Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.1% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,571 Views
1,447 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,722 Views
1,162 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

GitHub and Git are leading version control systems. User reviews indicate GitHub has the upper hand due to its collaboration tools and integration with other development software, while Git is valued for its advanced features and flexibility.

Features: GitHub users value its collaboration tools, integration with other platforms, and enhanced security features. Git is praised for its branching and merging capabilities, extensive documentation, and powerful command-line interface.

Room for Improvement: GitHub users desire more robust offline support, better performance with large repositories, and improved features for managing large files. Git users often point to its steep learning curve, lack of a user-friendly web interface, and complicated setup process as areas needing enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is noted for its straightforward cloud-based deployment model and responsive customer service, making it easy to set up and well-supported. Git, being a distributed system, offers flexible deployment options but requires more initial setup effort and learning. Git’s support primarily relies on community resources, which can be a limitation for some users.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub’s pricing model is seen as higher, with plans starting at $4 per user per month, but users feel it offers good value due to its comprehensive features and support. Git, being open-source, has no direct setup costs, providing an excellent ROI, especially for advanced users who can leverage its full capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 823,875 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.1%, down from 9.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.4%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I use the solution for website management."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"All of the features in Git are useful."

"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."

"It is a pretty standard product with features like git clone and development branches."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

More Git pros

"You can write the code with AI. But when it comes to implementation, you must upgrade the bits of code that will support this and generate solutions based on that architecture. Then, you need comparable code bits. Therefore, AI can propose how much a specific function can be better optimized. So, AI can help stakeholders reach tasks quicker."

"The product helps our team collaborate across different locations."

"The most valuable feature of GitHub is version control and continuous integration."

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"We've found the technical support to be very helpful."

"The tool also helps organize collaboration by allowing users to share a repository with other developers."

"I find GitHub's pull request strategies and GitHub Actions to be very valuable."

"GitHub's version control is valuable."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"It's not very user-friendly."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"The main problem for me is the frequent upgrades in the solution because every other upgrade is a minefield. When you do the upgrade, there is always something that doesn't work."

More Git cons

"I faced one or two breakdowns. That said, they lasted only for a few seconds or a minute."

"It would be beneficial if GitHub provided some security scanning for new libraries to ensure that there are no viruses in it."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"The UI is a little outdated, so that could be improved."

"One thing GitHub could do is probably the same thing as what Sourcetree does. When solving merge conflicts, it would be helpful to have tooltips within the actions to know what changes could happen next when resolving a conflict."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

"If you are uploading or cloning a large file, with more than 25 megs, it's pretty slow."

"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Git is completely free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"We use the open-source version."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"I am not required to pay due to the small number of users we have. We have a small user base, and we are not using the enterprise version."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"There are no licensing fees for the features that we use."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 33% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 20% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 13% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 7% of the time

More Git Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 19% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

December 2024

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

December 2024

Download GitHub product report

Learn More

Video not available

Git

GitHub

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

December 2024

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.