Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.3% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,449 Views
1,337 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,500 Views
1,099 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Github and Git are competing tools in the open-source and version control systems category. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and seamless integration with various DevOps tools.

Features: GitHub's notable features include advanced security, GitHub Actions for automation, and cloud-based repositories facilitating team collaboration and integration with tools like Jenkins and Jira. Git, a robust version control system, supports effective branching, merging, and history tracking. Its compatibility with both CLI and GUI ensures flexibility for different user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its security features, improve integration with project management and DevOps tools, and develop a more user-friendly interface for non-technical users. Git could focus on improving its GUI, offering better support for non-text files and large repositories, and enhancing merge conflict resolution capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is well-suited for public and hybrid cloud environments, fostering remote collaboration. Git offers deployment flexibility in both cloud and on-premises settings. GitHub's community support is strong, though improvements in direct customer service for complex issues would be beneficial, while Git could benefit from more responsive official support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid options, delivering cost-effective solutions with extensive features, though managing licenses can be cumbersome. Git, being open source, incurs no licensing costs, appealing to budget-conscious users. Both platforms deliver strong ROI, with GitHub's functionalities enhancing collaboration savings and Git offering economical version control.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.3%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The implementation is easy."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."

"You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"The setup process is pretty simple."

"The product is easy to use."

More Git pros

"We can make a private repository."

"It's beneficial for managing multiple tasks and controlling versions of your product."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."

"The solution can scale."

"I find GitHub very user friendly."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"If the solution could provide more language support options such as Korean, it would be helpful."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

More Git cons

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"GitHub should work on enhancing its search capability. The tool should add some more features and functionalities."

"This solution could be improved if migration was fully automated to make it easy, for example, to migrate repositories into GitHub."

"Github needs more storage."

"There could be more integration into Azure."

"The sign in process is a bit difficult. Signing up was challenging at that time."

"The integration with Visual Studio Code could be more streamlined."

"Could be more user friendly."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"We use the open-source version."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"The platform is less expensive."

"The tool is free."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 34% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 22% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

January 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

January 2025

Download GitHub product report

Learn More

Video not available

Git

GitHub

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

January 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.