Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

AWS CodeCommit vs Atlassian SourceTree comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 14, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Atlassian SourceTree
Ranking in Version Control
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
AWS CodeCommit
Ranking in Version Control
5th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Atlassian SourceTree is 5.6%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS CodeCommit is 7.3%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control
 

Featured Reviews

Francisco Castrillo - PeerSpot reviewer
May 23, 2024
Allows fast and effective management of branches and integration
I used Atlassian SourceTree to demo integration with Jira and other tools like GitLab, GitHub, and Bitbucket. It provides visibility on the Jira side by linking issues from Jira For me, the branches graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during…
Priyam Vaidya - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 10, 2024
Provides versioning and helps push code onto the production environment
Anyone can use the solution because AWS's documentation is very nice. Even if you know nothing about AWS CodeCommit, you can follow the documentation. We wanted something that could be pushed directly to the testing environment first and then to the production environment. I suggested that a CI/CD pipeline with CodeCommit would benefit this case because it can integrate with various development environments. I would recommend AWS CodeCommit if the requirement is CI/CD. It integrates well with the development environment and makes pushing and regulating the code easy. I will definitely use AWS CodeCommit in CI/CD processes. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The interface is very good and is easy to use. It tells you when you've committed, when you've uploaded, and gives you the differences."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to fix a broken repository merge."
"The tool's UI is good."
"For me, the branches ' graph was the most valuable feature of Atlassian SourceTree. I often used the terminal, but during a demo, my boss preferred I not switch to the terminal view. SourceTree's graphical interface for managing branches was handy for that. The demo involved making changes, committing them, pushing to the CI/CD tool, running the pipeline, and seeing the integration, all within about twenty minutes."
"The solution's initial setup process is straightforward."
"It helps us to install our code idea projects."
"AWS CodeCommit has the usual version control features, and it integrates with AWS CodeGuru for code reviews."
"AWS CodeCommit is much easier to use than Bitbucket. It doesn't require any personal password or these things. We just need to put in our AWS account password and username."
"AWS CodeCommit is simple and cheap."
"The most valuable feature of AWS CodeCommit is that it acts as a code repository with code versioning and approval features similar to those found on GitHub."
"The solution's most valuable feature is versioning."
 

Cons

"Its interface could be easy to understand for a programmer."
"The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done."
"I have had a food experience with Atlassian SourceTree but it might not be for everyone."
"The product's UI needs improvement."
"For everyday use, I am more comfortable using the command line interface, rather than using SourceTree."
"There are some options in Bitbucket that are not available in AWS CodeCommit. For example, code reviewer. We can't add a code reviewer in AWS CodeCommit, and we can't fork the repository online. These are the two things that Bitbucket has, but the solution doesn't have. Also, Jira has a debugging option that AWS CodeCommit doesn't have. Another thing is that Bitbucket charges three dollars per month per user. Compared with AWS CodeCommit, that only charges one dollar per month. So, AWS CodeCommit is cheaper than Bitbucket. But it does not have enough features that Bitbucket has. Additionally, it will be good if you upload one video or documentation on how to use AWS CodeCommit for beginners. That will be more helpful. There you can add more details about pricing. There are not many details about pricing. Bitbucket has a table where they have mentioned everything in detail, like, what features for how much price, how much longer you can use and how many users can use."
"The tool should improve its UI."
"The solution could be more user-friendly and cheaper."
"Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a fee for using SourceTree."
"Atlassian SourceTree is a free solution."
"I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite."
"The solution is expensive."
"AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."
"As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
University
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlassian SourceTree?
I do not recall the exact pricing details for SourceTree, but generally, Atlassian products are affordable, and SourceTree typically comes as part of a suite.
What needs improvement with Atlassian SourceTree?
There can be improvements in the way the messages are displayed in the tool. The visuals, including the UI and UX, have simple fonts, making it an area where certain enhancements can be done.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS CodeCommit?
AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors.
What needs improvement with AWS CodeCommit?
Migration in and out of CodeCommit should be improved. If someone wants to migrate to CodeCommit or migrate out of it, the process needs to be streamlined. This feature should be added.
 

Also Known As

No data available
CodeCommit
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Facebook, NASA, Cisco, eBay, Redfin, Toyota, Kaiser Permanente, Gilt, CSIRO, Autodesk, The Daily Telegraph, CODE, Illumnia,
Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob
Find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit vs. Atlassian SourceTree and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.