Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

AWS CodeCommit is easier to use than Bitbucket, requiring only an AWS account password and username.
AWS CodeCommit offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness.
Versioning is the most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit.
AWS CodeCommit integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews.
Customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent.

CONS

AWS CodeCommit lacks certain features available in Bitbucket, such as code reviewers and repository forking.
Jira offers a debugging option not present in AWS CodeCommit.
Details about AWS CodeCommit pricing are limited compared to Bitbucket, which provides detailed pricing features.
AWS CodeCommit could improve in handling mass changes effectively.
Compared to GitHub and GitLab, AWS CodeCommit has a smaller file size cap, limiting large file comparisons.
 

AWS CodeCommit Pros review quotes

Ambresh Lingadhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2023
AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username.
CT
Jan 28, 2025
The solution scalable.
reviewer1775037 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2025
The customer service is pretty good.
Learn what your peers think about AWS CodeCommit. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Anshuman Sen - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews.
Agron Demiraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 24, 2024
The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub.
Munisaiteja Narravula - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 2, 2024
AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly.
George Onalo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up.
Priyam Vaidya - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
The solution's most valuable feature is versioning.
SY
May 13, 2024
It helps us to install our code idea projects.
Varish Ansari - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 31, 2023
AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.
 

AWS CodeCommit Cons review quotes

Ambresh Lingadhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2023
There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.
CT
Jan 28, 2025
There is room for improvement in Insight Analytics.
reviewer1775037 - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 27, 2025
When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide.
Learn what your peers think about AWS CodeCommit. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: February 2025.
838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Agron Demiraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 24, 2024
Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved.
Munisaiteja Narravula - PeerSpot reviewer
Dec 2, 2024
There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements.
George Onalo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
SY
May 13, 2024
The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper.
Varish Ansari - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 31, 2023
The tool should improve its UI.