Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.6, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.7% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 5.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,290 Views
1,111 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

2,060 Views
908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and Git offer solutions in the version control systems category. GitHub holds an upper hand with its comprehensive collaboration tools and cloud-hosted capabilities, while Git provides robust version control with local development features.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with source code management, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, and integration with tools like Jenkins, offering advanced security and community-driven support for open-source projects. Git excels in simplicity for version control with Git Hooks and SSH keys, focusing on local development and effective incremental merging.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve by adding more DevOps tool integrations, enhancing security measures, and simplifying features for non-technical users. Git would benefit from a more advanced GUI, better merge conflict resolution, and a more intuitive user interface to broaden its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub operates primarily on the Public Cloud, offering scalable access, though support responsiveness is sometimes critiqued. Community support is strong. Git offers flexibility with deployment on various infrastructures, including on-premises, with reliable offline development and extensive documentation for independent problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid tiers with private repositories in the free plan, facing some licensing complexities. Git, being open-source, incurs no licensing fees, making it appealing to budget-conscious teams. Both systems offer strong ROI, with Git providing cost efficiency for managing codebases.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,716 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.7%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 5.9%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

"I use the solution for website management."

"The product is easy to use."

"The repository management and check-in/check-out commands are the most valuable features for ensuring secure code."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the branch management functionality."

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

"We use the tool to store codes."

"The implementation is easy."

More Git pros

"GitHub Actions, specifically in the DevOps field, have been extremely valuable."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"We use GitHub instead of our regular shared drive. It offers instant access to shared folders as well as good security."

"The features that I have found most valuable are that it can support you for most of the road map and it can automate some tasks which works really well with collaboration with the teams. They are really interested in how they organize the history of the code itself which is good."

"It provides Draft Pull Requests for review purposes without needing immediate merging and GitHub Actions for CI/CD implementation."

"We are finding GitHub is very stable."

"The most valuable features are GitHub are the standard features, they are very useful."

"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The tool is complicated for a beginner. You need to have some training to use it. It is also hard to find a parameter."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

"The product needs to improve its UI."

"The UI can be more user-friendly."

"Some challenges arise when Git is not used correctly, particularly in managing branches. It's easy to get lost, but these challenges can be overcome with proper management. A common advice is maintaining the repository and ensuring developers are in sync with the production branch. Branches should be promptly merged into development to avoid getting lost in many branches."

"In a future release, the user interface should be easier to use and more intuitive."

"If other people are included in their project, you're going to have to make merge requests to merge the code you made, and the code your colleagues have made. So it's a little bit complicated."

"I would like to see an improvement in the way the product owner can review changes."

More Git cons

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"While using the solution when merging two code branches the code becomes a bit messy. This should be improved in the future."

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

"From the recruiting standpoint, I would like to see email IDs and phone numbers and a brief introduction about their profile."

"The product must document the CI/CD process more."

"GitHub could improve by being more user-friendly."

"GitHub should work on enhancing its search capability. The tool should add some more features and functionalities."

"The query function in GitHub is a bit stiff."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is free."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"Git is an open-source software."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"There are some extra costs to Git, but it depends on your use case."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"The licensing model for GitHub is user-based. Whenever the new developer joins we have to get a new license and register their ID. The overall price of the solution is reasonable."

"GitHub is an open-source application. It's free to use."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"I use the free version of GitHub."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

14%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 35% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 17% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 16% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 15% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 9% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

April 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

April 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,716 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.