Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 36.2%, up from 31.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.0%, up from 22.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Sinthusan Thangarajah - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient history tracking enhances code management with an easy setup
We use Bitbucket as a version control system. Our team consists of many developers, and we utilize Bitbucket to manage our code versioning, develop features, and handle deployments and releases Bitbucket has made code versioning and tracking extremely efficient, which helps in understanding the…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has a nice user experience to review PRs and provides great pipeline features, integrating well with other Atlassian products."
"Bitbucket's most valuable feature is the web interface, which is useful compared to other tools, has a lot of features, and is intuitive."
"The code reviews and the ability to support DevSecOps are very important."
"Bitbucket is definitely a tool to consider if somebody is still on CVS. It is a great tool and well integrated with Bamboo."
"Code check in and code version control."
"The initial setup was straightforward, especially leveraging its cloud platform deployment options."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"The product's most valuable feature is output backup."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."
"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"The platform's most valuable features are the code reviews and the ability to add comments to the code."
"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."
"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."
 

Cons

"Sometimes we struggle with searching on repositories. It is a bit challenging sometimes to pinpoint the code or repositories when just filtering by repositories."
"Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature."
"The installation of Bitbucket on our server was not as easy as other Atlassian products, so it is something that can be improved."
"I think the developers are constantly working on improving the pull requests support."
"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"Bitbucket could improve search and indexing capabilities. There is only basic searching available. There is only the ability to index the main branch but not the subbranches. The search capabilities are dodgy."
"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is a cost-effective solution. It is the cheapest in the market. It is lower than GitLab and GitHub."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because it is cheaper than solutions like GitLab."
"When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
"You have to buy additional licenses when you exceed 50 users."
"The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams."
"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
831,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
51%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
In Bitbucket, manual processes are needed to handle changes between repositories. Automation for this process would be beneficial. We need a script that can automatically integrate specified change...
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,481 professionals have used our research since 2012.