GitHub vs Mend.io comparison

GitHub and Mend.io are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. GitHub is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.9, while Mend.io is ranked #17 with an average rating of 9.0. GitHub holds a 0.8% mindshare in AS, compared to Mend.io’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Mend.io users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,615 Views
1,126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mend.io

Read 30 Mend.io reviews

7,253 Views
4,365 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

GitHub

Mend.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

GitHub and Mend.io offer unique strengths for tech buyers evaluating these platforms for software development and security management. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to user satisfaction with its pricing and support, while Mend.io is noted for its advanced features and security focus.

Features:GitHub users value the extensive integration capabilities, collaboration tools, and version control. Mend.io users appreciate its robust security features, automation in code analysis, and comprehensive reporting.

Room for Improvement:GitHub users suggest better performance with large repositories, enhanced search functionalities, and improvements in user interface consistency. Mend.io users seek improvements in setup complexity, UI intuitiveness, and better initial deployment experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:GitHub receives positive reviews for its straightforward deployment and strong customer service, offering various support channels. Mend.io, despite having thorough onboarding documentation, is rated lower for its initial deployment experience but compensates with dedicated support once set up.

Pricing and ROI:GitHub users are happy with its cost-effectiveness and quick ROI, highlighting its affordability for startups and small teams. Mend.io users accept its higher setup costs, recognizing the significant ROI due to comprehensive security and automation features.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Mend.io Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Mend.io

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,168 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mend.io

Ranking in Application Security Tools

17th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Static Code Analysis (4th), Software Supply Chain Security (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mend.io is 3.4%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Enables smooth management of vulnerabilities and promotes a shift towards a culture of security

We have witnessed Mend.io for its high stability, consistently living up to our expectations in terms of performance and reliability. Our developers have reported very few issues and almost minimal to zero downtime, which is a critical factor for our organization to rely on Mend SCA to secure our applications. We didn't experience any major issues in the stability of the product. This level of dependability is crucial for our hundreds of development teams that need to maintain continuous integration and deployment processes without interruptions. We realize the solution's architecture is designed to support a wide range of use cases, making it suitable for organizations of varying sizes and complexities. As a SaaS (Software as a Service) offering, Mend.io eliminates the need for physical server management, which further contributes to its stability. Users can access the platform without worrying about hardware failures or maintenance issues that can affect on-premises solutions. Moreover, Mend.io's integration capabilities with existing workflows—including IDEs, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines—enhance its stability by providing a seamless user experience. This integration allows teams to incorporate security scanning into their development processes without significant disruptions, which is often a challenge with less stable solutions. Feedback from our developers and architects highlights the tool's effectiveness in reducing open-source software vulnerabilities while maintaining a streamlined development lifecycle. Our organization have experienced improved code quality and faster incident response times as a result of using Mend.io. The platform's intuitive dashboard and management views are also praised by our developers for their usability, contributing to a positive user experience. In short, Mend.io stands out as a dependable and reliable solution in the realm of software composition analysis. Its high stability, combined with robust integration capabilities and user-friendly features, makes it an excellent choice for organizations seeking to enhance their security posture while minimizing operational disruptions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A great feature is being able to have different repositories and different kinds of projects in a single solution at a single time. It's just a click away."

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."

"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"GitHub is pure or open-source; you can access it anywhere. You can have a lot of collateral information. You can make the changes and do the reviews from one place."

More GitHub pros

"For us, the most valuable tool was open-source licensing analysis."

"I am the organizational deployment administrator for this tool, and I, along with other users in our company, especially the security team, appreciate the solution for several reasons. The UI is excellent, and scanning for security threats fits well into our workflow."

"The most valuable feature is the unified JAR to scan for all langs (wss-scanner jar)."

"Mend.io is very robust in terms of managing third-party dependencies."

"The solution is scalable."

"WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since the adoption of the product."

"The solution boasts a broad range of features and covers much of what an ideal SCA tool should."

"Attribution and license due diligence reports help us with aggregating the necessary data that we, in turn, have to provide to satisfy the various licenses copyright and component usage disclosures in our software."

