Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree
Ranking in Version Control
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket Server
Ranking in Version Control
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 5.6%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.2%, up from 21.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Francisco Castrillo - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows fast and effective management of branches and integration
For me, the branches graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes.
Preetham S - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good integration capabilities and is easy to maintain
The features I found to be the most valuable in the product for code collaboration stem from the fact that the tool provides webhooks, which are very beneficial for triggering jobs in Jenkins when dealing with new commits, Git push, and Git merge. Speaking about how the tool's pull request functionality impacted my company's code review process, I would say that when a pull request is created, it goes to the technical team leader and PO. After my company gets comments from the tech lead or PO, the pull request will be merged with the targeted branch. The integration capabilities of the product are good since it can integrate with multiple products. The product is easy to maintain. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The tool's UI is good."
"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"I believe it's user-friendly for our developers, and it's effective in terms of traceability for tracking our actions."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."
 

Cons

"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"Instead of providing only raw features and plugins, Atlassian should provide a ready-to-use integration of both choices to incorporate "trunk-based" development."
"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."
"The UI could be enhanced."
"If I want to mail someone a master branch, then sometimes it shows some conflict with other codes in the master branch."
"The product interface consists of multiple features that are complicated to navigate for new users."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."
"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
"There is a fee for using SourceTree."
"The solution comes as a part of the suite."
"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."
"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."
"We pay around $6 per user."
"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."
"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."
"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?
I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite.
What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?
There can be improvements in the way the messages are displayed in the tool. The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?
The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects.
What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?
We use the solution primarily to manage and version our code repositories. It integrates with our continuous integration and continuous deployment (CICD) processes. Specifically, we utilize the pip...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Stash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket Server and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.