Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,518 Views
1,112 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Checkmarx One and GitHub compete in the software development and security space. Checkmarx holds an advantage in code vulnerability scanning and remediation guidance, while GitHub excels in collaboration and code management.

Features: Checkmarx One excels in comprehensive code analysis, integration with development tools, and detailed reporting, enabling developers to enhance secure coding skills. It supports many programming languages and performs security checks across various environments. GitHub is known for its version control and collaboration features, supporting project management through pull requests, code reviews, and actions. It integrates extensively with development lifecycle tools and maintains robust code versioning.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One could reduce false positives, expand programming language support, and improve licensing flexibility. Its setup may require complex customization, and users seek clearer documentation and broader tool integrations. GitHub users request better security features, integration with project management tools, and user-friendliness for non-technical members. Handling large files and enhancing automation in workflows are also noted areas for improvement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One supports on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud setups but faces challenges in complex deployments. Its technical support is responsive but could improve on extended ticket handling. GitHub, primarily cloud-based, is easier to deploy with reliable support and straightforward technical assistance, emphasizing cloud simplicity and user-friendly deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is viewed as expensive, influenced by user numbers and language support, offering significant ROI through security enhancements. Its pricing model is considered rigid, seen as a premium option. GitHub is cost-effective, especially with its free tier for public repositories, offering competitive rates for private ones. Users find its pricing reasonable, highlighting flexibility and accessibility.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (21st), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (3rd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (8th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 10.7%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It has all the features we need."

"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."

"The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database."

"The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly."

"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."

"The product's most valuable feature is static code and supply chain effect analysis. It provides a lot of visibility."

"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."

"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."

More Checkmarx One pros

"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"I have found GitHub stable."

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"The most valuable features are the speed, low latency, and the clear, concise set of commands."

"The features of GitHub are very nice and helpful for developers."

"The most valuable features of GitHub are the ease of integration into Microsoft Azure DevOps. The process that you need to deploy into Microsoft Azure becomes fairly simple and the templates are already available, a lot of the engineers find it easier to use."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."

"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."

"The pricing can get a bit expensive, depending on the company's size."

"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."

"Checkmarx could improve the REST APIs by including automation."

"I really would like to integrate it as a service along with the SAP HANA Cloud Platform. It will then be easy to use it directly as a service."

"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."

"Meta data is always needed."

More Checkmarx One cons

"There could be more integration into Azure."

"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."

"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The user interface on GitLab is better."

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Checkmarx could be reduced to match their competitors, it is expensive."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"Before implementing the product I would evaluate if it is really necessary to scan so many different languages and frameworks. If not, I think there must be a cheaper solution for scanning Java-only applications (which are 90% of our applications)."

"Checkmarx is not a cheap scanning tool, but none of the security tools are cheap. Checkmarx is a powerful scanning tool, and it’s essential to have one of these products."

"We got a special offer for a 30% reduction for three years, after our first year. I think for a real source-code scanning tool, you have to add a lot of money for Open Source Analysis, and AppSec Coach (160 Euro per user per year)."

"The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 43% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 6% of the time

Checkmarx SAST vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

OWASP Zap vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx One

Download Checkmarx One product report

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

Checkmarx

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub