Git vs GitHub comparison

Git and GitHub are both solutions in the Version Control category. Git is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.7, while GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.9. Git holds a 7.9% mindshare in VC, compared to GitHub’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Git users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GitHub users who would recommend it.

Git

Read 38 Git reviews

1,185 Views
1,007 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

GitHub

Read 93 GitHub reviews

1,802 Views
834 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Git

GitHub

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and Git offer solutions in the version control systems category. GitHub holds an upper hand with its comprehensive collaboration tools and cloud-hosted capabilities, while Git provides robust version control with local development features.

Features: GitHub enhances collaboration with source code management, GitHub Actions for CI/CD, and integration with tools like Jenkins, offering advanced security and community-driven support for open-source projects. Git excels in simplicity for version control with Git Hooks and SSH keys, focusing on local development and effective incremental merging.

Room for Improvement: GitHub could improve by adding more DevOps tool integrations, enhancing security measures, and simplifying features for non-technical users. Git would benefit from a more advanced GUI, better merge conflict resolution, and a more intuitive user interface to broaden its reach.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub operates primarily on the Public Cloud, offering scalable access, though support responsiveness is sometimes critiqued. Community support is strong. Git offers flexibility with deployment on various infrastructures, including on-premises, with reliable offline development and extensive documentation for independent problem-solving.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub provides both free and paid tiers with private repositories in the free plan, facing some licensing complexities. Git, being open-source, incurs no licensing fees, making it appealing to budget-conscious teams. Both systems offer strong ROI, with Git providing cost efficiency for managing codebases.

To learn more, read our detailed Git vs. GitHub Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,671 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Git

Ranking in Version Control

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of Git is 7.9%, down from 8.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GitHub is 6.0%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Srujan Panuganti

Scientist - Instrument II at AbbVie

An excellent open source, software hosting solution that provides strong version control functionality and a user-friendly interface

We use this solution to host our software, and where we need to develop new features and new functionality, we create new branch from our existing software, work on our branch, develop it, test it, validate it, and then merge it with the master or main software The best thing about this solution…

Read full review

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product protects our data."

"All of the features in Git are useful."

"The scalability of the solution is good."

"Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."

"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."

"Git is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

"Git's learning curve is shallow, making the solution easy to use after a few tutorials."

"I like that it's easy to use and because it's accessible from a terminal or a graphical user interface if needed. I also like that we can pass comments from Linux if required."

More Git pros

"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."

"The most valuable features are GitHub Actions for triggering workflows, GitHub Secrets for saving credentials without needing a third-party service, and the UI for identifying errors in the code when we commit."

"I recommend using GitHub because it is reliable and helpful for developers."

"GitHub is a very good tool, and people should use it more than any other, even Bitbucket."

"For branching, it works well, especially in an agile environment."

"I have found GitHub stable."

"I use this solution to store my code in a repository so we can manage version control which is useful."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

More GitHub pros

Cons

"The solution could be more user-friendly."

"It would be preferable if the updates could be completed at a faster pace."

"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."

"In our company, we sometimes feel the need to have certain kinds of reports, but we never get those customized reports in Git's dashboard."

"The GUI needs to be improved."

"The scalability could be better. I think it requires some discipline to have large teams working on the same project without facing problems merging code. I'm using Git for personal projects, but I know companies face merge conflicts when more than one person is working on code simultaneously."

"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."

"Git's user interface could be improved."

More Git cons

"The documentation needs to be more concise and easier for developers to understand."

"I think one area where GitHub could improve is its search and navigation functionality within repositories. For example, we use IDEs like IntelliJ or Visual Studio Code when developing code. These IDEs allow us to easily navigate from one piece of code to another file where a method is being called. It would be really helpful if the solution could add this navigation feature."

"Our firewall was blocking cloning and downloading with SSH."

"GitHub needs to improve its UI."

"The solution's cost is high and should be reduced."

"We face issues with synchronization while working with teams."

"GitHub uses basic configuration, but messaging is not clear."

"They're improving the work items to track the progress of the team, but in my experience, Azure DevOps is better in this functionality. GitHub needs to improve the form to track the progress of the work done by a team."

More GitHub cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Git is an open-source software."

"We use the open-source version."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no licensing fees associated with it, and no extra, 'hidden' charges."

"The platform is less expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"The tool is an open-source product."

"We are using the open-source version, which is available free of charge."

"Git is free and you don't have to pay for it."

More Git pricing and cost advice

"It's cheaper than Bitbucket."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"We have an enterprise licensing agreement, and I am not part of the finance department so I can't say how much it costs."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"I think, in terms of price, GitHub is okay compared to other tools."

"You don't have to pay for a license if you are using the free version."

"We pay a subscription-based yearly licensing fee for the solution."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Git?

You can have a central code repository using Git and have local code branches.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Git?

Git is an open-source software.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Git?

There is nothing that could be improved at this time.

See all answers

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Rational ClearCase vs Git

Compared 37% of the time

Surround SCM vs Git

Compared 17% of the time

Atlassian SourceTree vs Git

Compared 14% of the time

Canonical Bazaar vs Git

Compared 11% of the time

Helix Core vs Git

Compared 10% of the time

More Git Competitors

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 17% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 13% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmarx One vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Git

April 2025

Download Git product report

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

April 2025

Download GitHub product report

Overview

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency. Git is easy to learn and has a tiny footprint with lightning fast performance. It outclasses SCM tools like Subversion, CVS, Perforce, and ClearCase with features like cheap local branching, convenient staging areas, and multiple workflows.

Git

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Sample Customers

Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, LinkedIn, Netflix, PostgreSQL, Android, Rails, QT, Gnome, Eclipse

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Buyer's Guide

Git vs. GitHub

April 2025

Free Report: Git vs. GitHub

Find out what your peers are saying about Git vs. GitHub and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,671 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Git vs. GitHub report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.