also be beneficial. AWS CodeCommit can enhance third-party integrations and expand its community engagement to foster collaboration. Simplifying the interface for non-AWS users could further benefit the platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides a straightforward deployment process aided by extensive online resources that streamline onboarding. AWS CodeCommit's integration within the AWS infrastructure offers a smooth deployment experience for those familiar with AWS, though it requires some AWS knowledge.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers, including a free option for open-source projects, which maximizes ROI for community-driven efforts. AWS CodeCommit, on the other hand, uses a pay-as-you-go model allowing for cost-effective scalability, making it advantageous for enterprises deeply connected with AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: January 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 7.2%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."

"The solution is scalable."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"GitHub is very straightforward. I really appreciate the versioning capabilities, ease of use, and the ability to host code."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

"You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests."

"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."

"It would be good if there were training materials for junior developers."

"GitHub could add some more security features."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"Could be more user friendly."

"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 73% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 4% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 6% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Version Control

December 2024

Download GitHub product report

January 2025

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent