We use it for managing workflows, workflow data, and state management. We'll use it for tenant metadata information and keeping it.
We have some BI use cases as well. We are in the automation industry, so, in general, whatever is required for automation, we keep all that information.
We are using standard SQLs features only, so we don't use any very specific feature assets.
One feature we've found pretty interesting was their support, which is multi-region support. They have good multi-region failure support, and we can just set up there and read replicas directly and we can fall back. We are quite pleased with the results.
The initial setup is straightforward.
It's stable.
The solution can scale.
The purging of the data could be better. We don't have a good mechanism to deal with the old data, especially when the data grows. We see latency issues, so we were forced to introduce an in-memory store. Otherwise, the solution is fine.
The enterprise edition is quite expensive.
I've used the solution for a few months.
The stability is good. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
Currently, our DevOps team is using the product, and we have 20 to 30 people using it. We have plans to increase usage.
While it is scalable, I don't yet have practical experience with the process.
The solution is very easy to set up. It's not overly complex.
The deployment is very fast. It was only a few minutes.
I'd rate the solution three and a half out of five in terms of ease of setup.
I'd rate it higher if there was general serverless support or good best practices by way of documentation for setting everything up. We are using the enterprise model. Having best practices and serverless support would make it a bit better.
Right now, we don't need much maintenance as we're still in the beginning stages and don't have much production workload.
We were able to handle the setup ourselves. The documentation was good enough to follow so that the setup was easy.
The pricing is interesting. For the enterprise edition, it was almost three times the cost of the standard edition. There should be some more clarity on that. It was not very clear why it's so much more or what the differences are. It requires better documentation.
We're a customer and end-user.
We moved quite recently in production. In terms of the development run, we were on AWS. Now, some of the workloads we are moving to GCP even though we have been an Amazon shop for a long time.
We are working on the latest version of the solution.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
