Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.2% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,384 Views
1,264 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 92 GitHub reviews

2,282 Views
1,022 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Github and Git are competing tools in the open-source and version control systems category. GitHub appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced security features and seamless integration with various DevOps tools.

Features: GitHub's notable features include advanced security, GitHub Actions for automation, and cloud-based repositories facilitating team collaboration and integration with tools like Jenkins and Jira. Git, a robust version control system, supports effective branching, merging, and history tracking. Its compatibility with both CLI and GUI ensures flexibility for different user preferences.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could enhance its security features, improve integration with project management and DevOps tools, and develop a more user-friendly interface for non-technical users. Git could focus on improving its GUI, offering better support for non-text files and large repositories, and enhancing merge conflict resolution capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is well-suited for public and hybrid cloud environments, fostering remote collaboration. Git offers deployment flexibility in both cloud and on-premises settings. GitHub's community support is strong, though improvements in direct customer service for complex issues would be beneficial, while Git could benefit from more responsive official support.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid options, delivering cost-effective solutions with extensive features, though managing licenses can be cumbersome. Git, being open source, incurs no licensing costs, appealing to budget-conscious users. Both platforms deliver strong ROI, with GitHub's functionalities enhancing collaboration savings and Git offering economical version control.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 837,501 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.3%, down from 7.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"The features I am most impressed by is the automation."

"The most valuable feature of Git is its reliability and user popularity."

"So far, the product has been stable. Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to nine out of ten."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

More Git pros

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"This product allows us to easily collaborate on development tasks with our subcontractors, and control the workflow as the project progresses."

"GitHub is the best tool for source repositories."

"The learning curve is small."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"The most valuable feature of GitHub is version control and continuous integration."

"GitHub is a fundamental tool in the software industry."

"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"The solution works perfectly fine so far."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."

More Git cons

"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."

"Specifically, I want the solution to offer AI-based merging support, as it is the only area where the product has certain shortcomings."

"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"The stability can be improved."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

"GitHub should provide more integration in their next release, including integrating with Jenkins, CI/CD and Jira."

"One area for improvement in GitHub could be integration with other tools, such as test management or project management tools."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"The platform is less expensive."

"Git is an open-source software."

"We use the open-source version."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"Git is completely free."

"The tool is an open-source product."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"If there are only 10 people using a particular repository, then GitHub is free. But if we increase the number of users, we need to pay the normal charge for GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

13%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I'm not aware of the costs associated with GitHub. I simply appreciate its efficiency in managing code and collaborating with team members.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

I would like to see some AI functionality included in GitHub, similar to the features seen in GitLab, to enhance productivity. Additionally, offering limited free access to features like Copilot co...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 29% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 26% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 12% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

February 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

February 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

January 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

837,501 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.