What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I have not paid for GitHub as I use the free version for personal projects. Organizations may take separate servers from GitHub based on their needs, yet I am unaware of the pricing details.

I do not know about the pricing because I do not pay anything. It's free for me.

We moved to GitHub as it supports us for free. We are a tech-for-good organization.

Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub.

GitHub is a cost-effective solution.

There are several licensing models available for the product. The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support.

We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you buy extra support, you pay an additional cost.

The product is reasonably priced.

We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper.

We must pay the licensing fee if we want to use the tool commercially.

You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version. It gives you all the possible features it has.

It’s an open-source solution. We do not have to pay for it.

Price is free.

I don't know about the solution's cost. My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features.

I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays.

GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on. If you purchase a license, there's an option to make your code private, and our organization has a license.

We are currently paying nothing for GitHub.

I have no visibility in relation to what the costs are surrounding this product.

The solution is open-source and free to use.

I can’t speak to the exact cost of the solution.

The licensing model from GitHub is very clear.

The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable.

I don't handle the licensing. I'm not sure how it works or how much it costs.

I don't deal with licensing. I cannot speak to the exact pricing.

The licensing offered is on an annual basis.

If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub.

We pay an annual license fee.

It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub.

I personally use the free version. the company has the enterprise version of the solution. I'm not a part of the licensing process internally and therefore do not have details in regards to how much the company pays to use the enterprise version,

The licensing model that they have is annoying. One of the things that we struggle all the time with is people that have left the team or the group. We have lots of application teams that are using GitHub. People are moving constantly between organizations, they're moving to different teams, they're moving out of development. There's really not an easy way to track who's still using licenses. If they've vacated the position unless somebody goes back into the active directory and actually removes them from the group, they're still holding onto a seat and we're still trying to figure out, how to manage this so that their seat automatically gets reclaimed when people are moving around and it's not a very straightforward process. It takes a lot of effort on our part to try and keep the inventory seats available and managed properly.

The private repositories are free, which is very good.

There is no cost to use this solution.