Top 10 Bitbucket Server Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

26 reviews
85% willing to recommend

218 followers

Top Bitbucket Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Bitbucket Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitHub, AWS CodeCommit, and IBM Rational ClearCase. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Bitbucket Server surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Jira, providing robust code collaboration tools, and ensuring enterprise-grade security, empowering teams to improve workflow efficiency and maintain high-quality code standards.

Atlassian Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Atlassian, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

GitHub

4.4 out of 5

GitHub

4.4 out of 5

Bitbucket Server and GitHub are popular repository management tools with distinct differences. Users appreciate Bitbucket Server's robust integration capabilities, while GitHub is favored for its comprehensive collaboration features. Despite Bitbucket Server’s security and deployment flexibility, GitHub's larger community and extensive API support make it the more appealing choice for many. In comparison, Bitbucket Server is praised for customizable workflows and Jira integration, while GitHub stands out with a vast plugin marketplace and native support for continuous integration. Bitbucket Server users note that performance can be sluggish with large repositories. In contrast, GitHub users seek enhanced project management functionalities. Bitbucket Server is known for straightforward deployment options and excellent on-premise support, but GitHub offers a seamless cloud deployment experience. Bitbucket Server’s pricing is competitive for small teams, but GitHub’s higher pricing is justified by an extensive feature set.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server's setup cost is competitive with a one-time license fee, while GitHub offers a subscription-based pricing model.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitbucket Server's setup cost is competitive with a one-time license fee, while GitHub offers a subscription-based pricing model.

AWS CodeCommit

4.1 out of 5

AWS CodeCommit

4.1 out of 5

Bitbucket Server's JIRA integration and plugin options suit Atlassian tool users, while AWS CodeCommit integrates with AWS services, enhancing cloud benefits. In comparison, Bitbucket offers on-premises control, whereas AWS CodeCommit provides easy cloud deployment, influencing tech buyers considering infrastructure needs.

Download AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a high initial setup cost, while AWS CodeCommit offers a low barrier to entry with minimal setup expenses. This significant cost difference highlights Bitbucket's enterprise focus versus CodeCommit's accessibility for smaller teams.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Rational ClearCase

3.2 out of 5

IBM Rational ClearCase

3.2 out of 5

IBM Rational ClearCase offers advanced branching, merging, and history tracking. In comparison, Bitbucket Server excels in integration with Atlassian products and collaboration tools. IBM Rational ClearCase requires substantial setup, while Bitbucket Server is more cost-effective with straightforward deployment and better customer service.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report

Pricing

IBM Rational ClearCase has a higher setup cost, while Bitbucket Server offers more affordable setup pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Rational ClearCase has a higher setup cost, while Bitbucket Server offers more affordable setup pricing.

Liquibase

4.3 out of 5

Liquibase

4.3 out of 5

Bitbucket Server offers robust Git repository management and seamless integration with Atlassian products. In comparison, Liquibase specializes in powerful database schema changes and version control, making it ideal for complex database operations. Bitbucket’s ease of deployment contrasts Liquibase’s need for increased accessibility.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a higher setup cost while Liquibase offers a more affordable initial investment. The difference in setup costs is significant between these two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a higher setup cost while Liquibase offers a more affordable initial investment. The difference in setup costs is significant between these two solutions.

Surround SCM

1 out of 5

Surround SCM

1 out of 5

Surround SCM is the source code management tool that seamlessly integrates with Helix ALM, allowing you to work with source code and work items from either application. With the built-in integration between Helix ALM and Surround SCM, you can build and release specific fixes and features instead of just shipping blocks of code.

View comparison

Related categories

Version Control

Application Security Tools

Software Configuration Management