Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase comparison

Atlassian and Liquibase are both solutions in the Version Control category. Atlassian is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.1, while Liquibase is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. Atlassian holds a 28.2% mindshare in VC, compared to Liquibase’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Atlassian users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquibase users who would recommend it.

Bitbucket Server

Read 25 Bitbucket Server reviews

4,526 Views
4,220 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

Liquibase

Read 3 Liquibase reviews

970 Views
416 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Liquibase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Bitbucket Server and Liquibase are competing tools in their respective fields. Bitbucket Server holds an edge due to its integration with Atlassian products, while Liquibase is strong in database schema change management.

Features: Bitbucket Server integrates smoothly with Atlassian tools, promotes collaboration, and enhances version control. Liquibase offers robust database schema change management, supports seamless database migrations, and enables effective database versioning.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server needs performance improvements, better permission controls, and enhanced speed. Liquibase requires richer documentation, simplified rollback processes, and improved usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server is easy to deploy for teams already using Atlassian tools and benefits from comprehensive customer support. Liquibase deployment can be complex, and users indicate a need for better support resources.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server offers competitive pricing with a good ROI, especially for Atlassian-integrated teams. Liquibase has higher setup costs but provides solid ROI by enhancing database performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.2%, up from 21.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Preetham S

DevOps Engineer at Merck Group

Offers good integration capabilities and is easy to maintain

The features I found to be the most valuable in the product for code collaboration stem from the fact that the tool provides webhooks, which are very beneficial for triggering jobs in Jenkins when dealing with new commits, Git push, and Git merge. Speaking about how the tool's pull request functionality impacted my company's code review process, I would say that when a pull request is created, it goes to the technical team leader and PO. After my company gets comments from the tech lead or PO, the pull request will be merged with the targeted branch. The integration capabilities of the product are good since it can integrate with multiple products. The product is easy to maintain. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

Sudheer Kumar Jamjam

Technical Lead CloudDevOps Engineer at Deloitte

Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention

I would recommend using it. To learn Liquibase, one should have some database knowledge. If the person is from a DBA background, they would be able to learn quickly. But if they are from an application or infrastructure role, it's medium complex. Before getting started, you should thoroughly go through the documentation and follow the latest changes deployed by the Liquibase product team. Basically, when using the product, you should be able to understand it and stay updated on the latest releases. Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten. Organizations should have this kind of tool to reduce manual intervention. The one point they could improve on is documentation, which they haven't clarified, and they need to work on that a lot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."

"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."

"The product is easy to maintain."

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

Cons

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"The pricing is quite high."

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use the solution primarily to manage and version our code repositories. It integrates with our continuous integration and continuous deployment (CICD) processes. Specifically, we utilize the pip...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Liquibase?

Liquibase is an open-source solution. If you are using Liquibase, you need to update its license. I think Liquibase is affordable for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

I have worked on the Liquibase commands, Liquibase updates, Liquibase storeback, and some basic commands from Liquibase. We were using the Docker image installed from the AWS CI/CD, downloading thi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 98% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 35% of the time

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Liquibase

Compared 26% of the time

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 26% of the time

GitHub vs Liquibase

Compared 13% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server

November 2024

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

November 2024

Download Liquibase product report

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Learn More

Atlassian

Liquibase

Overview

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

Buyer's Guide

Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase

October 2024

Free Report: Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase

Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Bitbucket Server vs. Liquibase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.