What advice do you have for others considering GitHub?

I recommend GitHub to those starting in the software development field. It is essential to explore its features, such as repository creation, pull requests, and code management tasks. GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

Users can trust GitHub as a secure place to store their business code because many large organizations use it. It provides a reliable centralized location for maintaining repositories, and its maturity and research make it a best-in-class option. I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.

GitHub's simplicity is valuable, but there are some limitations in fields and configurations that could be improved. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

There are options like GitLab with more functions and features for very large-scale businesses that spend a lot of money. I'd give GitHub a nine out of ten as a product and would definitely recommend it to other users.

GitHub's branch protection feature is effective in our workflow management. I work with the cloud version of GitHub. The documentation is enough to resolve issues with the solution. People working with Microsoft tech can use GitHub. Microsoft is investing heavily in this tool. Using GitHub depends on users' use cases and their technologies. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Speaking about a functionality of the product that was helpful, I would say that the product offers the capability of testing pipelines, but I don't exactly know what it did. I just knew that we use the testing pipeline feature in projects. The tool offers continuous testing, continuous development, and continuous deployment options that are useful in big projects. Speaking about how the solution supported our team's collaboration across different locations, I would say that it helped my company with the fat git repository or code repository and also the repository of APIs. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. GitHub is just one of the standard working tools for collaboration in the area of software development. The product works well for developing environments by developers. The product was able to streamline some of the development processes in our company and also helped to increase the efficiency of the users, especially when compared to the old systems like Sentinel. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

The solution's deployment and maintenance is very straightforward. It does not take many people to deploy the solution. The planning part is very important. If you are planning for a big team, you have to plan very well. Planning the initial architecture is very important, and it can be done by an architecture team of one to five people. GitHub is far better than other products because it has a very good backend team. Since we use a cloud version, it helps support our team's collaboration across different locations. An organization that has a lot of documentation should utilize GitHub. Otherwise, they will lose their data. GitHub is the main product in any software development organization. AI is only for data, but processing the data from AI needs to be stored somewhere. AI requires collaborating with other tools like GitHub, a repository tool. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

I used GitHub in my previous organization. In my current organization, we mostly use Azure. GitHub is easy to use and easy to manage. It's good for integration and for multi-worker projects. It is robust. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I will recommend the tool to others. If someone is looking for a repository backup solution, they can use GitHub. It helps with task management. It is helpful in AI development projects. It is a valuable product. It does justice to the price. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

The solution is deployed on the cloud in our organization. I would recommend the solution to other users. GitHub is a version control, and you can always switch and text because every version is saved. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

I do not use any pipelines or other tools. I do not use the tool frequently. I mostly develop things on my computer and hand them over to the customers. People must start using the product. It is easy for users who have experience with other Git tools like GitLab or GitBucket. We just have to create a project and clone it. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

I would rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.

GitHub is deployed on the cloud in our organization. Users who have to manage their code can create a GitHub account and start using it. Overall, I rate GitHub ten out of ten.

I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

I rate the product a seven out of ten.

It is way better than developing software by yourself. I would definitely recommend using the solution. Overall, I would rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I am using the solution, and I am fine with it. I would definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.

My advice would be to take some time to clean up your repository and organize your data, step by step, in order to optimize its performance and make it more user-friendly. It can be challenging to work with applications like this when there is a lack of resources or input. However, by investing time in making your repository more efficient, you can reduce the potential for overwhelm and streamline your workflow. I rate GitHub a seven out of ten.

I rate GitHub 10 out of 10. I only use it for storage, so I don't have any problems with it. If you're looking for storing files and code, GitHub is the best and most secure solution.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten. Compared to the competition, I would say GitHub is the best, as it has the most robust security, and most of the developer community is familiar with it. Bitbucket is also an excellent solution with solid security, but more developers would require training.

If you are working in development I would recommend using GitHub. I would rate GitHub a ten out of ten.

I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I rate this solution eight out of 10.