More Mend.io pros

Cons

"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."

"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."

"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."

"We want to incorporate management comments within GitHub, making it more like a product management tool. We haven't done that yet. Another change we're considering is migrating from GitHub to Azure DevOps, especially now that Microsoft has introduced it."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

"I would like to see integration with Slack such that all of the changes made in GitHub are reflected there."

"There could be some improvements related to the automation of certain processes, especially with the integration of artificial intelligence."

"GitHub could automate the setup process more, such as creating YAML files for GitHub Actions."

More GitHub cons

"Mend lets you create custom policies. They're not too complicated to set up, but it would be helpful if they had some preconfigured policies to match what we have in Azure DevOps. That would save us a lot of time. It's tedious to configure the policies manually, and I lack the capacity to do it right now. Other products have preconfigured packs and templates, and Mend doesn't."

"Make the product available in a very stable way for other web browsers."

"The turnaround time for upgrading databases for this tool as well as the accuracy could be improved."

"I rated the solution an eight out of ten because WhiteSource hasn't built in a couple of features that we would have loved to use and they say they're on their roadmap. I'm hoping that they'll be able to build and deliver in 2022."

"Some detected libraries do not specify a location of where in the source they were matched from, which is something that should be enhanced to enable quicker troubleshooting."

"Needs better ACL and more role definitions. This product could be used by large organisations and it definitely needs a better role/action model."

"The dashboard UI and UX are problematic."

"AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature."

More Mend.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"This is an expensive solution."

"Pricing and licensing are comparable to other tools. When we started, it was less than our existing solution. I can't go into specifics, but it isn't cheap."

"We are paying a lot of money to use WhiteSource. In our company, it is not easy to argue that it is worth the price. "

"As we were using an SaaS-based service, the solution must be scalable, although my understanding is that this is based on the licensing model one is using."

"The solution involves a yearly licensing fee."

"Over the last two years, they have tried to add more and more features to their license packages, but the price is a little bit high, comparatively."

"We always negotiate for the best price possible, and as far as I know, Mend has done an excellent job with their pricing. Our management is happy with the pricing, which has led to renewals."

"WhiteSource is much more affordable than Veracode."

More Mend.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

University

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?

We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Mend.io?

The best feature is that the Mend R&D team does their due diligence for all the vulnerabilities. In case they observe any important or critical vulnerabilities, such as the Log4j-related vulner...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 19% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Surround SCM vs GitHub

Compared 3% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Mend.io

Compared 25% of the time

Black Duck vs Mend.io

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs Mend.io

Compared 9% of the time

Veracode vs Mend.io

Compared 8% of the time

JFrog Xray vs Mend.io

Compared 6% of the time

More Mend.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2024

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Mend.io

December 2024

Download Mend.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST

Learn More

GitHub

Mend.io

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.

Mend.io Features

Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Vulnerability analysis
Automated remediation
Seamless integration
Business prioritization
Limitless scalability
Intuitive interface
Language support
Integration
Continuous monitoring
Remediation suggestions
Customization

Mend.io Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Easy to use: The Mend.io platform is very user-friendly and easy to set up.

Third-party libraries: The solution eases the process of keeping track of all the used third-party dependencies within a product. It not only scans for the pure occurrence (also transitively) but also takes care of licenses and vulnerabilities.

Static code analysis: With Mend.io’s static code analysis, you can quickly identify security weaknesses in custom code across desktop, web, and mobile applications.

Broad support: Mend.io provides 27 different programming languages and various programming frameworks.

Easy integration: Mend.io makes integration very easy with existing DevOps environments and CI/CD pipelines so developers don’t need to manually configure or trigger the scan.

Ultra-fast scanning engine: The solution’s scanning engine generates results up to ten times faster than legacy SAST solutions.

Unified developer experience: Mend.io has a unified developer experience inside the code repository that shows side-by-side security alerts and remediation suggestions for custom code and open-source code.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.

Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”

PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”

An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”

Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Mend.io

December 2024

Free Report: GitHub vs. Mend.io

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Mend.io and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Mend.io report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.