Fortify on Demand vs GitHub comparison

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,513 Views
1,120 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortify on Demand

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Fortify on Demand and GitHub compete in the application security and code management category. Fortify on Demand has a stronger focus on security features, while GitHub excels in collaboration and integration capabilities.

Features: Fortify on Demand accurately correlates static and dynamic results, offers real-time dashboards for vulnerability tracking, and includes manual reviews by security experts. GitHub's strengths are in source code management, version control, and seamless integration with various DevOps tools.

Room for Improvement: Fortify on Demand could improve integration with incident management and provide more customization options for reports. GitHub could enhance its AI functionalities, improve licensing management, and ease integration with CI/CD tools like Jenkins.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortify on Demand supports on-premises, private, and hybrid cloud environments, with some issues reported in technical support responsiveness. GitHub operates mainly in public and hybrid cloud spaces, with generally good customer support and effective community resources.

Pricing and ROI: Fortify on Demand's pricing is considered expensive due to a per-scan subscription model, but its robust security features contribute to ROI. GitHub is more cost-effective, offering free and open-source options, with enterprise use possibly involving additional licensing costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortify on Demand vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

Fortify on Demand vs. GitHub

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortify on Demand

Ranking in Application Security Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (9th)

GitHub

Ranking in Application Security Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Version Control (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of Fortify on Demand is 4.6%, down from 4.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Jonathan Steyn

Principal Technical Consultant at EOH

Source code analyzer, FPR file generation, reduction of false positives and generates compliance reports, for in-depth analysis

Not challenges with the product itself. The product is very reliable. It does have a steep learning curve. But, again, one thing that Fortify or OpenText does very well is training. There are a lot of free resources and training in the community forums, free training as well as commercial training where users can train on how to use the back-end systems and the scanning engines and how to use command-line arguments because some of the procedures or some of the tools do require a bit of a learning curve. That's the only challenge I've really seen for customers because you have to learn how to use the tool effectively. But Fortify has, in fact, improved its user interface and the way users engage the dashboards and the interfaces. It is intuitive. It's easy to understand. But in some regards, the cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions. But from the point of the reliability index and how powerful the tool is, there's no challenge there. But it's just from a learning perspective; users might need a bit more skill to use the tool. The user interface isn't that tedious. It's not that difficult to understand. When I initially learned how to use the interfaces, I was able to master it within a week and was able to use it quite effectively. So training is required. All skills are needed to learn how to use the tool. I would like to see more enhancements in the dashboards. Dashboards are available. They do need some configuration and settings. But I would like to see more business intelligence capabilities within the tool. It's not particularly a cybersecurity function, but, for instance, business impact analysis or other features where you can actually use business intelligence capabilities within your security tool. That would be remarkable because not only do you have a cybersecurity tool, but you also have a tool that can give you business impact analysis and some other measurements. A bit more intelligence in terms of that from a cybersecurity perspective would be remarkable.

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the capacity to be able to check vulnerabilities during the development process. The development team can check whether the code they are using is vulnerable to some type of attack or there is some type of vulnerability so that they can mitigate it. It helps us in achieving a more secure approach towards internal applications. It is an intuitive solution. It gives all the information that a developer needs to remediate a vulnerability in the coding process. It also gives you some examples of how to remediate a vulnerability in different programming languages. This solution is pretty much what we were searching for."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to submit your code and have it run in the background. Then, if something comes up that is more specific, you have the security analyst who can jump in and help, if needed."

"The most valuable feature is that it connects with your development platforms, such as Microsoft Information Server and Jira."

"It has saved us a lot of time as we focus primarily on programming rather than tool operational work."

"The source code analyzer is the most effective for identifying security vulnerabilities."

"Being able to reduce risk overall is a very valuable feature for us."

"Fortify helps us to stay updated with the newest languages and versions coming out."

"The most valuable features of Micro Focus Fortify on Demand have been SAT analysis and application security."

More Fortify on Demand pros

"The most valuable features of GitHub are the ease of integration into Microsoft Azure DevOps. The process that you need to deploy into Microsoft Azure becomes fairly simple and the templates are already available, a lot of the engineers find it easier to use."

"We use GitHub as a repository."

"GitHub is convenient and easy to use."

"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"The version control functionality for this solution has been most valuable, especially when managing projects with multiple versions."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"It does scanning for all virtual machines and other things, but it doesn't do the scanning for containers. It currently lacks the ability to do the scanning on containers. We're asking their product management team to expand this capability to containers."

"There are lots of limitations with code technology. It cannot scan .net properly either."

"It's still a little bit too complex for regular developers. It takes a little bit more time than usual. I know static code scan is not the main focus of the tool, but the overall time span to scan the code, and even to set up the code scanning, is a bit overwhelming for regular developers."

"Temenos's (T-24) info basic is a separate programming interface, and such proprietary platforms and programming interfaces were not easily supported by the out-of-the-box versions of Fortify."

"During development, when our developer makes changes to their code, they typically use GitHub or GitLab to track those changes. However, proper integration between Fortify on Demand and GitHub and GitLab is not there yet. Improved integration would be very valuable to us."

