AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

GitHub and AWS CodeCommit are competing in code repository management. GitHub has an edge due to its expansive community and integrations, whereas AWS CodeCommit is favored by enterprises using AWS services for its security features.

Features: GitHub provides robust integrations with collaborative tools, a wide community engagement platform, and strong support for open-source projects. It includes Git Hooks and SSH keys. AWS CodeCommit offers robust security, seamless AWS service integration, and supports diverse repositories. Its source code management is highly valued, facilitating automation and collaboration for coding tasks.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve in terms of enterprise-grade security features to match AWS's level. Enhancements in native AWS service integration could also be beneficial. AWS CodeCommit can enhance third-party integrations and expand its community engagement to foster collaboration. Simplifying the interface for non-AWS users could further benefit the platform.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub provides a straightforward deployment process aided by extensive online resources that streamline onboarding. AWS CodeCommit's integration within the AWS infrastructure offers a smooth deployment experience for those familiar with AWS, though it requires some AWS knowledge.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers various pricing tiers, including a free option for open-source projects, which maximizes ROI for community-driven efforts. AWS CodeCommit, on the other hand, uses a pay-as-you-go model allowing for cost-effective scalability, making it advantageous for enterprises deeply connected with AWS services.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 6.7%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Munisaiteja Narravula

AWS Engineer at 6thgen

Efficient integration of code changes with seamless private repository management

AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly. It doesn't require any complex authentication, which makes the process seamless. Deployments happen in a straightforward manner once the code is organized correctly in the repository. The platform allows the creation of private repositories, securing and restricting access to our team members only. This ensures that unauthorized users cannot access sensitive files. AWS CodeCommit also integrates well when we use it with Check Point allowing us to implement information in the criteria we need.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"The solution scalable."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."

"The customer service is pretty good."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

"The solution can scale."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."

More AWS CodeCommit cons

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira."

"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

"The product must document the CI/CD process more."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"GitHub should work on enhancing its search capability. The tool should add some more features and functionalities."

"There could be some improvements related to the automation of certain processes, especially with the integration of artificial intelligence."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The solution is expensive."

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

Lately, it is turning out to be a little expensive. The market is preferring Azure because it offers resources at a much cheaper price. Compared to Azure, AWS is more expensive, and that's the trend.

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics. A built-in dashboard with advanced analytics, like commit frequencies and pull request trends, could be added. These features would help gain dee...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Comparisons

Compared 77% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

AWS CodeCommit

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

No data available

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

AWS CodeCommit vs. GitHub