Bitbucket Server vs GitHub comparison

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,722 Views
1,162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Bitbucket Server

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Bitbucket Server and GitHub are popular version control systems. While both have their strengths, GitHub's extensive feature set and ease of use give it an edge based on user reviews.

Features: Bitbucket Server is valued for its Jira integration, powerful branching capabilities, and strong support system. GitHub receives praise for its extensive integrations, collaborative features, and large community support.

Room for Improvement: Bitbucket Server users wish for a more user-friendly experience, enhanced performance, and improvements in scalability. GitHub users frequently mention the need for better project management tools, more competitive pricing, and enhancements in security features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Bitbucket Server is noted for its flexibility in deployment options, including on-premise installations, and reliable customer support. GitHub is commended for its straightforward cloud deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Bitbucket Server is considered cost-effective, with reasonable setup costs and satisfactory ROI. Users feel that despite GitHub's higher cost, its robust features and seamless integrations justify the investment, leading to better overall ROI perceptions.

To learn more, read our detailed Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2024).

Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 823,875 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Bitbucket Server

Ranking in Version Control

2nd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Bitbucket Server is 28.1%, up from 21.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Dileep DK

Head of Engineering - Consumer Finance at DBS Bank

Facilitates efficient branching and integration with flexible workflow management

Bitbucket Server excels as a versioning system, effectively managing branching and code integration. It provides flexibility, allowing teams to customize workflows according to their specific needs. We maintain a master branch for production and separate branches for different features, which makes it easier to manage code changes. Additionally, its integration with Jenkins pipelines for automating builds and performing various checks enhances its utility.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes half an hour to deploy."

"In terms of benefits, I feel that many companies are moving to Bitbucket Server since it can be deployed on an on-premises model at a time when everything is being moved to the cloud."

"The most valuable feature of the Bitbucket Server is its ease of management. The solution is easy to manage once we migrate and set up the data. The solution offers a fast code push feature."

"Integration of Bitbucket with JIRA & Bamboo is well done by Atlassian."

"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."

"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."

"Our code is secure."

"It is an amazingly stable solution."

More Bitbucket Server pros

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"I like the CI/CD features."

"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"GitHub's source code management is top-notch. It's easy to inspect changes and visualize code and differences. Their action system is comprehensive in terms of making changes and automation."

"The versioning of the code and the tracking of changes are definitely some of my top features."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The user experience is tedious and long-winded. It could also be smoother from an admin's perspective."

"Bitbucket Server can experience performance issues when pushing a large amount of code. This process may take a considerable amount of time."

"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."

"The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects."

"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."

"There might be further integration ideas for continuous deployment."

"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."

"Some of the capabilities that I am looking for from a command line are not really available."

More Bitbucket Server cons

"The descriptions within Github could be more user-friendly to show the trees of Gitflow."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"We are not able to access GitHub from our VPN."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a cost to use this solution but it is based on how many users are using it. If you have 50 users or 1,000 users the price will be very different."

"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing. The licensing is based on the number of users, but I'm not entirely certain about the details."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly. Prices can become expensive if you have a lot of users."

"One needs to pay towards the licensing charges associated with the product."

"As for licensing, Bitbucket is one of the more affordable options."

"We pay around $6 per user."

"The platform offers a free version for public repositories, which benefits open-source projects."

"The solution comes as a part of the suite."

More Bitbucket Server pricing and cost advice

"I use the free version of the tool."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user185772

Senior Software Architect with 5,001-10,000 employees

Oct 27, 2015

GitHub vs. GitLab vs. BitBucket Server (Formerly Stash)

Originally posted at http://technologyconversations.com/2015/10/16/github-vs-gitlabs-vs-bitbucket-server-formerly-stash/ This article will try to compare GitHub, GitLab and BitBucket Server (previously called Stash) installed on your own servers. Similar comparison of cloud offerings is outside…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Bitbucket Server?

The product is easy to maintain.

What needs improvement with Bitbucket Server?

The improvements in the product could be made to expand third-party integrations and enhance support for open-source projects.

What is your primary use case for Bitbucket Server?

We use the solution primarily to manage and version our code repositories. It integrates with our continuous integration and continuous deployment (CICD) processes. Specifically, we utilize the pip...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

Bitbucket vs Bitbucket Server

Comparisons

Compared 98% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Bitbucket Server

Compared 2% of the time

More Bitbucket Server Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 19% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Bitbucket Server

Download Bitbucket Server product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

Stash

No data available

Learn More

Atlassian

Overview

Bitbucket Server is a preferred choice for managing source code and version control, facilitating development workflows like CI/CD, task tracking, and collaboration among teams.

Organizations use Bitbucket Server to handle multiple repositories, manage code pipelines, and support various development workflows including CI/CD deployment. Integration with Jenkins and Jira enhances the software development lifecycle, meeting specific project requirements. Key features include user-friendly management, ease of use, and private repositories, fostering efficient code promotion and collaboration. However, improvements are needed in command-line functionality, UI, log handling, and integration with third-party tools.

What are Bitbucket Server's key features?

User-friendly management: Simplifies source code and repository management.
Version control: Effective tool for tracking and managing code changes.
Code collaboration: Facilitates teamwork and peer reviews.
CI/CD pipeline support: Enables automated deployment processes.
Seamless integration: Works well with tools like Jenkins and Jira.
Private repositories: Secure storage for project code bases.

What benefits should users expect?

Performance: Reliable and stable performance for development tasks.
Task tracking: Efficient management of development workflows.
Code promotion: Smooth transition of code across environments.
Enhanced collaboration: Improved teamwork and communication.

In industries like software development and IT services, Bitbucket Server implementation varies. Companies may integrate it into DevOps workflows for continuous integration and deployment. It's also used in sectors requiring stringent version control and collaboration, ensuring efficient project management and delivery.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Netflix, Nasa, Rakuten, Best Buy, Philips, Nordstrom, Intuit, Zillow, Citi.

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Bitbucket Server vs. GitHub