Top 10 Bitbucket Server Alternatives

4.1 out of 5

26 reviews
85% willing to recommend

Top Bitbucket Server Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Bitbucket Server based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include GitHub, Git, and AWS CodeCommit. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Bitbucket Server surpasses its competitors by offering superior Git repository management, enhanced security features, and seamless integration with Jira, providing robust performance and facilitating efficient collaboration for software development teams to streamline their workflow with confidence.

Atlassian Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Atlassian, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

GitHub

4.4 out of 5

GitHub

4.4 out of 5

Bitbucket Server integrates well with Atlassian tools, supporting infrastructure investments without extra costs. In comparison, GitHub enhances cloud-based collaboration, offering robust security and CI/CD features. Bitbucket suits organizations needing strong JIRA ties, while GitHub appeals to those prioritizing global teamwork and open-source development.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a flat setup cost while GitHub can incur higher initial fees due to additional features, highlighting a key difference.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a flat setup cost while GitHub can incur higher initial fees due to additional features, highlighting a key difference.

Git

4.3 out of 5

Git

4.3 out of 5

Bitbucket Server integrates seamlessly with Jira and emphasizes strong permission controls. In comparison, Git's widespread usage and performance efficiency showcase its strengths. Bitbucket Server is noted for robust code review features, while Git stands out for its speed and excellent branching capabilities.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. Git Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server involves a higher setup cost focusing on enterprise-scale features, while Git offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to smaller teams with basic needs.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitbucket Server involves a higher setup cost focusing on enterprise-scale features, while Git offers a more cost-effective setup, catering to smaller teams with basic needs.

AWS CodeCommit

4.0 out of 5

AWS CodeCommit

4.0 out of 5

Bitbucket Server attracts teams wanting detailed on-premises control and Atlassian integration. In comparison, AWS CodeCommit suits businesses needing cloud scalability and AWS ecosystem integration, making it appealing for entities using multiple Amazon services despite higher potential costs.

Download AWS CodeCommit vs. Bitbucket Server Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a higher setup cost due to initial licensing fees, while AWS CodeCommit offers a more budget-friendly option with minimal setup charges.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a higher setup cost due to initial licensing fees, while AWS CodeCommit offers a more budget-friendly option with minimal setup charges.

IBM Rational ClearCase

3.2 out of 5

IBM Rational ClearCase

3.2 out of 5

IBM Rational ClearCase offers advanced branching, merging, and history tracking. In comparison, Bitbucket Server excels in integration with Atlassian products and collaboration tools. IBM Rational ClearCase requires substantial setup, while Bitbucket Server is more cost-effective with straightforward deployment and better customer service.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. IBM Rational ClearCase Report

Pricing

IBM Rational ClearCase has a higher setup cost, while Bitbucket Server offers more affordable setup pricing.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Rational ClearCase has a higher setup cost, while Bitbucket Server offers more affordable setup pricing.

Liquibase

4.3 out of 5

Liquibase

4.3 out of 5

Bitbucket Server offers robust Git repository management and seamless integration with Atlassian products. In comparison, Liquibase specializes in powerful database schema changes and version control, making it ideal for complex database operations. Bitbucket’s ease of deployment contrasts Liquibase’s need for increased accessibility.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase Report

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a higher setup cost while Liquibase offers a more affordable initial investment. The difference in setup costs is significant between these two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Bitbucket Server has a higher setup cost while Liquibase offers a more affordable initial investment. The difference in setup costs is significant between these two solutions.

Helix Core

4.1 out of 5

Helix Core

4.1 out of 5

Helix Core offers competitive pricing and strong customer support. In comparison, Bitbucket Server excels in feature offerings. Helix Core is excellent with large file handling and user permissions. Bitbucket Server stands out for its integration with Atlassian products and powerful code review tools.

Download Bitbucket Server vs. Helix Core Report

Pricing

Helix Core offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Bitbucket Server, which has a higher upfront expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Helix Core offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Bitbucket Server, which has a higher upfront expense.

Related categories

Version Control

Application Security Tools

Software Configuration Management