Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,347 Views
1,098 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Checkmarx One and GitHub compete in the software development security industry. GitHub seems to have the upper hand due to its integration capabilities with third-party tools and version control functionalities, which are key strengths in a collaborative development environment.

Features: Checkmarx One is equipped with a range of tools for identifying code vulnerabilities, such as SAST and application tracking, along with incremental scanning capabilities and support for multiple languages. GitHub is known for its version control capabilities, seamless third-party tool integration, and project organization features. It also benefits from its open-source nature, which encourages community-driven innovation.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could benefit from reducing false positives and expanding language support. Additionally, enhancing its user interface and exploring more flexible pricing models would be advantageous. GitHub could improve user-friendliness, particularly in handling code conflicts, and enhance support documentation for beginners.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One offers deployment flexibility across on-premises, private, and public clouds but receives mixed feedback on technical support, highlighting a need for quicker resolutions. GitHub efficiently deploys on public and hybrid clouds with a straightforward setup, often requiring minimal customer service due to its user-friendly nature and strong community support.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is priced as a premium product, which reflects its extensive security offerings and generally results in a favorable ROI through improved security and development cycles. GitHub offers cost-effectiveness, particularly with its free tier for open-source projects, and its competitive pricing makes it accessible for wider use while maintaining a collaborative, secure environment.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

April 2025

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (24th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (4th), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (10th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.3%, down from 14.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."

"Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution."

"The main advantage of this solution is its centralized reporting functionality, which lets us track issues, then see and report on the priorities via a web portal."

"We use the solution to validate the source code and do SAST and security analysis."

"The main thing we find valuable about Checkmarx is the ease of use. It's easy to initiate scans and triage defects."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"Has great integration with third-party tools."

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"GitHub is good for small companies and for personal use."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"If it is a very large code base then we have a problem where we cannot scan it."

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?"

"Checkmarx has a slightly difficult compilation with the CI/CD pipeline."

"The solution sometimes reports a false auditable code or false positive."

"Creating and editing custom rules in Checkmarx is difficult because the license for the editor comes at an additional cost, and there is a steep learning curve."

"It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues."

"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."

More Checkmarx One cons

"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."

"Regarding improvements, I preferred the tool's earlier pricing model, which limited storage and the number of repositories instead of the number of users, which was more convenient from a customer perspective. I've also experienced issues with GitHub servers being unable to support moving repositories, which caused problems. For basic plans, no support was available to help resolve these issues. I think GitHub should provide more support for smaller businesses to help with these problems."

"We want to incorporate management comments within GitHub, making it more like a product management tool. We haven't done that yet. Another change we're considering is migrating from GitHub to Azure DevOps, especially now that Microsoft has introduced it."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished."

"We face issues with synchronization while working with teams."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"It is a good product but a little overpriced."

"The solution is costly."

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution."

"I believe pricing is better compared to other commercial tools."

"The pricing was not very good. This is just a framework which shouldn’t cost so much."

"It is an expensive solution."

"The average deal size was usually anywhere between $120K to $175K on an annual basis, which could be divided across 12 months."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"I use the free version of the tool."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 39% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Download Checkmarx One product report

Checkmarx One

May 2025

Download GitHub product report

April 2025

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent