Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Checkmarx One and GitHub compete in the software development security industry. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities with third-party tools and version control functionalities, which are key strengths in a collaborative development environment.

Features: Checkmarx One is equipped with a range of tools for identifying code vulnerabilities, such as SAST and application tracking, along with incremental scanning capabilities and support for multiple languages. GitHub is known for its version control capabilities, seamless third-party tool integration, and project organization features. It also benefits from its open-source nature, which encourages community-driven innovation.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from reducing false positives and expanding language support. Additionally, enhancing its user interface and exploring more flexible pricing models would be advantageous. GitHub could improve user-friendliness, particularly in handling code conflicts, and enhance support documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds but receives mixed feedback on technical support, highlighting a need for quicker resolutions. GitHub efficiently deploys on public and hybrid clouds with a straightforward setup, often requiring minimal customer service due to its user-friendly nature and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is priced as a premium product, which reflects its extensive security offerings and generally results in a favorable ROI through improved security and development cycles. GitHub offers cost-effectiveness, particularly with its free tier for open-source projects, and its competitive pricing makes it accessible for wider use while maintaining a collaborative, secure environment.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.7%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"What I like best about Checkmarx is that it has fewer false positives than other products, giving you better results."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."

"The most valuable feature is that it actually identifies the different criteria you can set to meet whatever standards you're trying to get your system accredited for."

"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."

"The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly."

"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."

"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."

"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."

"The deployment is fast since we just have to run the script, and once it's done, it takes a few minutes."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"The validation process needs to be sped up."

"We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives."

"The interactive application security testing, or IAST, the interactive part where you're looking at an application that lives in a runtime environment on a server or virtual machine, needs improvement."

"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."

"Checkmarx could improve by reducing the price."

"I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

"Meta data is always needed."

More Checkmarx One cons

"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."

"I cannot recall coming across any shortcomings of the product."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

"There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished."

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"The ticketing system is not working."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is fine."

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"Most of my customers opted for a perpetual license. They prefer to pay the highest amount up front for the perpetual license and then pay for additional support annually."

"Its price is fair. It is in or around the right spot. Ultimately, if the price is wrong, customers won't commit, but they do tend to commit. It is neither too cheap nor too expensive."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"Be cautious of the one-year subscription date. Once it expires, your price will go up."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"The private repositories are free, which is very good."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 42% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx One

Download Checkmarx One product report

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub