Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0. Git holds a 7.0% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,712 Views
1,575 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 88 GitHub reviews

3,119 Views
1,265 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 29, 2024

GitHub and Git are leading version control systems. User reviews indicate GitHub has the upper hand due to its collaboration tools and integration with other development software, while Git is valued for its advanced features and flexibility.

Features: GitHub users value its collaboration tools, integration with other platforms, and enhanced security features. Git is praised for its branching and merging capabilities, extensive documentation, and powerful command-line interface.

Room for Improvement: GitHub users desire more robust offline support, better performance with large repositories, and improved features for managing large files. Git users often point to its steep learning curve, lack of a user-friendly web interface, and complicated setup process as areas needing enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub is noted for its straightforward cloud-based deployment model and responsive customer service, making it easy to set up and well-supported. Git, being a distributed system, offers flexible deployment options but requires more initial setup effort and learning. Git’s support primarily relies on community resources, which can be a limitation for some users.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub’s pricing model is seen as higher, with plans starting at $4 per user per month, but users feel it offers good value due to its comprehensive features and support. Git, being open-source, has no direct setup costs, providing an excellent ROI, especially for advanced users who can leverage its full capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 815,854 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.0%, down from 9.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.5%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Grazvydas Govaras

Senior Solution Architect at Danske

Jan 16, 2024

Helps to store and version the code

We use the solution for code management to store and version the code. It is the standard service we use for developing applications and infrastructure services You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches. I would like to see less updates with the product. I…

Read full review

AjayKrishna

Senior Software Engineer at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Sep 11, 2024

Reduces project delivery times and costs

I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature. It would allow us to move from one class file to another more easily, helping us search quicker and follow the code flow completely within GitHub. This would be more convenient than having to import the code into our local IDE to look at the code flow and navigate through it. Adding this kind of IDE-like navigation within the tool would make the user experience more seamless and efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The tool's most valuable feature is branch workflows."

"Git is a powerful and mature tool that all software engineers use, whether they use it from the command line with the original version or integrate it with various tools. It helps by promoting collaboration and eliminating problems with code in separate locations. This greatly boosts productivity since you're not lost in a massive local repository, and everything remains organized."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"Git is easy to manage...It is helpful for me and easy to manage the interface we are using from development to production."

"The initial setup is very easy."

"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."

"The best feature is that we can access it from anywhere if we have GitHub credentials."

"Git is easy to use."

More Git pros

"Even if I'm not in the office, I can access and work on my code from anywhere with my account credentials."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"The versioning of the code and the tracking of changes are definitely some of my top features."

"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."

"It has a lot of features from the code development perspective. You get a lot of features such as repo, commit, merge, and branch. You can play around and do things on the fly. It is easy and simple to deploy. It is also easier to use when working from home."

"GitHub have a built-in software application development environment and this has been most useful."

"The tool is valuable because it helps us work in a distributed environment with multiple people across different locations and time zones. We have a common repository that everyone works on, which would be tough to manage manually. GitHub helps us maintain this single source of truth. Everyone can check out their own branches, which is important for our branching strategies. We can fork, check out feature branches, work on our code, and merge back into parent branches for deployment. This is crucial when multiple people are working on the same codebase."

"The solution can scale."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

"The price could be improved."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"If another person raises a pull request under the same ID assigned to the previous person, and both parties modify the tool, their changes will be grouped together in the same request until it is closed, which is an issue."

"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."

"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."

"The solution could improve by having more customization."

More Git cons

"GitHub should work on enhancing its search capability. The tool should add some more features and functionalities."

"There is room for improvement in terms of interface."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"I think it would be valuable to have more security. Some of the data is very open to everyone."

"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."

"When I was new, I faced challenges with Git commands, such as reversing or deleting mistakes."

"The support team needs to have a well-defined SLA model since it is an area where the tool currently has some shortcomings."

"The GUI design is poor, so I exclusively use the CLI, which is much easier to use and understand. It would be great to see the GUI updated to be more user-friendly."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

"The platform is less expensive."

"Git is completely free."

"As a student, I didn't have to pay for the license."

"We use the open-source version."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"The tool is free."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"The tool offers a free program. As you go, you can upgrade from the community version to the professional one. I believe it costs about ten dollars per person, per month."

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"GitHub is a cost-effective solution."

"We pay a licensing fee for GitHub, which could be cheaper."

"I haven't had to pay anything for GitHub, I use the free version."

"The product is reasonably priced."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

I have not paid for GitHub as I use the free version for personal projects. Organizations may take separate servers from GitHub based on their needs, yet I am unaware of the pricing details.

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

GitHub could improve in resolving conflicts when multiple developers modify the same line of code. Introducing a feature to manage and resolve conflicts directly within the application rather than ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 33% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 15% of the time

Liquibase vs Git

Compared 8% of the time

More Git Competitors

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 18% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

November 2024

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

November 2024

Download GitHub product report

Learn More

Video not available

Git

GitHub

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

October 2024

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.