I would recommend the solution to other users and organizations. We have been quite satisfied with its capabilities. I'd rate it eight out of ten.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten.

I’m a customer and end-user. I’d rate the solution eight out of ten.

I recommend this solution to others. There may be some customers that are very picky about not having code on the cloud, and then my recommendation would normally be to use Microsoft Azure Repos, which is essentially a clone of GitHub but it stays within your subscription and within your tenancy on Microsoft Azure. I rate GitHub a nine out of ten.

I would recommend the solution to others. It is very good. I rate GitHub a nine out of ten.

I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.

I'd recommend the solution to others. I'd rate it, overall, at an eight out of ten.

I would give GitHub a nine out of ten overall.

I'm just a customer and an end-user. We currently work with the latest updates of the product. I'm a developer and I don't work with managing everything on GitHub. I just use it for putting in the code and merging branches. GitHub actually is a pretty easy tool. It is not very difficult to understand. It is very easy. Everyone can set up branches there or work on it. I'd rate it eight out of ten. If we could recover branches, I'd give it a perfect ten.

I would rate this solution 8 out of 10.

I rate GitHub nine out of 10 for overall ease of use and completeness in functionality.

I would advise trying out the Advanced Security model, which is its best functionality. I would rate it a 10 out of 10.

I would rate this solution 7 out of 10. If someone is managing the product as well as doing the test management, they should go with GitHub. It's very easy to understand and track everything, and you can even see the different check-ins. If someone is specifically going for a test management tool and they need the proper agile-based tools, they should go for Jira.

This is definitely the best solution I have tried so far. That said, I believe it has some space to improve. It's important to do some homework before implementation and I would suggest using the documentation posted on GitHub. I rate this solution an eight out of 10.

Our initial deployment was with Cloud One. The cPanel is the browser involved. We make use of WordPress. GitHub is the perfect tool for use at present and is extremely necessary. It is one of the best solutions out there. Apart from GitHub, you need to use the local Git version control system since it involves code on a cloud platform. Git version is very helpful. One could download the large types of codes to do on the core level so that there will not be a need to go to the cloud setup every time. The code commands can be run from the local system. Setup and migration can be done with ease. The person would set up the order and the view. In my experience, GitHub is very easy to operate. I rate GitHub as a perfect ten out of ten. I previously used different tools. At present, I am utilizing GitHub and providing assistance with cell phone numbers. The solution allows me to make workspaces and perform changes with ease. It also allows for easy monitoring. I receive updates from Slack for confirmation purposes. There is no need to wait on my developers, as a connection can be made with the production server.

If you are a startup or have a small team, it is a good platform to start with because you can achieve your business goal without any cost. It provides a lot of flexibility, and you can structure yourself for any kind of product development. I would rate GitHub a nine out of ten.

We are just customers and end-users. We are using the latest version of the solution. We have some internal solutions deployed. We have our own private server, a GitHub server, and it always is properly maintained and always updated with the latest version for better performance. I would recommend the solution, however, I would suggest those who intend to use it get the proper training on it first. I would rate the solution at a nine out of ten.

We aren't partners. We are simply customers and end-users. We are still on the previous version. We are still waiting for more stability from the latest version before we update everything. It's a great product. That said, it needs some work still to be able to do everything that GitLab can do, for example. I'm not sure what the future plans are for GitHub. I know they're working on adding a lot of capabilities now that they're part of Microsoft. They're probably going to make it a much more robust solution - not just a version control system. My perspective is as an enterprise on-prem user. I don't know from an open-source community standpoint, how they feel about the changes. I'm sure most of the users are pretty happy with it as a hosting platform. However, my need is specific to my organizational uses. I'd rate the solution at a seven out of ten.

My recommendation for anyone thinking about GitHub is that it is the best solution - except for the price. On a scale of one to ten, I would give GitHub a nine.

GitHub is definitely a platform that I recommend people use. I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.

I would recommend this solution to organizations that are looking for a platform to manage source code. I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

This is a good solution, but it really needs support for CICD. I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.