Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS CodeCommit's customer service is efficient and highly praised for fast responses, effectiveness, and meeting user expectations.
Sentiment score
6.5
GitHub's support is satisfactory, with valued community aid, though response times can be slower for unpaid accounts.
The support from Amazon is efficient and very helpful.
The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent.
Some forums help you get answers faster since you just type in your concern and see resolutions from other engineers.
The technical support from GitHub is generally good, and they communicate effectively.
There is a general forum for questions and answers yet no direct support for unpaid users.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.6
AWS CodeCommit users seek improved features, documentation, and user-friendliness compared to alternatives like Bitbucket, GitHub, and GitLab.
Sentiment score
6.1
GitHub needs improved integrations, better UI, enhanced AI functionalities, automation, security, and better handling of synchronization and large files.
CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes.
When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict.
One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools.
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS CodeCommit is highly scalable and cost-effective, providing seamless usage and unlimited access, competing well with Bitbucket and GitLab.
Sentiment score
8.0
GitHub is praised for its scalability, efficiently managing projects for organizations of all sizes without performance issues.
We have never had a problem with scalability, so I would rate it at least eight to nine.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.5
AWS CodeCommit is cost-effective, with storage-based pricing, sometimes free, and competitively priced compared to similar tools.
Sentiment score
6.4
Enterprise users find GitHub pricing reasonable, but struggle with user-based licenses and appreciate educational and small business support.
AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.
AWS CodeCommit is relatively cheap.
The pricing of GitHub is reasonable, with the cost being around seven dollars per user per month for private repositories.
Normally, GitHub is not expensive, but it would be welcome if it reduces costs for developing countries.
The pricing is average.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
AWS CodeCommit is praised for its stability, reliability, and security, consistently delivering dependable performance without stability issues.
Sentiment score
8.9
GitHub is widely praised for its high stability and reliability, with minor outages being infrequent and brief.
If a skilled developer uses it, it is ten out of ten for stability.
It provides a reliable environment for code management.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
AWS CodeCommit provides secure version control with AWS integration, easy scalability, and supports platform integration for customizable solutions.
Sentiment score
8.4
GitHub offers robust features for collaboration, automation, and integration, aiding efficient remote work and reducing delivery times and costs.
The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only.
There are no issues with security or compliance, and it scales easily.
GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation.
I like how I can create different builds from different branches, which helps me as a QA to test certain features separately from the main application.
GitHub Actions allow for creating multiple jobs that run in different stages such as build, test, and deploy, which enable better visibility and control over the deployment pipeline.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
GitHub
Ranking in Version Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 7.3%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Priyam Vaidya - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides versioning and helps push code onto the production environment
Anyone can use the solution because AWS's documentation is very nice. Even if you know nothing about AWS CodeCommit, you can follow the documentation. We wanted something that could be pushed directly to the testing environment first and then to the production environment. I suggested that a CI/CD pipeline with CodeCommit would benefit this case because it can integrate with various development environments. I would recommend AWS CodeCommit if the requirement is CI/CD. It integrates well with the development environment and makes pushing and regulating the code easy. I will definitely use AWS CodeCommit in CI/CD processes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
AjayKrishna - PeerSpot reviewer
Reduces project delivery times and costs
I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
8%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.
What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?
Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
What do you like most about GitHub?
The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?
I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.
What needs improvement with GitHub?
I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

CodeCommit
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.