Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.2% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,384 Views
1,264 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,282 Views
1,022 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Github and Git are competing tools in the open-source and version control systems category. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and seamless integration with various DevOps tools.

Features: GitHub's notable features include advanced security, GitHub Actions for automation, and cloud-based repositories facilitating team collaboration and integration with tools like Jenkins and Jira. Git, a robust version control system, supports effective branching, merging, and history tracking. Its compatibility with both CLI and GUI ensures flexibility for different user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its security features, improve integration with project management and DevOps tools, and develop a more user-friendly interface for non-technical users. Git could focus on improving its GUI, offering better support for non-text files and large repositories, and enhancing merge conflict resolution capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is well-suited for public and hybrid cloud environments, fostering remote collaboration. Git offers deployment flexibility in both cloud and on-premises settings. GitHub's community support is strong, though improvements in direct customer service for complex issues would be beneficial, while Git could benefit from more responsive official support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid options, delivering cost-effective solutions with extensive features, though managing licenses can be cumbersome. Git, being open source, incurs no licensing costs, appealing to budget-conscious users. Both platforms deliver strong ROI, with GitHub's functionalities enhancing collaboration savings and Git offering economical version control.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,533 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.3%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like Git's merging feature. For example, say there is an instance where I am working on the same code as another developer. Git automatically merges the work of two developers on the same file. If I'm working on line 50 and he's working on 60, and we both commit, it mergest automatically."

"Version control is beneficial as it allows me to keep track of all the modifications I have made to the applications."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"The most valuable feature of Git is the ease of tracking in time what the snapshot of the code was at a particular moment. The versioning is good."

"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."

"Git is a product everyone uses, so it's almost inescapable. I like the fact that there is a large ecosystem around it. You can bolt various graphical user interfaces onto it or sign up for various repositories like GitHub and AWS CodeCommit. Git has a large community, so there are lots of resources and knowledge bases you can use."

More Git pros

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"GitHub's merging feature is much better than that of other products because merging is done daily."

"The technical support of the solution is good, and our company has used it for GitHub upgrades."

"The product has a good UI. It's simple and easy to access, and technical help is easily available. The two-factor authentication security is another valuable feature."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is the version control field."

"The flexibility of this solution has been most valuable. It operates on a pay per use basis where you can ramp up or decrease usage."

"The Projects Tab, which shows you the todo list and the progress for projects, is very helpful."

"The most valuable feature is help offered by the community for open-source projects."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The price could be improved."

"Git is mostly command based and needs to have a helpful user interface."

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"There is nothing that could be improved at this time."

"About the configuration it is a little bit difficult, it can be improved."

More Git cons

"If it had all of the end-to-end integration, then we probably wouldn't have any doubts about what we have installed. However, at this point, we're still trying to figure out how to use it end-to-end."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity."

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"The only thing I see missing in GitHub is that it isn't very user friendly for key personnel who don't have in-depth, technical knowledge. In Jira, there are many functions to upload our test cases, and in GitHub we can only do it manually. There are functions which can be used to upload different files, but that still requires some technical knowledge. A layman cannot do it."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."

"There is nothing that I find that needs improvement in GitHub."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"The tool is free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"We use the open-source version."

"The platform is less expensive."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"The product is reasonably priced."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"We are currently paying nothing for GitHub."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"If I consider the market standards, the product's price is pocket-friendly."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 29% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 26% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

February 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

February 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

January 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,533 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.