Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket is 33.8%, up from 33.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 25.9%, up from 24.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Prathamesh DMarathe - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamless collaboration and merge conflict resolution improve code management
I use the Bitbucket tool to store the code repository and maintain a CI/CD pipeline, allowing multiple developers to work on different code branches. We can integrate with the developer Marathe bridge branch, enabling it to be pushed into the production environment within the CI/CD.  I use…
Dileep DK - PeerSpot reviewer
Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management
Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool's UI is better."
"It is easy to write code and store it in the central repository."
"The tool helps us manage different versions of code and branches. I like that Bitbucket is similar to Git but may have some vendor support. It has many of the same features as Git."
"Bitbucket lets me create new projects in a few clicks and check out files in a seamless and integrated manner."
"It has a nice user experience to review PRs and provides great pipeline features, integrating well with other Atlassian products."
"The setup was okay, and it was well-integrated."
"The most valuable thing we have found is the workloads are good in Jira and we are able to control the access."
"You can use Bitbucket to whitelist IP addresses during deployment."
"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"It has consistently performed well without major issues, providing a reliable code management and collaboration environment."
"The most valuable feature is that it has its own pipelines."
"Our code is secure."
"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."
"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."
 

Cons

"The online documentation isn't sufficient for configuration at an enterprise level. If new issues arise, vendor support may be necessary."
"The module component needs improvement."
"I rate Bitbucket five out of 10 for affordability. It isn't cheap."
"Bitbucket doesn't currently offer AI functionalities."
"I would like to see the tool's desktop version."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"The scalability could be improved."
"The product could benefit from enhancements in scaling capabilities for continuous deployment processes and better integration with other cloud platforms beyond AWS."
"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."
"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"The product's initial setup phase is complex."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."
"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because it is cheaper than solutions like GitLab."
"The product offers competitive pricing structures for small to medium-sized businesses, which is especially beneficial for smaller teams."
"Bitbucket may be perceived as costly for smaller companies."
"I rate the pricing a seven out of ten because it is expensive."
"When you increase from ten people to anything higher the price increase to one thousand five hundred. That is unsatisfactory and they should have a gradual price slope."
"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"We find that the pricing is very affordable."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
43%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
I am not able to recollect any new suggestions. In terms of the commits, we currently create a pull request, however, we are not able to assign any. This could be an area for improvement.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
While Bitbucket Server performs well, the improvement lies not in the tool itself yet in the discipline of the team using it. The tool does not impose restrictions, allowing for flexibility in work...
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
Bitbucket Server is used for private code management and source code management. It facilitates versioning, allowing us to maintain a master branch which reflects the code in production, and manage...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Bitbucket vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.