Checkmarx One vs GitHub comparison

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,615 Views
1,126 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Checkmarx One

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

Checkmarx One and GitHub are leading tools in the software development and security industry. While Checkmarx One excels in pricing and support, GitHub's extensive features make it a superior choice for many users.

Features: Checkmarx One offers robust security scanning, detailed vulnerability reporting, and strong focus on security. GitHub provides collaboration tools, integration capabilities, and comprehensive code management features.

Room for Improvement: Checkmarx One needs better integration with third-party tools, improved learning curve, and enhanced extensibility. GitHub requires stronger security features, more flexible pricing plans, and enhanced user support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Checkmarx One has a straightforward deployment process with strong customer support, while GitHub offers a flexible deployment model but receives mixed reviews on customer service responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: Checkmarx One is noted for competitive setup costs and favorable ROI due to its focus on security outcomes. GitHub, though more expensive, is valued for its comprehensive features that justify the higher cost for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Checkmarx One vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2024).

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Checkmarx One

Ranking in Application Security Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (3rd), Vulnerability Management (20th), Static Code Analysis (2nd), API Security (2nd), DevSecOps (2nd), Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (6th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Checkmarx One is 12.5%, down from 15.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Rohit Kesharwani

Manager, Engineering at 7-Eleven.

Provides good security analysis and security identification within the source code

We integrate Checkmarx into our software development cycle using GitLab's CI/CD pipeline. Checkmark has been the most helpful for us in the development stage. The solution's incremental scanning feature has impacted our development speed. The solution's vulnerability detection is around 80% to 90% accurate. I would recommend Checkmarx to other users because it is one of the good tools for doing security analysis and security identification within the source code. Overall, I rate Checkmarx a nine out of ten.

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the SCA module and the code-checking module. Additionally, the solutions are explanatory and helpful."

"The setup is very easy. There is a lot of information in the documents which makes the install not difficult at all."

"From my point of view, it is the best product on the market."

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."

"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."

"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."

"I like that you don't have to compile the code in order to execute static code analysis. So, it's very handy."

"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."

More Checkmarx One pros

"The product's initial setup phase is easy but it is always good to connect with GitHub's team that manages APIs."

"I find GitHub's pull request strategies and GitHub Actions to be very valuable."

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

"GitHub provides enough storage for uploading the source code."

"The support team is good."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated."

"Checkmarx could improve the solution reports and false positives. The false positives could be reduced. For example, we have alerts that are tagged as vulnerabilities but when you drill down they are not."

"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."

"The Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) feature should be better."

"We can run only one project at a time."

"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."

"We would like to be able to run scans from our local system, rather than having to always connect to the product server, which is a longer process."

"In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now."

More Checkmarx One cons

"The security point should be addressed in the next release and scaling is also an issue."

"GitHub storage is one of the main requirements and it could improve."

"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."

"Though I haven't done much research, GitHub lacks in providing more functions like GitLab."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult. Signing up was challenging at that time."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"GitHub could add more security features. I am not sure how secure it is. If they provide more security features, then it can be used in more official applications."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution’s pricing an eight out of ten. The tool’s pricing is higher than others and it is for the license alone."

"The solution is costly."

"Checkmarx is comparatively costlier than other products, which is why some of the customers feel reluctant to go for it, though performance-wise, Checkmarx can compete with other products."

"It is not expensive, but sometimes, their pricing model or licensing model is not very clear. There are similar variables, such as projects or developers, and sometimes, it is a little bit confusing."

"It is the right price for quality delivery."

"We're using a commercial version of Checkmarx, and we paid for the solution for one year. The price is high and could be reduced."

"The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

"For around 250 users or committers, the cost is approximately $500,000."

More Checkmarx One pricing and cost advice

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"The basic licensing model is free, and if you need to have technical support and such things, then it does cost something. You only need to pay extra if you need technical support."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What alternatives are there for Fortify WebInspect and Fortify SCA?

I would like to recommend Checkmarx. With Checkmarx, you are able to have an all in one solution for SAST and SCA as well. Veracode is only a cloud solution. Hope this helps.

What do you like most about Checkmarx?

Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Checkmarx?

The pricing is relatively expensive due to the product's quality and performance, but it is worth it.

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Checkmarx One

Comparisons

Compared 48% of the time

Veracode vs Checkmarx One

Compared 13% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Checkmarx One

Compared 5% of the time

Coverity vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

Snyk vs Checkmarx One

Compared 4% of the time

More Checkmarx One Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs GitHub

Compared 5% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Checkmarx One

Download Checkmarx One product report

Download GitHub product report

Learn More

Checkmarx

Overview

Checkmarx One is an enterprise cloud-native application security platform focused on providing cross-tool, correlated results to help AppSec and developer teams prioritize where to focus time and resources.

Checkmarx One offers comprehensive application scanning across the SDLC:

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)
API security
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Container security
IaC security
Correlation, prioritization, and risk management
Codebashing secure code training
AI security
Tech partnerships extending AppSec into runtime analysis
Developer tool integrations including: CI/CD tools, development frameworks, feedback tools, IDEs, programming languages and SCMs

Checkmarx One provides everything you need to secure application development from the first line of code through deployment and runtime in the cloud. With an ever-evolving set of AppSec engines, correlation and prioritization features, and AI capabilities, Checkmarx One helps consolidate expanding lists of AppSec tools and make better sense of results. Its capabilities are designed to provide an improved developer experience to build trust with development teams and ensure the success of your AppSec program investment.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Checkmarx One vs. GitHub