Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 34.9%, up from 33.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 26.8%, up from 24.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Prathamesh DMarathe - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless collaboration and merge conflict resolution improve code management
I use the Bitbucket tool to store the code repository and maintain a CI/CD pipeline, allowing multiple developers to work on different code branches. We can integrate with the developer Marathe bridge branch, enabling it to be pushed into the production environment within the CI/CD.  I use…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features are the scripts used for migration purposes and to create new repository releases."
"Multiple users can work on the same repository using different branches, making it beneficial."
"The product's most valuable feature is output backup."
"The most valuable feature of Bitbucket is its capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use. If I need to check out my latest code or I need to send my local code to the depositories it is simple. Overall it is has been a good experience from my side using this solution."
"Bitbucket is significantly cheaper compared to GitHub and it provides on-premises hosting."
"The tool helps us manage different versions of code and branches. I like that Bitbucket is similar to Git but may have some vendor support. It has many of the same features as Git."
"We can watch the newly implemented code. So it's quite nice to organize the teams to see what part of the work is done and what part of the code is already old or new. It is very good for that kind of management."
"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"It can efficiently promote code to different environments."
"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."
"The platform's most valuable features are the code reviews and the ability to add comments to the code."
"Its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."
 

Cons

"The online documentation isn't sufficient for configuration at an enterprise level. If new issues arise, vendor support may be necessary."
"The module component needs improvement."
"I rate the support from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"I would like to see the security logs option on the tool directly. The current way to work with security logs is through an email protocol."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
"Bitbucket could improve its security. For example, the user access security could improve."
"In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement."
"Currently, what's lacking in Bitbucket is the assignment feature."
"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."
"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"The UI could be enhanced."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."
"I rate the price from Bitbucket a four out of five."
"The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams."
"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."
"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."
"Sometimes there are issues in obtaining licenses and the pricing could be improved."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.