AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket Server comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Atlassian are both solutions in the Version Control category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.1, while Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.3% mindshare in VC, compared to Atlassian’s 28.1% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Atlassian users who would recommend it.

AWS CodeCommit

Read 8 AWS CodeCommit reviews

1,494 Views
1,331 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Read 26 Bitbucket Server reviews

4,267 Views
4,008 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

AWS CodeCommit

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 24, 2024

Bitbucket Server and AWS CodeCommit are competitive products in version control solutions for software development teams. AWS CodeCommit has an edge due to its seamless integration with AWS services and robust security features, though Bitbucket Server is preferred for its ease of use with Atlassian tools.

Features: Bitbucket Server offers powerful Jira integration, customizable workflows, and extensive pull request capabilities for efficient collaboration. AWS CodeCommit is notable for automatic scalability, integrated AWS security measures, and flexible repository management.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server could enhance its user interface and improve native features like CI/CD capabilities. It also requires a more straightforward scaling option for larger teams. AWS CodeCommit could benefit from more intuitive collaboration tools and streamlined integration with non-AWS services. Enhancing version control capabilities to cater to broader user needs would also be advantageous.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server offers versatile deployment, including on-premises options suitable for enterprises with specific security requirements, supported by Atlassian's configuration-focused support. AWS CodeCommit simplifies deployment with a fully managed service, backed by AWS's broad support network, making it easier for AWS-native teams.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server requires upfront investment for on-premises hosting and scales licensing with team size, yielding high ROI with Atlassian tool integration. AWS CodeCommit operates on a pay-as-you-go model, appealing to growing teams with its scalability and cost-efficient AWS infrastructure, potentially offering higher ROI through integration benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

AWS CodeCommit

Ranking in Version Control

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 7.3%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.1%, up from 21.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Priyam Vaidya

AWS Administrator at Vohra Wound Physicians

Provides versioning and helps push code onto the production environment

Anyone can use the solution because AWS's documentation is very nice. Even if you know nothing about AWS CodeCommit, you can follow the documentation. We wanted something that could be pushed directly to the testing environment first and then to the production environment. I suggested that a CI/CD pipeline with CodeCommit would benefit this case because it can integrate with various development environments. I would recommend AWS CodeCommit if the requirement is CI/CD. It integrates well with the development environment and makes pushing and regulating the code easy. I will definitely use AWS CodeCommit in CI/CD processes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."

"The customer service and support for AWS CodeCommit are excellent."

"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"AWS CodeCommit's user interface is nice, and it's easy for people to pick up."

"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."

"AWS CodeCommit is highly user-friendly."

"It helps us to install our code idea projects."

More AWS CodeCommit pros

"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

"Our code is secure."

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."

"Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration."

"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is server management."

More Bitbucket Server pros

Cons

"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."

"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."

"The tool should improve its UI."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"There is room for improvement in how AWS CodeCommit handles mass changes, like Fortran, which is designed to make these alterations in a friendly manner across AWS requirements."

"Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket."

"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects."

"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."

"The product's initial setup phase is complex."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

More Bitbucket Server cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."

"The solution is expensive."

"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is free, and there are no additional charges for using it.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?

Although CodeCommit's user interface is good, it can be improved when compared to other version controls like GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket.

See all answers

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 74% of the time

GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 22% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit

Compared 5% of the time

More AWS CodeCommit Competitors

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 98% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

December 2024

Download AWS CodeCommit product report

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

December 2024

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Also Known As

CodeCommit

Stash

Learn More

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Atlassian

Overview

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

Sample Customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Buyer's Guide

AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

December 2024

Free Report: AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.