Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Pros & Cons summary

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.
Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

AWS CodeCommit is easier to use than Bitbucket, requiring only an AWS account password and username.
AWS CodeCommit is simple and cost-effective.
It supports integration with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews.
Versioning is a highly valued feature of AWS CodeCommit.
AWS CodeCommit acts as a code repository with features for code versioning and approval, similar to those on GitHub.

CONS

Some options in Bitbucket are not available in AWS CodeCommit, such as adding a code reviewer.
AWS CodeCommit lacks the ability to fork repositories online, a feature present in Bitbucket.
Jira offers a debugging option not found in AWS CodeCommit.
While AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket, it does not offer as many features.
AWS CodeCommit could benefit from video or documentation for beginners, including detailed pricing information similar to Bitbucket's.
 

AWS CodeCommit Pros review quotes

Ambresh Lingadhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2023
AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username.
Anshuman Sen - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews.
Agron Demiraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 24, 2024
The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Atlassian, GitHub and others in Version Control. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
George Onalo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up.
Priyam Vaidya - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
The solution's most valuable feature is versioning.
SY
May 13, 2024
It helps us to install our code idea projects.
Varish Ansari - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 31, 2023
AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.
 

AWS CodeCommit Cons review quotes

Ambresh Lingadhar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 31, 2023
There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use.
Agron Demiraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 24, 2024
Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved.
George Onalo - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 12, 2024
Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Atlassian, GitHub and others in Version Control. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SY
May 13, 2024
The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper.
Varish Ansari - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 31, 2023
The tool should improve its UI.