Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree
Ranking in Version Control
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitbucket
Ranking in Version Control
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 5.1%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitbucket is 36.2%, up from 31.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Francisco Castrillo - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows fast and effective management of branches and integration
For me, the branches graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes.
Sinthusan Thangarajah - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient history tracking enhances code management with an easy setup
We use Bitbucket as a version control system. Our team consists of many developers, and we utilize Bitbucket to manage our code versioning, develop features, and handle deployments and releases Bitbucket has made code versioning and tracking extremely efficient, which helps in understanding the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"The tool's UI is good."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"We have a couple of different tools that allow us to tie source code changes to report bugs. It's integrated with a bug tracking system and also integrated with what requires a tracking system. So we have better facilities. We get with the command line and can type all that stuff in and get the same kind of trust, but when we d it all manually, it's not likely to happen."
"The tool's UI is better."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The initial setup was straightforward, especially leveraging its cloud platform deployment options."
"It allows me to track the code from ten years back, which is incredibly useful when trying to understand certain implementations in a project."
"Its key strength lies in securing and centralizing code repositories."
"It has a nice user experience to review PRs and provides great pipeline features, integrating well with other Atlassian products."
"This is a very dependable product that is easy to use and it has an excellent GUI interface."
 

Cons

"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The tool offers a limited pipeline structure."
"There could be more AI features included in the product."
"The scalability could be improved."
"It goes well with other Atlassian solutions like Jira or Bamboo, but integration with other third-party solutions is more complex."
"Could provide some default branching options for users to adopt."
"I think the configuration can be improved because it is getting more complicated and not very well organized."
"The scalability for the cloud version can be improved."
"Bitbucket can improve by integrating a tool to manage conflict code. This would save time."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
"There is a fee for using SourceTree."
"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."
"A full licensing cost is paid for Bitbucket."
"Licensing is on a monthly basis, it's available on our website. They have a free version, the pro version and then they have an enterprise version, and we're using a kind of the middle of the pro version for about $7 per user per month."
"With our small number of users, our licensing fees are approximately $10 USD per month."
"When it comes to licensing we have the standard plan."
"I rate Bitbucket's pricing a five out of ten."
"I rate the pricing an eight out of ten because it is cheaper than solutions like GitLab."
"We have approximately 40 licenses for Bitbucket."
"Bitbucket is a low-priced tool."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
University
8%
Educational Organization
51%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?
I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite.
What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?
There can be improvements in the way the messages are displayed in the tool. The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done.
What do you like most about Bitbucket?
It's straightforward to adapt to, with user-friendly features and a convenient UI.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitbucket?
Pricing is not based on low cost. It's based on the quality and satisfaction of the services provided. We are not comparing Bitbucket's pricing with GitLab.
What needs improvement with Bitbucket?
In Bitbucket, manual processes are needed to handle changes between repositories. Automation for this process would be beneficial. We need a script that can automatically integrate specified change...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
Oscar Insurance, Fugro Roames, Splunk, Rakuten, Red Giant, Met Office, Trulia, Onfido, TriNet, Orbitz Worldwide, Ames Research Center, Sotheby's
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian SourceTree vs. Bitbucket and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.