"The cybersecurity specialist or AppSec would need a bit of training to engage the user interface and to understand how it functions."

"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there."

"It natively supports only a few languages. They can include support for more native languages. The response time from the support team can also be improved. They can maybe include video tutorials explaining the remediation process. The remediation process is sometimes not that clear. It would be helpful to have videos. Sometimes, the solution that the tool gives in the GUI is not straightforward to understand for the developer. At present, for any such issues, you have to create a ticket for the support team and request help from the support team."

More Fortify on Demand cons

"The ticketing system is not working."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

"The development team pushes the code into a repository, and the CI/CD pipeline will perform the build. We need open-source libraries to perform the builds. It would be helpful to have the ability to link to open-source libraries like npm libraries. I don't know if GitHub Actions provides this. I would like to see that in GitHub Actions if they don't."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The subscription model, on a per-scan basis, is a bit expensive. That's another reason we are not using it for all the apps."

"Fortify on Demand is moderately priced, but its pricing could be more flexible."

"Fortify on Demand is more expensive than Burpsuite. I rate its pricing a nine out of ten."

"Despite being on the higher end in terms of cost, the biggest value lies in its abilities, including robust features, seamless integration, and high-quality findings."

"I'd rate it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The solution is expensive and the price could be reduced."

"The pricing can be improved because it is complex when compared to the competition."

"Buying a license would be feasible for regular use. For intermittent use, the cloud-based option can be used (Fortify on Demand)."

More Fortify on Demand pricing and cost advice

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

It helps deploy and track changes easily as per time-to-time market upgrades.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

In comparison with other tools, they're competitive. It is not more expensive than other solutions, but their pricing is competitive. The licenses for Fortify On Demand are generally bought in unit...

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

There are frequent complaints about false positives from Fortify. One day it may pass a scan with no issues, and the next day, without any code changes, it will report vulnerabilities such as passw...

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Fortify on Demand

Comparisons

Compared 19% of the time

Veracode vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 14% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 11% of the time

Fortify Software Security Center vs Fortify on Demand

Compared 2% of the time

More Fortify on Demand Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

Mend.io vs GitHub

Compared 7% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Fortify on Demand

Download Fortify on Demand product report

Download GitHub product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

No data available

Overview

Fortify on Demand is a web application security testing tool that enables continuous monitoring. The solution is designed to help you with security testing, vulnerability management and tailored expertise, and is able to provide the support needed to easily create, supplement, and expand a software security assurance program without the need for additional infrastructure or resources.

Fortify on Demand Features

Fortify on Demand has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Deployment flexibility
Scalability
Built for DevSecOps
Ease of use
Supports 27+ languages
Real-time vulnerability identification with
Security Assistant
Actionable results in less than 1 hour for most applications with DevOps automation
Expanded coverage, accuracy and remediation details with IAST runtime agent
Continuous application monitoring of production applications
Virtual patches
Supports iOS and Android mobile applications
Security vulnerability identification
Behavioral and reputation analysis

Fortify on Demand Benefits

There are several benefits to implementing Fortify on Demand. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Fast remediation: With Fortify on Demand you can achieve fast remediation throughout the software lifecycle with robust assessments by a team of security experts.

Easy integration: The solution’s integration ecosystem is easy to use, creating a more secure software supply chain.

Security testing: Fortify on Demand covers in-depth mobile app security testing, open-source analysis, and vendor application security management, in addition to static and dynamic testing.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Fortify on Demand solution.

Dionisio V., Senior System Analyst at Azurian, says, "One of the top features is the source code review for vulnerabilities. When we look at source code, it's hard to see where areas may be weak in terms of security, and Fortify on Demand's source code review helps with that." He goes on to add, “Another reason I like Fortify on Demand is because our code often includes open source libraries, and it's important to know when the library is outdated or if it has any known vulnerabilities in it. This information is important to us when we're developing our solutions and Fortify on Demand informs us when it detects any vulnerable open source libraries.”

A Security Systems Analyst at a retailer mentions, “Being able to reduce risk overall is a very valuable feature for us.”

Jayashree A., Executive Manager at PepsiCo, comments, “Once we have our project created with our application pipeline connected to the test scanning, it only takes two minutes. The report explaining what needs to be modified related to security and vulnerabilities in our code is very helpful. We are able to do static and dynamic code scanning. When we are exploring some of the endpoints this solution identifies many loopholes that hackers could utilize for an attack. This has been very helpful and surprising how many vulnerabilities there can be.”

A Principal Solutions Architect at a security firm explains, “Its ability to perform different types of scans, keep everything in one place, and track the triage process in Fortify SSC stands out.”

PeerSpot user Mamta J., Co-Founder at TechScalable, states, "Almost all the features are good. This solution has simplified designing and architecting for our solutions. We were early adopters of microservices. Their documentation is good. You don't need to put in much effort in setting it up and learning stuff from scratch and start using it. The learning curve is not too much."

OpenText

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Fortify on Demand vs. GitHub