Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.7% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,290 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Github and Git are competing tools in the open-source and version control systems category. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and seamless integration with various DevOps tools.

Features: GitHub's notable features include advanced security, GitHub Actions for automation, and cloud-based repositories facilitating team collaboration and integration with tools like Jenkins and Jira. Git, a robust version control system, supports effective branching, merging, and history tracking. Its compatibility with both CLI and GUI ensures flexibility for different user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its security features, improve integration with project management and DevOps tools, and develop a more user-friendly interface for non-technical users. Git could focus on improving its GUI, offering better support for non-text files and large repositories, and enhancing merge conflict resolution capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is well-suited for public and hybrid cloud environments, fostering remote collaboration. Git offers deployment flexibility in both cloud and on-premises settings. GitHub's community support is strong, though improvements in direct customer service for complex issues would be beneficial, while Git could benefit from more responsive official support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid options, delivering cost-effective solutions with extensive features, though managing licenses can be cumbersome. Git, being open source, incurs no licensing costs, appealing to budget-conscious users. Both platforms deliver strong ROI, with GitHub's functionalities enhancing collaboration savings and Git offering economical version control.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,767 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten...Since I am a very simple user of the tool, its scalability is good for me."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"The most valuable feature is having access to the local country repository even if we have problems with distance access."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"Git is easy to use."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"The product is easy to use."

More Git pros

"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"Complication free with good ability for third-party integrations."

"I find GitHub's pull request strategies and GitHub Actions to be very valuable."

"I find the most valuable collaboration between our peers to be a seamless collaboration between our peers. We can connect and change our code, allowing us to be agile in our projects. Since we're talking about DevOps, we're using Jenkins in our pipeline. It helps speed up the process by automating the DevOps workflow."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"I would like to see less updates with the product."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"I would like more documentation."

"The price could be improved."

More Git cons

"As of now, if I would like to learn about GitHub or its features, I would have to look on YouTube. It would be nice if they were able to send out a newsletter with explanations of new features that they are offering and what features are available."

"GitHub's issue management could be improved a little from an organization standpoint. It would be helpful to have the ability to organize a work board or a backlog more comprehensively. For organizations migrating to GitHub from arbitrary systems, it's a little bit of a headache to move on to that system."

"The security for this solution could be tightened up and improved."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

"Github needs more storage."

"It would be useful to have tutorial videos within the GitHub dashboard."

"The product must document the CI/CD process more."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"The tool is free."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"We use the open-source version."

"Git is completely free."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"I am using the free version of the solution. However, there are some costs my organization pays."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 35% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 18% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

March 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

March 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

March 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.