Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
8.0
AWS CodeCommit support is highly praised for its fast response, excellent service, and consistently meeting user expectations.
No sentiment score available
The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
6.3
AWS CodeCommit offers a less user-friendly interface than Bitbucket, needing better features and documentation for an improved experience.
No sentiment score available
CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
AWS CodeCommit is highly scalable and flexible, efficiently handling various team sizes and storage needs with competitive pricing.
No sentiment score available
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
7.5
AWS CodeCommit pricing is storage-based, considered reasonable by many, with details available online for effective cost comparison.
No sentiment score available
AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
AWS CodeCommit is praised for its reliable performance, strong security, and high dependability as part of AWS.
No sentiment score available
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.1
AWS CodeCommit is user-friendly, affordable, offers integration with AWS services, robust security, and supports versioning and multiple environments.
No sentiment score available
There are no issues with security or compliance, and it scales easily.
 

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 7.3%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.2%, up from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Priyam Vaidya - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides versioning and helps push code onto the production environment
Anyone can use the solution because AWS's documentation is very nice. Even if you know nothing about AWS CodeCommit, you can follow the documentation. We wanted something that could be pushed directly to the testing environment first and then to the production environment. I suggested that a CI/CD pipeline with CodeCommit would benefit this case because it can integrate with various development environments. I would recommend AWS CodeCommit if the requirement is CI/CD. It integrates well with the development environment and makes pushing and regulating the code easy. I will definitely use AWS CodeCommit in CI/CD processes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Preetham S - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good integration capabilities and is easy to maintain
The features I found to be the most valuable in the product for code collaboration stem from the fact that the tool provides webhooks, which are very beneficial for triggering jobs in Jenkins when dealing with new commits, Git push, and Git merge. Speaking about how the tool's pull request functionality impacted my company's code review process, I would say that when a pull request is created, it goes to the technical team leader and PO. After my company gets comments from the tech lead or PO, the pull request will be merged with the targeted branch. The integration capabilities of the product are good since it can integrate with multiple products. The product is easy to maintain. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors.
What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?
Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved. If someone wants to migrate to CodeCommit or migrate out of it, the process needs to be streamlined. This feature should be added.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects.
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
We use the solution primarily to manage and version our code repositories. It integrates with our continuous integration and continuous deployment (CICD) processes. Specifically, we utilize the pip...
 

Also Known As

CodeCommit
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.