Bitbucket Server vs GitHub comparison

Read 88 GitHub reviews

3,119 Views
1,265 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Bitbucket Server and GitHub are popular version control systems. While both have their strengths, GitHub's extensive feature set and ease of use give it an edge based on user reviews.

Features: Bitbucket Server is valued for its Jira integration, powerful branching capabilities, and strong support system. GitHub receives praise for its extensive integrations, collaborative features, and large community support.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server users wish for a more user-friendly experience, enhanced performance, and improvements in scalability. GitHub users frequently mention the need for better project management tools, more competitive pricing, and enhancements in security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server is noted for its flexibility in deployment options, including on-premise installations, and reliable customer support. GitHub is commended for its straightforward cloud deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server is considered cost-effective, with reasonable setup costs and satisfactory ROI. Users feel that despite GitHub's higher cost, its robust features and seamless integrations justify the investment, leading to better overall ROI perceptions.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub Report (Updated: October 2024).

Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.2%, up from 21.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.5%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Preetham S

DevOps Engineer at Merck Group

Apr 22, 2024

Offers good integration capabilities and is easy to maintain

The features I found to be the most valuable in the product for code collaboration stem from the fact that the tool provides webhooks, which are very beneficial for triggering jobs in Jenkins when dealing with new commits, Git push, and Git merge. Speaking about how the tool's pull request functionality impacted my company's code review process, I would say that when a pull request is created, it goes to the technical team leader and PO. After my company gets comments from the tech lead or PO, the pull request will be merged with the targeted branch. The integration capabilities of the product are good since it can integrate with multiple products. The product is easy to maintain. I recommend the product to others who plan to use it. I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 11, 2024

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to maintain."

"The product’s most valuable features are private repositories and the ability to work as a proxy for implementing CI/CD pipelines."

"Bitbucket Server integrates well with other products."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

"Its standout features are the seamless integration with various intelligent tools and its user-friendly nature."

"It is an easily scalable solution."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"We can make a private repository."

"The learning curve is small."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"The technical support of the solution is good, and our company has used it for GitHub upgrades."

"The solution can scale."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are really interested in how they organize the history of the code itself which is good."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects."

"The platform's integration with other cloud services should be improved."

"The product requires patching and version improvements. Some functions do not work properly when we move from one version to another. We need a technical improvement. Also, communicating with other Atlassian products becomes cumbersome when we move from one version to another. I want Bitbucket Server to include a dashboard similar to Jira's. Atlassian must also develop a tool to scan our complete base for vulnerabilities."

"The UI could be enhanced."

"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."

"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."

"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."

"Currently, the interface could benefit from a more sophisticated code viewing option."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"There could be more integration into Azure."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"Bitbucket Server is quite expensive compared to other products."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user185772

Senior Software Architect with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 27, 2015

GitHub vs. GitLab vs. BitBucket Server (Formerly Stash)

Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/10/16/github-vs-gitlabs-vs-bitbucket-server-formerly-stash/ This article will try to compare GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket Server (previously called Stash) installed on your own servers. Similar comparison of cloud offerings is outside…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects.

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use the solution primarily to manage and version our code repositories. It integrates with our continuous integration and continuous deployment (CICD) processes. Specifically, we utilize the pip...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I have not paid for GitHub as I use the free version for personal projects. Organizations may take separate servers from GitHub based on their needs, yet I am unaware of the pricing details.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code. Introducing a feature to manage and resolve conflicts directly within the application rather than ...

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 97% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 3% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Bitbucket Server

November 2024

Download GitHub product report

November 2024

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Learn More

Atlassian

Overview

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent